Nordstrom's Performance Goals: This Case Focuses On T 355549

Nordstroms Performance Goalsthis Case Focuses On The Issue Of Perform

Nordstrom’s performance goals and management strategies revolve around creating an environment that emphasizes extraordinary customer service as the central performance metric. The company’s unique approach involves setting clear goals, fostering transparency among employees, and implementing reward systems that motivate associates to deliver exceptional service that translates into increased sales and profits. This paper explores the positive impacts of Nordstrom’s open performance environment, evaluates the reinforcement schedule used by the company, and compares it to other reinforcement strategies, with insights from personal or observed experiences.

Paper For Above instruction

Nordstrom’s approach to performance management is distinguished by its emphasis on transparency and open communication, particularly regarding sales figures among associates. This strategy fosters a competitive yet collaborative environment that can significantly enhance employee motivation and overall performance. The transparency of sales data allows associates to have an accurate understanding of their performance relative to their peers, creating a culture of accountability and self-improvement. Such openness can boost positive impacts, including increased motivation, engagement, and a sense of fairness among employees.

One of the primary benefits of this transparency is the cultivation of a high-performance culture driven by internal competition. When associates see how they compare to others, they are often motivated to improve their individual performance, particularly if rewards are tied to these metrics. This creates a healthy, creative tension that pushes employees to strive for excellence without resorting to destructive rivalry. Furthermore, this open environment promotes a sense of fairness, as everyone has access to the same performance information, reducing perceptions of bias or favoritism.

Additionally, the availability of sales figures fosters a sense of shared accountability and team spirit. Associates recognize that their individual efforts contribute to collective success, which can reinforce collaboration and mutual support. For example, top performers are celebrated not just as individuals but also as part of a team that collectively elevates the store’s performance. This blend of individual achievement and team cooperation aligns with Nordstrom’s culture of extraordinary service, encouraging associates to learn from each other and continuously improve their skills.

Moreover, the clarity of performance expectations and the visibility of results support ongoing feedback and coaching. Associates are able to identify areas for improvement promptly, enabling management to provide targeted support. This real-time feedback loop enhances employee development and maintains high standards of service quality. Overall, Nordstrom’s transparent approach to sales performance fosters intrinsic motivation, accountability, and a culture of excellence that benefits both employees and the organization.

Regarding the reinforcement schedule used by Nordstrom—regularly releasing sales figures and awarding top performers twice a month—this strategy aligns with a fixed interval reinforcement schedule, where rewards are provided after a set period based on performance metrics. From a motivational perspective, this schedule offers tangible incentives that can motivate employees to sustain high performance over time. Regular updates and rewards serve to reinforce desired behaviors consistently, maintaining momentum and focus among associates.

However, whether this is the optimal reinforcement schedule for all employees may be subject to debate. Some employees respond best to immediate reinforcement, where rewards follow shortly after the behavior, which these bi-monthly updates do not fully provide. The delay between performance and reward may diminish the reinforcement’s impact for some individuals, potentially resulting in decreased motivation or a disconnect between effort and recognition. Additionally, the competitive nature fostered by this schedule could cause negative consequences for some employees, such as increased stress, unhealthy rivalry, or discouragement among lower performers.

Alternative reinforcement strategies could include a mix of immediate and delayed rewards. For example, immediate verbal acknowledgment or small monetary incentives for daily or weekly achievements could complement the bi-monthly rewards, providing more consistent reinforcement. This approach would cater to different motivational preferences, such as intrinsic motivation or the desire for instant recognition. Furthermore, employing a variable ratio schedule—where rewards are given unpredictably after different performance milestones—could maintain high engagement levels by leveraging the psychological effects of unpredictability, which tend to produce sustained effort and persistence.

Personal or observed examples of reinforcement schedules reveal varying outcomes. For instance, in a retail environment I observed, employees received immediate verbal praise for excellent customer service, such as a manager acknowledging specific helpful behaviors during shifts. Occasionally, employees earned small monetary bonuses for meeting sales targets on a weekly basis. This combination of immediate praise and periodic rewards created a positive reinforcement pattern, encouraging employees to deliver consistent service quality. The outcome was predominantly positive, with heightened motivation, better customer interactions, and increased sales. Nevertheless, when rewards were inconsistent or delayed without follow-up, motivation waned, and some employees felt discouraged or disengaged, highlighting the importance of aligning reinforcement schedules with individual and organizational needs.

In conclusion, Nordstrom’s transparent and performance-driven environment offers many benefits, including increased motivation, accountability, and a culture of excellence. While the bi-monthly reinforcement schedule effectively motivates many associates, integrating additional reinforcement strategies—such as immediate recognition or variable schedules—could optimize motivation and reduce potential negative effects. Recognizing the diverse motivational needs of employees and tailoring reinforcement approaches accordingly can lead to better performance outcomes, higher job satisfaction, and sustained organizational success.

References

• Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668.
• Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (2011). The motivation to work. Transaction Publishers.
• Latham, G. P., & Pinder, C. C. (2005). Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 485–516.
• Kuvaas, B. (2006). Performance appraisal satisfaction and employee outcomes: Mediating and moderating roles of work motivation. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(3), 504–522.
• Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. Free Press.
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.
• Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. Wiley.
• Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and practice. Pearson.
• Grant, A. M. (2008). The significance of task significance: Job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 108–124.
• Pinder, C. C. (2014). Work motivation in organizational behavior. Psychology Press.