Name PowerPoint Test Instructions 1: Start PowerPoint And

Name Powerpoint Testinstructions1 Start Powerpoint And

Start PowerPoint And

Name________________ PowerPoint Test Instructions 1. Start PowerPoint and open the file Test 1 and save it to your desktop as Your Name PowerPoint Test 1 . 2. Format the slides using the Facet design theme with a blue variant. 3. Go to slide 3 and change the layout to Two Content. 4. Insert an appropriate graphic relating to computers. 5. Create a 3 pt. picture border around the graphic that is any color that matches the chosen picture. 6. Move and size the graphic to fit on the slide without covering any of the text (you may place it anywhere you like) 7. Insert a slide after slide 3. The title will be Advertising. Insert the following information Social Media (main bullet) Facebook (sub-bullet) Twitter (sub-bullet) Radio Commercials (main bullet) Newspapers (main bullet) Dallas Morning News (sub-bullet) Local college papers (sub-bullet) 8. At the end of the presentation insert a new slide. The title of the slide will be User Cost 9. Create a table that is 2 columns by 3 rows 10. Add the following information to the table Basic Premium Pay per download Unlimited downloads $3.99 each $19.. Center the text in the top row of the table. 12. Format the table using the table design Light Style 2-Accent 1. 13. On slide 2 create a banner from shapes that includes the words “#1 Provider”. Change the font to Algerian 24 pt. 14. Change the color of the banner to any green color you want. 15. On slide 4 convert the text to SmartArt using Converging Radial style found in the Relationships section. Change the color to Colorful Range- Accent Colors 2 to 3. Change the SmartArt Style to 3-D Cartoon. 16. Go to slide 2 and insert the following in the speaker note area: “List all the areas where we are the number one provider.” 17. Set a random transition for all slides. 18. Using the slide master, change the heading on all slides to Castellar 36 pt. 19. On slide 2, 3, and 4 animate the bullets to fly in from the left side. 20. Add your name as a footer to the slides. 21. Set the timings for each slide to 5 seconds. 22. Check your spelling and save the presentation. 23. Save the presentation. 24. Set up the PowerPoint to print the presentation as handouts so it prints 6 slides per sheet. Do a screenshot of the backstage print preview. Save the screenshot as Test 1 Print Preview. Submit the files Your Name PowerPoint Test 1 and Test 1 Print Preview in eCampus. Close PowerPoint.

Paper For Above instruction

Commercial aviation has undergone significant evolution in human error management, particularly through the development and implementation of Crew Resource Management (CRM). Originating from the need to reduce accidents caused by human error during the mid-20th century, CRM has served as a crucial approach to enhance flight safety and foster effective team coordination among flight crews. This paper examines the evolution, effectiveness, limitations, and future prospects of CRM within the broader context of human error management in the aviation sector.

Introduction

The history of commercial aviation reveals that human error has been a predominant factor in numerous accidents, notably the Tenerife disaster of 1977, which resulted in the loss of over 500 lives. Such catastrophic events prompted industry-wide reforms emphasizing crew cooperation and communication. Crew Resource Management emerged as a strategy to mitigate human errors by fostering team-based decision-making, effective communication, and resource utilization. It integrates behavioral training to improve human factors contributing to flight safety, shifting focus from individual pilot error to systemic safety culture.

Evolution of CRM and Its Components

Initially introduced as a response to high-profile accidents, CRM has evolved through regulatory mandates, technological advances, and ongoing research. It encompasses key components such as communication skills, decision-making, situational awareness, and teamwork. Modern CRM training involves simulation exercises, scenario-based learning, and assessment of non-technical skills. Regulatory agencies like the FAA and EASA have mandated CRM training for commercial pilots, emphasizing its significance in the safety management systems (SMS).

Effectiveness of CRM

The effectiveness of CRM is measured through accident rates, incident reports, and behavioral assessments. Although the low overall accident rate in commercial aviation makes statistical validation challenging, studies suggest that CRM improves crew communication, reduces misunderstandings, and enhances situational awareness. Helmreich et al. (1996) argued that positive crew attitudes and behaviors, fostered through CRM, correlate with safer flight operations. Furthermore, simulations and peer assessments indicate that CRM-trained crews demonstrate better coordination and conflict resolution capabilities in crisis scenarios (Salas et al., 2006).

Limitations and Challenges

Despite its successes, CRM faces limitations such as cultural barriers, resistance to change, and inconsistent training quality. Cross-cultural differences can influence communication dynamics, especially in multinational crews, leading to misinterpretations and reduced effectiveness (Luttrell et al., 1988). Additionally, some pilots perceive CRM as a bureaucratic requirement rather than a meaningful safety tool, leading to superficial compliance (O’Hare & Sherrer, 1992). The variability in training programs across airlines further complicates the uniform application of CRM principles.

Human Error Management Framework

Integrating CRM within a comprehensive error management framework entails behavior-based strategies aimed at prevention and mitigation. The "ErrorChain" model underscores the importance of proactive detection, error trapping, and correction during flight operations. Tools like the "Troika" method—identify, inform, and correct—are widely adopted to manage active errors. Data collection via confidential reporting programs such as the FAA’s ASRP enables organizations to understand error patterns and improve safety protocols (Kanki, 2019).

Implications for Future Practice

The future of human error management in aviation depends on continual improvement of CRM training, including cultural competence, technological integration, and real-time support systems. Advanced simulators, virtual reality, and artificial intelligence can provide immersive training and real-time decision-making assistance. Furthermore, fostering a safety culture that encourages reporting, openness, and non-punitive responses will reinforce the effectiveness of CRM and error management initiatives. International collaboration and standardization efforts are pivotal to addressing cross-cultural challenges and promoting global aviation safety.

Conclusion

CRM has matured into an indispensable component of aviation safety, emphasizing systemic approaches to minimize human error. While challenges persist, ongoing research, technological advancements, and cultural awareness initiatives can strengthen human error management frameworks. The integration of behavioral strategies, regulatory support, and technological tools promises a safer future for commercial aviation, reducing accident rates and enhancing overall operational safety.

References

• Beck, A. C., Campbell, D., & Shrives, P. J. (2010). Content analysis in environmental reporting research: Enrichment and rehearsal of the method in a British–German context. The British Accounting Review, 42(3), 456-472.
• Bennet, S. A. (2015). Aviation Safety and Security: The Importance of Teamwork, Leadership, Creative Thinking and Active Learning. Libri Publishing Ltd.
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
• Burns, R. B. (2000). Introduction to Research Methods. Sage Publications.
• Garcia, D., & Gluesing, J. C. (2013). Qualitative research methods in international organizational change research. Journal of Organizational Change Management.
• Helmreich, R. L., Merritt, A. C., & Sherman, P. J. (1996). Human Factors and National Culture. ICAO Journal, 51(8), 14-16.
• Hernandez, E. C., & Ferguson, J. M. (2011). The Brady bunch: an examination of disclosure obligations in the civilian federal and military justice systems. Australian Federal Law Review, 67(2), 187–210.
• Kanki, B. G. (2019). Communication and crew resource management. In Crew resource management (pp. 45-67). Academic Press.
• Langer, E. J. (1989). Minding matters: The consequences of mindlessness–mindfulness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 35–62). Academic Press.
• Salas, E., Burke, C. S., Bowers, C. A., & Wilson, K. A. (2006). Does crew resource management training work? An update, an extension, and some critical needs. Human Factors, 48(2), 392–403.