My Job Has 5 People In The Building: 2 Teachers, 2 Aides, An ✓ Solved

My Job Has 5 People In The Building 2 Teachers 2 Aides And A Cook

Discuss how decisions are made in your workgroup. Which model is used for what situation? Be sure to provide specific examples of at least three situations and what model was used in each situation. Critique the effectiveness of the model, as applied to each situation. Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts.

Evaluate your workplace and identify a group that has “power” in the organization. Analyze why the group is considered powerful. a. What are the elements that contribute to the group’s power base? b. Is there a perception among employees in your organization that a disparity of power exists between the “powerful group” and other work groups? c. How can managers minimize the possibility of negative reactions or conflict between groups if the perception of power disparity exists?

Sample Paper For Above instruction

In a small organization such as my early childhood education setting, decision-making processes are integral to the smooth functioning and morale of the team. The team comprises two teachers, two aides, and a cook, all working collaboratively under a shared leadership approach. As a three-year head start teacher, I observe and participate in various decision-making models that adapt to different situations, illustrating the flexibility and dynamism of organizational behavior in such settings.

Decision-Making Models in Practice

The participative decision-making model is predominant in our workplace. This model involves team members actively participating in decisions affecting their work, fostering shared responsibility and ownership. For example, when planning the daily curriculum, all staff members collaborate to decide activities that meet developmental goals and children's interests. This participative approach ensures buy-in and leverages diverse perspectives for more innovative and educationally sound outcomes.

Another model used is the authoritative decision-making model, which is typically employed in emergency situations where swift action is necessary. For instance, during a minor health crisis—such as a child needing immediate attention—the lead teacher (myself in this case) makes quick decisions to provide first aid or summon medical assistance, without extensive consultation. This model's effectiveness lies in its ability to expedite responses, although it might sometimes overlook team input, potentially affecting team cohesion if used excessively.

The consensus decision-making model is also observed during periodic staff meetings concerning policies or environmental changes. Here, the group discusses issues until a collective agreement is reached, ensuring everyone's voice is heard. While this fosters inclusiveness, it can be time-consuming and sometimes impractical when rapid decisions are needed.

Critique of Decision-Making Effectiveness

The participative model generally enhances team morale and ensures decisions are well-informed, yet it may slow down processes when quick action is required. In our setting, this model works well for routine planning but might hinder responsiveness during urgent matters. The authoritative model is highly effective when immediate decisions are critical, but over-reliance can undermine team involvement, leading to feelings of disenfranchisement among staff. The consensus approach promotes shared ownership but can result in prolonged decision times, especially problematic when quick responses are needed.

Power Dynamics within the Organization

Within our organization, the most powerful group is the lead teacher and the administrator. The lead teacher holds influence over classroom management and daily routines, while the administrator influences organizational policies and resource allocation. The power stems from their authority formalized through position, expertise, and access to decision-making channels.

This power base is built upon formal authority, experience, and the ability to influence the work environment. The administrator’s power is further reinforced by organizational policies and resource control, which can impact staff satisfaction and operational efficiency.

Perceptions of power disparity do exist among staff. Some aides and support staff might see the lead teacher and administrator as wielding disproportionate influence, potentially causing feelings of marginalization or resentment. This perception can create tension, reduce collaboration, and affect team cohesion if not addressed properly.

To minimize conflicts arising from perceived power imbalances, managers should promote transparency, encourage open communication, and involve all staff in decision-making processes where appropriate. Providing opportunities for aides and support staff to contribute ideas and feedback can foster inclusiveness and reduce feelings of disenfranchisement. Additionally, recognizing and valuing the contributions of all team members helps build a culture of respect and shared leadership.

Conclusion

Effective decision-making and awareness of power dynamics are critical to fostering a positive work environment in educational settings. Employing appropriate decision models according to situational needs enhances organizational efficiency, while understanding and managing power relations contributes to teamwork and organizational harmony. Small organizations, such as my early childhood education team, benefit significantly from transparent processes that promote inclusiveness and respect, thereby supporting both staff satisfaction and quality of care.

References

• Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19-31.
• Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. McGraw-Hill.
• Herberg, F., Medow, B. V., & Campbell, K. (1959). The Motivation to Work. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
• Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice. Sage publications.
• Vroom, V. H., & Yetton, P. W. (1973). Leadership and Decision-Making. University of Pittsburgh Press.
• Argyris, C. (1990). Overcoming Organizational Defenses: Facilitating Organizational Learning. Allyn & Bacon.
• Likert, R. (1967). The Human Organization: Its Management and Value. McGraw-Hill.
• Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of social dilemmas. Journal of Social Issues, 29(2), 137-152.
• Shapiro, J. P. (2014). Collaborative Leadership in Schools: Effective Strategies for Improving Student Outcomes. Corwin Press.
• Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass.