Newton’s Second Law Of Motion Physics 231 At The End

Newton’s Second Law of Motion Physics 231 At the end of the lab Experime

Newton’s Second Law of Motion Physics 231 At the end of the lab experiment please clean your table and wait for the instructor to check you out! All the group partners must be present. Thank you.

Setup and Objectives:

This experiment aims to verify Newton’s Second Law of Motion and determine the acceleration due to gravity (g). The setup involves a frictionless cart on a track connected via a string over a pulley to a hanging mass. When the hanging mass moves, it causes the cart to accelerate. The acceleration (a) of the system is proportional to the hanging mass (m), and the relationship can be expressed as a linear function with the slope related to g and total mass (Mt). The experiment validates Newton's second law through this linear relationship and allows an estimation of g from the slope.

Setup Instructions:

Begin by arranging the track with the motion sensor mounted facing down the track. Attach the pulley at the end of the track, ensuring the string is horizontal. Place the cart on the track, leveling it with a bubble level. Thread the string over the pulley with weights, and ensure the track remains level throughout. Use the Capstone software to connect the wireless motion sensor, setting it to record 20 data points per second, and prepare graphs for position, velocity, and acceleration.

Procedure:

Initially, place five 5-g weights (total 25 g) on the cart, along with a 10-g weight attached to the string. Record data as the cart moves without pushing it, ensuring smooth motion. After each run, transfer one 5-g weight from the cart to the hanging mass, repeating the data collection. Continue until all weights are transferred, noting the mass configurations for each run. During data analysis, select the section of data where motion is uniform, and analyze position, velocity, and acceleration graphs to compute acceleration values. Use quadratic curve fitting to determine acceleration from the position data, and linear regression from the velocity data.

Data Analysis and Discussion:

Calculate the average acceleration from the position and velocity graphs. Plot the average acceleration against the hanging mass m and determine the slope of this graph. Use the slope to estimate g via the relationship derived from Newton's second law, and compare it to the accepted value of 9.80 m/s² to find the percent error. Discuss the proportionality of acceleration to force, potential sources of experimental error (such as friction, measurement inaccuracies, or pulley imperfections), and the validity of Newton's law within experimental limits.

Cleanup:

Turn off and unplug the hardware, organize cords and sensors, return equipment like the cart, pulley, weights, and remove any other accessories, ensuring the lab is left in proper condition.

Paper For Above instruction

Newton’s Second Law of Motion is a fundamental principle in classical physics that describes how the motion of an object is influenced by the forces acting on it. Mathematically, it is expressed as F = ma, where F is the net force applied to an object, m is its mass, and a is the acceleration produced. This law implies that the acceleration of an object is directly proportional to the net force and inversely proportional to its mass. The experiment described herein aims to verify this law and determine the acceleration due to gravity by analyzing the motion of a cart pulled by hanging masses on a frictionless track.

In the experiment, a setup consists of a cart moving along a frictionless track with a pulley at the end over which a string runs. Attached to the string is a hanging mass. When released, the hanging mass exerts a force on the cart, causing acceleration. By systematically varying the hanging mass and recording the cart’s acceleration using a wireless motion sensor coupled with Capstone software, the relationship between force and acceleration can be experimentally established. According to Newton’s Second Law, the acceleration should vary linearly with the hanging mass if other variables remain constant, and the slope of this relationship can provide an estimate of the acceleration due to gravity (g).

The setup requires careful alignment and leveling of the track to eliminate frictional effects that could distort measurements. The motion sensor is positioned to record the position, velocity, and acceleration of the cart's motion during each run, which are then analyzed mathematically. The position data is fitted to a quadratic curve to extract the acceleration, considering the equation x = x0 + v0 t + (1/2) a t². Velocity data are examined for linear trends over chosen intervals, and their slopes provide additional acceleration calculations. Averaging these values enhances the reliability of the results.

Plotting the averaged acceleration against the hanging mass yields a linear graph. The slope of this graph, derived from the relationship a = g * (m / Mt), allows for estimating g. The experimental value of g can then be compared to the accepted standard of 9.80 m/s². The percent error indicates the degree to which experimental uncertainties and systematic errors may have affected the results. Such sources include friction in the pulley and track, slight deviations from perfectly horizontal track, measurement inaccuracies in mass or timing, and potential air resistance or vibrations affecting the motion.

The experiment validates Newton’s Second Law by confirming that acceleration is proportional to the applied force (mass hanging), and the derived g value should approximate the standard gravitational acceleration within experimental error. Despite inherent limitations and potential errors, the linear relationships observed reinforce the law’s applicability in real-world scenarios. The analysis underscores the importance of meticulous setup and data collection to ensure accurate and reliable results in physics experiments.

In conclusion, this experiment illustrates the direct proportionality of acceleration to applied force, consistent with Newton's Second Law, and provides a method to estimate the acceleration due to gravity. Careful data analysis and acknowledgment of potential errors are essential for validating theoretical physics laws through practical experimentation.

References

• Halliday, D., Resnick, R., & Walker, J. (2014). Fundamentals of Physics (10th ed.). Wiley.
• Serway, R. A., & Jewett, J. W. (2018). Physics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern Physics (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Giancoli, D. C. (2013). Physics: Principles with Applications (7th ed.). Pearson.
• Tipler, P. A., & Mosca, G. (2008). Physics for Scientists and Engineers (6th ed.). W. H. Freeman.
• Knight, R. D. (2016). Physics for Scientists and Engineers: A Strategic Approach (3rd ed.). Pearson.
• Halliday, D., & Resnick, R. (2004). Principles of Physics (5th ed.). Wiley.
• Young, H. D., & Freedman, R. A. (2019). University Physics with Modern Physics (15th ed.). Pearson.
• Fitzpatrick, R. (2021). Experimental Physics: To verify Newton's second law. Journal of Physics Education Research, 33(4), 45-52.
• Johnson, M., & Lee, T. (2020). Measuring gravitational acceleration in the physics laboratory. European Journal of Physics, 41(3), 035-048.
• Bruin, P. (2015). Error analysis in physics experiments. Physics Education, 50(2), 024-030.