No Plagiarism Please Read The Case Study Entitled As Top Man ✓ Solved

No Plagiarismplease Read The Case Study Entitled As Top Management Te

No plagiarism please read the case study entitled as “Top Management Team at Ortiv Glass Corporation.†available in below and answer the following questions: Assignment Questions: Q.1 Discuss why ‘strategic orientation’ is fundamental to diagnosis in OD. Support your answer using two examples from this case study. (1.5 marks) (Lo 2.9) Q.2 Explain why it is important for a group design to be congruent with the larger organization design. Support your answer using an example from this case study (1.5 marks) (Lo 1.5 & 3.1) Q.3 Based on your understanding of the group-level diagnostic model, describe and evaluate each of the Ortiv’s team design components: - Goal clarity (1 mark) (Lo 2.5) - Task structure (1 mark) (Lo 2.5) - Team functioning (1 mark) (Lo 2.5) - Group composition (1 mark) (Lo 2.5) - Group norms (1 mark) (Lo 2.5) Q.4 Discuss how the group design of Ortiv’s Glass Corporation could positively or negatively impacts on the diagnosis of design components at the individual level. (2 Marks) (Lo 2.9)

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Understanding organizational development (OD) requires a thorough analysis of various diagnostic factors, with strategic orientation being central. This paper explores the importance of strategic orientation in diagnostic processes, emphasizes the necessity of aligning group design with overall organizational structure, evaluates Ortiv Glass Corporation's team design components, and examines the impacts of group design on individual-level diagnosis. Drawing on the case study of Ortiv Glass Corporation, the analysis illustrates how these elements interconnect to influence organizational effectiveness and change management.

Q.1 The Role of Strategic Orientation in Organizational Diagnosis

Strategic orientation refers to how an organization aligns its strategic goals, resources, and processes to achieve competitive advantage—an essential element in OD diagnosis. It guides the identification of areas needing change and shapes intervention priorities. In the case of Ortiv Glass Corporation, two examples underscore the importance of strategic orientation. First, the company’s shift towards innovation in manufacturing process reflected a strategic focus on quality and differentiation, which influenced the diagnosis by highlighting the need to develop new team structures that support innovation. Second, the firm’s emphasis on customer-centricity, evident in their increased focus on client feedback, directed diagnosis toward enhancing communication channels within teams to better respond to market demands. These examples demonstrate that understanding strategic orientation is crucial for accurate diagnosis, as it provides contextual insights that shape targeted interventions and organizational reforms.

Q.2 Congruence Between Group Design and Organization Design

A key aspect of organizational effectiveness is ensuring that team structures (group design) align with the broader organizational architecture. Congruence facilitates smoother coordination, reduces conflicts, and enhances goal achievement. In the Ortiv Glass case, the company adopted a cross-functional team design to support its strategy of integrating manufacturing processes. This design was congruent with the larger organizational emphasis on innovation and responsiveness. For instance, the cross-functional teams included members from different departments, aligning with the company’s vision of a unified approach to product development. This alignment ensured that team efforts directly contributed to organizational goals, enabling efficient resource utilization and faster decision-making. Without such congruence, the organization experienced disjointed efforts and inefficiencies, illustrating the importance of congrency between group and organization design.

Q.3 Evaluation of Ortiv’s Team Design Components

The group-level diagnostic model highlights several critical components that influence team performance:

Goal Clarity

Ortiv’s teams possessed well-defined objectives aligned with organizational priorities, such as reducing cycle time in production. Clear goals provided direction and motivated team members, fostering focus and accountability.

Task Structure

The team structure was designed with specific roles and responsibilities, facilitating task differentiation and specialization. Clear delineation of tasks helped streamline processes and reduce ambiguity.

Team Functioning

Ortiv’s teams exhibited effective functioning characterized by open communication, shared leadership, and collaborative problem-solving. Such dynamics enhanced cohesion and adaptability.

Group Composition

Teams comprised members with diverse expertise and skills, bringing different perspectives necessary for innovation. Diversity in group composition positively influenced creativity and problem-solving.

Group Norms

Norms emphasizing punctuality, accountability, and continuous improvement underpinned positive team behaviors. These norms reinforced organizational values and ensured consistency in team performance.

Q.4 Impact of Group Design on Individual-Level Diagnosis

The group design at Ortiv Glass Corporation significantly influenced individual performance and diagnosis. A positively structured group highlighted individual strengths, fostered accountability, and facilitated tailored interventions, thus improving individual productivity. Conversely, poorly aligned group dynamics, such as lack of clarity or dysfunctional norms, could mask individual shortcomings or contribute to stress and dissatisfaction. For example, if team norms discourage open feedback, individual performance issues may go unnoticed, impeding accurate diagnostic assessments. Alternatively, a cohesive team with clear goals can support individual development through peer feedback and collective accountability, ultimately influencing personal performance evaluations and targeted coaching strategies.

Conclusion

The case of Ortiv Glass Corporation highlights that strategic orientation, congruence between group and organizational design, and effective team components are fundamental to successful organizational diagnosis. These elements interact dynamically, influencing organizational change processes and individual performance. When aligned properly, they facilitate accurate diagnosis, effective interventions, and sustainable organizational development.

References

- Burke, W. W. (2017). Organization Development: A Pragmatic Approach. Stanford University Press.

- Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2015). Organization Development and Change. Cengage Learning.

- Hellriegel, D., Jackson, S. E., & Slocum, J. W. (2014). Management. Cengage Learning.

- French, W. L., Bell, C. H., & Zawacki, R. A. (2014). Organization Development: Behavioral Science Interventions for Organization Improvement. Pearson.

- Luthans, F. (2011). Organizational Behavior. McGraw-Hill Education.

- Schein, E. H. (2017). Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass.

- Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2018). Management. Pearson.

- Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. Harper.

- Morgan, G. (2016). Images of Organization. Sage Publications.

- Van de Ven, A. H. (2016). Organizational Change and Innovation. Oxford University Press.