Note: Refer To The Instructions For Citrix In The Cou 225341

Note Refer To The Instructions For Citrix In The Course Materialsthe

NOTE: Refer to the Instructions for Citrix in the Course Materials. The purpose of this assignment is to create a work breakdown structure (WBS) for a given project. Specifically, complete Case 4.1: Manchester United Soccer Club in Larson and Gray. In addition to the items requested for Question 1 in the case, complete the following for Question 1 using Microsoft Project: Create a list of tasks in Microsoft Project. At a minimum, 30 lowest-level tasks are required. Using Microsoft Project’s task indent tool, create a WBS for your project. Include summary tasks to effectively identify the key areas of work for the project. Ensure that the WBS column is displayed. Respond to Questions 2, 3 and 4 in the case. Ensure each response includes at least 100 words. APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected. While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment involves developing a comprehensive work breakdown structure (WBS) for the project concerning the Manchester United Soccer Club, based on Case 4.1 from Larson and Gray. The primary goal is to systematically identify and organize all tasks involved in the project, ensuring a detailed breakdown that facilitates effective project management and oversight.

To begin with, students are instructed to utilize Microsoft Project to create a list of at least 30 low-level tasks relevant to the project. These tasks should be detailed and specific, addressing various facets of the soccer club project—such as facility development, player acquisition, marketing, sponsorship, and operational planning. Using Microsoft Project’s task indent feature, students will organize these tasks into a hierarchical structure, forming the WBS. This structure should include key summary tasks that group related activities into broader categories, providing a clear overview of major work areas. Ensuring the WBS column is visible will assist in proper documentation and clarity of the task hierarchy.

Beyond constructing the WBS, students are required to respond to questions 2, 3, and 4 from the case study. Each response must be at least 100 words, emphasizing clarity, coherence, and academic rigor in writing. Although APA formatting is not mandatory in the body of the assignment, proper citations and references following APA style are expected, supporting the academic integrity and credibility of the work.

This assignment emphasizes both technical skill in project planning tools like Microsoft Project and critical thinking about project management principles. Reviewing the grading rubric beforehand ensures understanding of the expectations for completeness, accuracy, and analytical depth. Overall, this task aims to develop students’ ability to structure complex projects effectively and articulate their insights with professionalism and scholarly rigor.

References

  • Larson, E. W., & Gray, C. F. (2018). Project Management: The Managerial Process (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  • PMI. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (6th ed.). Project Management Institute.
  • Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling (12th ed.). Wiley.
  • Soderlund, J., & Larsson, C. (2003). A Conceptual Framework for Implementing Project Management Models. International Journal of Project Management, 21(1), 7-13.
  • Thamhain, H. J. (2013). Managing Technology-Based Projects: Tools, Techniques, and Skills. Wiley.
  • Meredith, J. R., & Mantel, S. J. (2014). Project Management: A Managerial Approach (8th ed.). Wiley.
  • Heldman, K. (2018). Project Management JumpStart (3rd ed.). Wiley.
  • Schwalbe, K. (2018). Information Technology Project Management (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Wysocki, R. K. (2014). Effective Project Management: Traditional, Agile, Extreme (7th ed.). Wiley.
  • Gido, J., & Clements, J. (2017). Successful Project Management (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Related Assignments