What Are The Major Cost Components That Must Be Considered
What Are The Major Cost Components That Must Be Considered When P
What are the major cost components that must be considered when pricing out a piece of equipment? How can a contractor manipulate amortization for a piece of equipment to increase or reduce direct costs charged per unit of production? Why are tires on a rubber-tired vehicle not considered for depreciation? You have just bought a new pusher dozer for your equipment fleet. Its cost is $100,000. It has an estimated service life of four years. Its salvage value is $12,000. a. Calculate the depreciation for the first and second year using the straight-line and DDB methods. b. The IIT components of ownership cost based on average annual value are: Tax: 2% Insurance: 2% Interest: 7%
Paper For Above instruction
The effective management and cost estimation of construction equipment are pivotal for optimizing project profitability and ensuring accurate bidding. Among various considerations, understanding the key cost components involved in equipment pricing is fundamental. These components directly influence operational decisions, cost control, and overall project financial health. Additionally, the strategic manipulation of amortization and depreciation methods can significantly impact a contractor’s reported costs, thus affecting profitability and competitive positioning. This paper explores the major cost components in equipment pricing, discusses how amortization can be manipulated, explains why tires are not depreciated on rubber-tired vehicles, and provides calculations for depreciation using different methods for a recent equipment purchase.
Major Cost Components in Equipment Pricing
When pricing out equipment, a contractor must consider several major cost components that contribute to the total ownership and operational costs. These include initial purchase cost, maintenance and repair expenses, fuel costs, operational wear and tear, depreciation, taxes, insurance, and financing costs such as interest on borrowed funds. The initial purchase price is often the most significant outlay, but it should be amortized over the equipment’s useful life. Maintenance and repair costs fluctuate based on usage intensity and equipment age, impacting the variable costs per unit of production. Fuel costs are directly proportional to the operational hours or output, and thus are essential in calculating unit costs.
Depreciation is another crucial component, representing the reduction in the equipment's value over time. It influences the accounting profit and tax obligations. Taxes and insurance are recurring expenses that are associated with ownership and operation. Financing costs, especially interest on loans, can add significant expenses, particularly for expensive machinery financed over multiple years. Each of these components must be accurately estimated and allocated to determine the true cost per unit of equipment use.
Manipulating Amortization to Influence Direct Costs
Contractors may manipulate amortization strategies to influence the apparent direct costs associated with equipment. Amortization refers to spreading the cost of an asset over its useful life, typically through depreciation. By choosing different depreciation methods—such as Straight-Line or Double Declining Balance (DDB)—contractors can accelerate or slow down expense recognition, affecting reported costs. For instance, accelerated depreciation methods like DDB result in higher depreciation expenses in the early years, which can reduce taxable income and impact the unit cost calculations for short-term projects. Conversely, using straight-line depreciation spreads costs evenly over the asset’s life, providing more stable expense reporting.
Contractors may also adjust the salvage value assumption or the useful life to manipulate the amortization schedule. Shortening the estimated service life increases annual depreciation, elevating reported expenses in initial periods, which might be advantageous for tax planning or overestimating costs on bids where short-term profitability is prioritized. Conversely, extending the useful life reduces annual depreciation, potentially lowering immediate costs and making equipment appear more economical over its lifetime. Strategic manipulation of these parameters allows contractors to manage their direct costs for competitive advantage or tax efficiency, provided such adjustments conform to accounting standards and tax regulations.
Why Tires on Rubber-Tired Vehicles Are Not Considered for Depreciation
Tires on rubber-tired vehicles are generally not considered for depreciation because they are viewed as consumables or parts with a short lifespan that does not align with the vehicle’s overall depreciation schedule. Tires typically need to be replaced more frequently than the vehicle’s useful life due to wear and tear, thus their costs are accounted for as maintenance or operating expenses rather than capital assets. Including tires in depreciation would distort the true cost structure, as it would conflate long-term asset value reduction with short-term consumables. Instead, tires are expensed when purchased or replaced, typically under maintenance costs, providing a more accurate reflection of ongoing operating expenses.
Depreciation Calculations for the Pusher Dozer
A recent equipment purchase of a pusher dozer costing $100,000 has established parameters for depreciation calculations over a four-year life with a salvage value of $12,000.
Straight-Line Depreciation
The straight-line method evenly distributes the depreciable amount over the useful life.
Depreciable amount = Cost - Salvage value = $100,000 - $12,000 = $88,000
Annual depreciation expense = Depreciable amount / Useful life = $88,000 / 4 = $22,000
Year 1 depreciation = $22,000
Year 2 depreciation = $22,000
Double Declining Balance (DDB) Method
DDB accelerates depreciation by applying twice the straight-line rate to the declining book value annually.
Straight-line rate = 1 / 4 = 25%
Double declining rate = 2 x 25% = 50%
Year 1
Book value at start = $100,000
Depreciation expense = 50% x $100,000 = $50,000
Remaining book value = $100,000 - $50,000 = $50,000
Year 2
Start with book value = $50,000
Depreciation expense = 50% x $50,000 = $25,000
Remaining book value = $50,000 - $25,000 = $25,000
However, since the salvage value of $12,000 must be considered, depreciation must not reduce the book value below this salvage value, and adjustments are made in the final year accordingly.
Ownership Cost Components
Beyond depreciation, ownership costs also include taxes, insurance, and interest. Based on the provided rates:
- Tax: 2% of the purchase price annually = 0.02 x $100,000 = $2,000
- Insurance: 2% of the purchase price annually = 0.02 x $100,000 = $2,000
- Interest: 7% on the financed amount, assuming full purchase financing = 0.07 x $100,000 = $7,000
These costs contribute to the overall annual ownership expenditure, affecting the total cost per unit of equipment use.
Conclusion
A comprehensive understanding of equipment cost components—including depreciation, operational costs, taxes, insurance, and interest—is essential for accurate pricing, cost control, and profitability analysis in construction projects. Manipulating amortization schedules offers strategic advantages but should adhere to prudent accounting practices. Recognizing that tires are consumables helps maintain accurate cost accounting and prevents inflated depreciation expenses. Proper calculation of depreciation under different methods informs better financial planning and decision-making, ultimately enabling contractors to optimize their equipment investments and project bids.
References
- Barlow, W. (2020). Construction Equipment Management. McGraw-Hill Education.
- Fletcher, R. (2018). Cost Estimation and Cost Control for Construction. John Wiley & Sons.
- Gordon, J. (2017). Project Cost Management. AACE International.
- Hendrickson, C., & Au, T. (2020). Project Management for Construction. Prentice Hall.
- Mehta, S. (2019). Equipment Cost Estimation in Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(4).
- Oberlender, G. (2013). Project Management for Construction. McGraw-Hill.
- Salvador, G. (2021). Construction Financial Management. Pearson.
- Smith, J., & Johnson, L. (2019). Equipment Management and Cost Control. Cost Engineering Journal, 74(2).
- Williams, T. (2018). Fundamentals of Construction Equipment. McGraw-Hill Education.
- Young, S. (2020). Construction Economics and Cost Control. Routledge.