Module 03 Course Project: Business And User Requirements Doc

Module 03 Course Project Business And User Requirements Document Dra

Review the course project description on the Module 01 Course Project - Introduction (which is listed above) in order to understand the overall needs of the organization and the specific business processes which the project should address. In response to these needs, prepare a draft requirements document which describes the following: The sources of information that would be used to gather business and user requirements. List the specific hospital departments and roles you would include; Explain why each of these staff members was chosen and relevant for providing information for this project.

Methods of information gathering that you would use to provide a comprehensive list of business and user requirements for the project. Provide specific definitions and analysis of your methods including at least: Focus groups; Questionnaires; and Direct Observations of staff. Do not just say to "hold meetings" with the staff listed above.

8-12 requirements that should be met in order for this project to satisfactorily address the needs expressed in the project. Requirements are written in proper format as taught in this course. Each requirement should represent specific system functionality. Do not include global goal statements such as "improving quality" or "saving on expenses." A separate assignment will be addressing our overall project goals, in the near future. Note that these requirements should not include specific technical requirements, but instead must focus on the needs of the facility and of the people who will be using the project as an alternative means of performing business processes they already perform. Your paper should be approximately 3-5 pages in length.

Paper For Above instruction

The development of a comprehensive and accurate Business and User Requirements Document is a critical step in the successful implementation of an Electronic Health Record System (EHRS) for the Good Apples Group. This process involves systematic collection and analysis of information from key stakeholders, which ensures that the system aligns with the operational needs and workflows of the healthcare facility. In this paper, I will delineate the sources of information, the methods employed for data collection, and articulate specific system requirements that address the needs of the facility, all within the context of the case provided.

Sources of Information

The initial step involves identifying pertinent sources of information within the healthcare facility. These sources include detailed inputs from various hospital departments that are directly involved in clinical, administrative, and support functions. Critical departments encompass the Medical Records Department, Nursing, Physician services, Laboratory, Pharmacy, Radiology, and Billing and Coding Units. Each department possesses unique insights into their workflows, and their role-specific perspectives are vital for capturing comprehensive requirements.

The Medical Records Department serves as the custodian of patient information and insights into documentation workflows. Nursing staff provides real-time clinical data entry needs and patient care processes. Physicians offer perspective on documentation, order entry, and clinical decision support. The Laboratory, Pharmacy, and Radiology departments inform about their specific data input and reporting needs. Billing and coding professionals shed light on revenue cycle management processes. Including these departments ensures that the system caters effectively to both clinical and administrative operations, fostering seamless integration and data sharing.

Methods of Information Gathering

Effective collection of requirements necessitates employing varied methodologies to gather detailed and reliable data. I propose the use of focus groups, questionnaires, and direct observations. Focus groups facilitate discussion among stakeholders, allowing for the exploration of workflow nuances and consensus-building on system needs. These sessions enable participants to voice concerns, suggest features, and clarify priorities.

Questionnaires are structured data collection tools that can reach a broader audience within the departments. They help quantify needs, identify common issues, and highlight differences across roles. Well-designed questionnaires with open- and closed-ended questions can ascertain user preferences, frequency of system use, and feature importance.

Direct observation involves shadowing staff during their routines, providing insight into real-world workflows, operational bottlenecks, and informal processes not easily articulated in interviews or questionnaires. Observations yield rich contextual understanding and help verify the accuracy of information gathered via other methods.

Combining these methods ensures triangulation, increasing reliability and completeness of the gathered requirements. Each method complements the others, capturing both the stated and unstated needs of users, and provides a comprehensive picture necessary for system development.

System Requirements

The following are 10-12 specific system functionality requirements that are essential for addressing the needs of the Good Apples Group facility. These requirements are framed to focus on operational needs rather than technical specifications and are formulated according to proper requirement statement conventions.

  • Patient Registration Input: The system shall allow authorized staff to create, update, and verify patient demographic information swiftly during registration.
  • Order Entry Capability: The system shall enable physicians and authorized clinicians to electronically enter diagnoses, prescriptions, and lab/test orders directly into the patient's electronic record.
  • Clinical Document Management: The system shall facilitate real-time access to patient's clinical documents, including progress notes, discharge summaries, and diagnostic reports.
  • Medication Reconciliation: The system shall support medication reconciliation processes by allowing staff to review and update current medication lists during patient visits or transfers.
  • Alerts and Reminders: The system shall generate clinical alerts and reminders related to allergies, medication interactions, and preventive care based on patient data.
  • Result Reporting and Viewing: The system shall allow laboratory, radiology, and pharmacy results to be entered and reviewed by authorized clinical staff in a timely manner.
  • Billing and Coding Integration: The system shall support the capture of billing information and coding data directly from clinical documentation to streamline revenue cycle management.
  • Access Control: The system shall provide role-based access to ensure that users can only view and modify information pertinent to their role, maintaining patient confidentiality and data security.
  • Audit Trails: The system shall maintain detailed audit logs of user actions to monitor system use and ensure compliance with regulatory standards.
  • Workflow Support: The system shall support healthcare workflows such as inpatient admissions, discharges, and transfers, including the ability to generate required documentation automatically.
  • Patient Discharge and Follow-up Planning: The system shall facilitate discharge planning and follow-up scheduling, ensuring continuity of care post-discharge.
  • Staff Notifications: The system shall provide notifications and alerts to relevant staff for critical events such as abnormal lab results or urgent patient care needs.

Conclusion

In summary, a meticulous approach to gathering requirements—drawing from key departments through diverse methods—enables the development of a targeted and functional EHRS. The articulated requirements focus on enhancing clinical and administrative workflows, ensuring data integrity, security, and support for decision-making. This structured effort lays a solid foundation for subsequent phases of system design and implementation, aligning technological solutions with practical, real-world healthcare delivery needs at the Good Apples Group.

References

  • Adler-Mexwell, S., & Khan, M. (2019). Healthcare Information Systems: Challenges and Solutions. Journal of Medical Systems, 43(10), 235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1440-7
  • Blum, J. D. (2018). Implementing Electronic Health Records in Healthcare Organizations. Health Informatics Journal, 24(2), 123-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458216684916
  • Hersh, W. R. (2020). Information Technology and the Future of Health Care. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(3), e12927. https://doi.org/10.2196/12927
  • Kruse, C. S., et al. (2018). Barriers to Electronic Health Record Adoption: A Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Systems, 42(11), 202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-018-1064-3
  • Mettler, T. (2016). Transformation of Healthcare through Business Process Management and Electronic Health Records. Business Process Management Journal, 22(4), 679–691. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-03-2015-0026
  • Shortliffe, E. H., & Cimino, J. J. (2014). Biomedical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care and Biomedicine. Springer.
  • Stein, D. M. (2018). Practical Guide to Implementing a Clinical Decision Support System. Journal of Healthcare Information Management, 32(2), 13–20.
  • Voshall, B. (2019). Workflow Analysis in Healthcare: Methodologies and Applications. Healthcare Management Review, 44(1), 35–43.
  • Wager, K. A., et al. (2017). Health Care Information Systems: A Practical Approach for Health Care Management. Jossey-Bass.
  • Zhang, Y., et al. (2021). Security and Privacy Issues in Electronic Health Records: A Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(1), e22090. https://doi.org/10.2196/22090

Related Assignments