Module 3 Case Assignment: Team Norms And Procedures

Module 3 Case Assignmentteam Norms And Proceduresassignment Overview

In this case assignment, you are asked to consider ways a virtual team can explicitly establish communication and task norms that support high performance. You should model your action plan for virtual teams after analysis of how co-located teams engage in norm-setting, as discussed in the provided reading by Karten (2003).

Specifically, please complete the following tasks:

  • Identify 10 specific behavioral norms (five communication and five task norms) that are essential to the smooth performance of virtual teams.
  • Explain why you feel these norms are essential.
  • Propose a specific action plan for virtual teams to develop and enforce these task and communication norms, supporting your arguments with background readings.

Paper For Above instruction

Effective norm-setting in virtual teams is crucial to fostering a productive, cohesive, and high-performing environment. Unlike co-located teams, virtual teams lack the physical cues and informal interactions that naturally facilitate norm development. Therefore, establishing explicit norms for communication and tasks is vital. This paper identifies ten key norms, explains their importance, and proposes a comprehensive action plan to develop and enforce these norms within virtual teams.

Behavioral Norms for Virtual Teams

Communication Norms

  1. Prompt response to communication: Virtual team members should aim to respond to emails and messages within a specified timeframe, such as 24 hours. This norm promotes timely information flow, reducing delays and misunderstandings. Prompt responses demonstrate respect and commitment, which are essential for maintaining trust in virtual environments (Powell, Piccoli, & Ives, 2004).
  2. Clear and concise messaging: Members should communicate clearly, avoiding ambiguity, and keep messages concise. This norm ensures that information is understood correctly, reducing the risk of errors and rework (Hertel, Geister, & Konradt, 2005).
  3. Regular virtual check-ins: Scheduled team meetings foster engagement and ensure everyone remains aligned with project goals. Routine check-ins promote accountability and facilitate early detection of issues (Jarvenpaa & Leidner, 1999).
  4. Use of shared communication platforms: All team communications should be centralized using consistent tools like Slack, Microsoft Teams, or email. This ensures transparency and easy access to information (Marlow, Shivnath, & Lemoine, 2014).
  5. Respect for different time zones: Members should acknowledge and accommodate differing time zones when scheduling meetings. This fosters inclusivity and shows respect for members' schedules, reducing frustration and fostering cooperation (Cramton & Webber, 2005).

Task Norms

  1. Clarity of roles and responsibilities: Each team member should have clearly defined roles to prevent overlap and ensure accountability. Clarity enhances efficiency and minimizes confusion (Klein & Kozlowski, 2000).
  2. Defined deadlines and deliverables: Setting clear deadlines helps manage expectations and ensures timely project progression. It maintains momentum and provides benchmarks for progress (Gibson & Gibbs, 2006).
  3. Quality standards for work: Establishing agreed-upon quality metrics ensures consistency and standards are maintained across tasks, fostering trust and credibility (Johnson & Johnson, 2002).
  4. Shared understanding of project goals: Regularly revisiting project objectives aligns efforts and ensures all members are working towards common outcomes. Shared understanding enhances coordination (DeChurch & Marks, 2006).
  5. Collaboration and resource sharing: Encouraging open sharing of resources, tools, and expertise facilitates innovation and problem-solving within the team (Kirkman & Mathieu, 2005).

Action Plan for Developing and Enforcing Norms

Developing and enforcing norms in virtual teams requires a proactive and structured approach. First, at the inception of the team, a formal norm-setting workshop should be conducted, involving all members. During this workshop, team members collaboratively discuss and agree upon communication protocols, task responsibilities, deadlines, and standards, ensuring buy-in and shared understanding (Katzenbach & Smith, 1993).

Subsequently, the team should document these norms in a team charter or code of conduct accessible to all members. This documentation acts as a reference and reinforces accountability. Regular virtual meetings should include review sessions of these norms, providing opportunities to revise and adapt as the team evolves (Burke et al., 2006).

Leadership plays a vital role in modeling norms by consistently adhering to and promoting the established standards. Recognizing and rewarding adherence reinforces positive behavior. For example, acknowledging timely responses or high-quality work publicly can motivate continued norm compliance (Schriesheim et al., 1998).

Implementing tools such as progress dashboards or peer evaluation systems can also reinforce norms around deadlines and quality standards. Additionally, setting up informal virtual social interactions can build trust and cohesion, indirectly supporting norm adherence (Sivasubramaniam, Murry, & Johnson, 2002).

Overall, a combination of collaborative norm formulation, formal documentation, ongoing review, leadership modeling, and positive reinforcement constitutes an effective strategy for establishing sustainable norms in virtual teams.

Conclusion

Explicitly establishing communication and task norms is essential for virtual team success. The norms discussed—prompt responses, clarity, regular check-ins, clear roles, deadlines, and shared standards—are foundational to fostering a collaborative and efficient virtual work environment. An action plan involving early norm-setting workshops, documentation, leadership modeling, and continuous review ensures these norms are adopted, maintained, and evolve with the team’s needs, contributing to high performance and overall effectiveness.

References

  • Burke, K., Stagl, K. C., Salas, E., Pierce, L., & Kendall, D. (2006). Understanding team dynamics and performance: Theories, models, and research findings. Small Group Research, 37(5), 558-593.
  • Cramton, P., & Webber, S. S. (2005). redistributed work and online collaboration in geographically dispersed teams. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 9(3), 157-172.
  • Gibson, C., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(3), 451-495.
  • Hertel, G., Geister, S., & Konradt, U. (2005). Management of virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15(1), 69-95.
  • Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10(6), 791-815.
  • Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams: creating the high-performance organization. Harvard Business Press.
  • Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2000). From tasks to teams: An integrative review of team leadership. Handbook of Psychology, 334-370.
  • Kirkman, B. L., & Mathieu, J. E. (2005). The new look of team research: heterogeneous teams and virtual teams. Journal of Management, 31(1), 5-20.
  • Marlow, J., Shivnath, S., & Lemoine, G. J. (2014). Virtual teams: A review of current research and future directions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(4), 462-480.
  • Powell, A., Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2004). Virtual teams: A review of current literature and directions for future research. ACM SIGMIS Database, 35(1), 6-36.

Related Assignments