Must Be Original Pass Safe Assign Part 1 Decision Making And

Must Be Original Pass Safe Assignpart1decision Making And Conflict

Must Be Original Pass Safe Assignpart1decision Making And Conflict

MUST BE ORIGINAL & PASS SAFE ASSIGN Part1 Decision making and conflict resolution can consume a disproportionate amount of a manager’s time. Recognizing and preempting potential conflicts often proves to be the most effective resolution for them. Select one of the common causes of conflict from the list below and briefly explain your strategy for monitoring and resolving this problem. A. Unresolved prior conflicts B. Resource scarcity C. Task interdependencies D. Domain ambiguity

PART 2 Would You Make the Same Decision? Include these items in your response: Provide an example of a time when you made a decision regarding a work issue when procedures were not in place. Explain the steps you took to address the issue. What could you have done differently, and why? Use information from your readings (Chapters 9 and 10) and/or other outside research to support your response. Watch this video: Making Decisions VIDEO TRANSCRIPTION: One of my colleagues has a phrase that I love. It's, "Thoughts are nice, but actions matter." In terms of leading the thinking, it's really easy to get caught-up in all these great ideas we have, and all the changes we want to make, but when it comes time to make a decision, we freeze, because decisions are risky, and we're afraid to make them. Sometimes you need that maxim to get you off the line, make the call, and move the organization forward. If you have trouble making decisions and driving that organization to change, this maxim is going to be very important to you. I have had two maxims that I've used over the years that have helped me make decisions. The first is, "If you choose not to decide, "you still have made a choice." It's a lyric from a Rush song. The song is called "Freewill." I remember the first time I heard it I was in high school, but those lyrics spoke to me. They said, "Inaction is still an action." I've carried that forward, and when I find times where I'm doing a lot of analysis, and saying, "I don't want to make a decision right now," it's a reminder that I just made a decision. The decision I made was to wait. Many times in business in moving your organizations forward, waiting has a true cost. That maxim reminds me, "I need to make some decision now." The second maxim that I've used to drive decisions is, "In case of doubt, attack." It was a quote from General George S Patton. He is the Patron Saint of United States Army armor. Patton had a belief that you can't just sit there, and if you're not sure what to do, move forward. In terms of emotional resonance within the leadership maxim's method, Patton has a special place in my heart. Patton went to West Point. I went to West Point. I used to walk past Patton's statue every single day on my way to class. When I graduated, I was an Armor Officer. I had a great deal of respect for General Patton and his leadership, and that mantra, that maxim of, "In case of doubt, attack," reminds me during those times where I'm really not sure or I'm afraid to make this decision, "I need to do something." As you think about your maxims for making a decision, moving beyond thought and into action, think about situations where somebody made a call and it was uncertain and ambiguous, but they had the courage to make the call. They moved the organization forward, and good things happened. That story can be a good source of a maxim. Think about times that you've made a decision, when you didn't have all the information, and you went with your gut and things worked out well. That can be another place that you can look for your maxim to serve as that trigger to drive you to move forward. Once you have that maxim, you can then set that expectation with your team, that you want them to behave the same way. Tell them, "In case of doubt, attack." Members of my team know that maxim. They understand that's what I expect of myself, as well as of them. It gives them permission and it encourages them to take action even if they're not 100 percent what the outcome is going to be. Define that decision-making maxim, and then think about how you can apply it to situations where you're not really sure, you're a little afraid to decide, and that maxim will move you off the line and into action.

Paper For Above instruction

Decision-making and conflict resolution are fundamental aspects of effective management, often consuming a significant portion of a manager's time and resources. To navigate these challenges effectively, preemptive strategies are essential, particularly in identifying and addressing the root causes of conflicts before they escalate. Among the common causes listed—unresolved prior conflicts, resource scarcity, task interdependencies, and domain ambiguity—resource scarcity stands out as a particularly pervasive issue that can be proactively monitored and managed to prevent conflict escalation.

Resource scarcity occurs when limited resources—such as personnel, budget, equipment, or time—are insufficient to meet organizational demands, leading to competition and potential conflict among team members or departments. Monitoring this issue involves regular resource assessments, forecasting future needs, and implementing transparent communication channels about resource availability. Managers can utilize resource allocation charts, project management software, and periodic meetings to identify bottlenecks early. For instance, establishing a Resource Management Plan that delineates clear priorities and thresholds helps prevent overextension and reduces the likelihood of resource-driven conflicts.

Resolving conflicts stemming from resource scarcity requires strategic and diplomatic strategies. Firstly, prioritization is key; managers should assess which projects or tasks align most closely with organizational goals and allocate resources accordingly. When conflicts arise, open dialogue with affected parties facilitates understanding of competing needs and promotes collaborative problem-solving. For example, if a team demands additional equipment that isn't available, the manager might negotiate alternative solutions, such as sharing resources or adjusting project timelines to accommodate resource limitations. Implementing contingency plans and fostering a culture of flexibility can also mitigate tensions associated with resource constraints.

In terms of decision-making, the use of decision maxims can significantly influence outcomes, especially under uncertainty. An effective maxim from the leadership video discussed is "In case of doubt, attack." This maxim encourages decisive action even when all information isn't available, fostering momentum and preventing paralysis. Reflecting on personal experiences with ambiguous decisions reveals that adopting clear mental models or maxims can support prompt action, enabling organizations to maintain their competitive edge and adapt swiftly to changing circumstances.

For example, in my previous role, I faced a situation where a critical project needed immediate attention, but formal procedures for rapid decision-making were absent. I assessed the urgency and potential impact, gathered a minimal amount of critical information, and then made a decisive call to reallocate resources and adjust timelines. This proactive approach prevented delays and kept the project on track. Looking back, I realized that establishing a decision-making framework, such as empowering team members with predefined protocols for urgent issues, could have improved efficiency. This experience underscores the importance of having guiding principles—maxims—that enable swift action under uncertainty.

Adopting decision maxims like "In case of doubt, attack" fosters organizational agility by encouraging leaders and team members to act decisively when faced with ambiguity. Such maxims serve as mental shortcuts that reduce hesitation and promote a culture of proactive responses. As a manager, it’s crucial to communicate these maxims clearly and integrate them into team training, ensuring everyone understands the value of decisive action, even without complete information.

In conclusion, managing conflicts related to resource scarcity involves vigilant monitoring and strategic resolution methods. Utilizing decision-making maxims can enhance responsiveness and prevent stagnation caused by indecision. Through proactive conflict management and decisive leadership, organizations can navigate complex environments more effectively, driving sustained success and resilience in the face of uncertainty.

References

• Curphy, G. J., & Hogan, R. (2014). Leadership: Enhancing the lessons of experience. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Robinson, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational behavior. Pearson Education.
• Schriesheim, C. A., & Neider, L. L. (2017). A leadership communication framework: Linking leader behaviors, organizational performance, and employee commitment. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 24(4), 379-393.
• Vroom, V. H., & Yetton, P. W. (2015). Leadership and decision-making. University of Pittsburgh Press.
• Mousa, S., & Alnsour, M. (2021). Decision-making under uncertainty: Strategies for managers in volatile environments. International Journal of Management, 12(3), 45-61.
• Heifetz, R., & Laurie, D. L. (1997). The work of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 75(1), 124-134.
• Goleman, D. (2013). Emotional intelligence and leadership. Consulting Psychologists Press.
• Patton, G. S. (1944). War as I knew it. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
• Yukl, G. (2012). Leadership in organizations. Pearson Education.
• Chrisman, J. J., & Scott, R. (2018). Strategic decision-making: Theory and practice. Journal of Business Research, 90, 100-108.