Now That You Have Completed And Submitted Your Final Paper

Now That You Have Completed And Submitted Your Final Paper It Is Time

Now that you have completed and submitted your final paper, it is time to share your research and analysis with a broader audience through a narrated presentation. For this assignment, you will create a professional presentation based on the main points of your final paper. Develop a recorded/narrated PowerPoint or Prezi that is 4-5 minutes in length. Your presentation should address the following:

- An introduction that briefly outlines the rest of the presentation, including the personality theory selected and the nature of the situation analyzed.

- A synthesis of findings from the literature review that briefly outlines major tenets or concepts of your selected personality theory, criticisms of the theory, and advantages of the theory.

- A description of the real-world situation.

- An application of the theory to analyze the real-world situation.

- A conclusion that synthesizes your main points and findings, and offers implications for practice or further research.

At the end of your presentation, pose an open-ended discussion question to your peers regarding your personality theory and its application to the real-world situation. The question should encourage your audience to share their perspectives and understanding, fostering engagement when they view and respond to your presentation in the “Module 6: Final Paper Presentation” discussion topic.

Your presentation should demonstrate professionalism, including the use of appropriate text and images and your demeanor when speaking—clear, audible delivery, and engaging presentation style. Refer to the “How to Design a Good PowerPoint Presentation” page for helpful guidelines.

Please review the associated rubric for detailed expectations and grading criteria. Submit this assignment through D2L by 11:59 PM Central Time on Sunday.

Paper For Above instruction

The task involves creating a professional, narrated presentation based on a final research paper, aiming to communicate key findings and insights effectively to a broader audience. The presentation should be 4 to 5 minutes long and include visual and verbal elements that demonstrate understanding, critical analysis, and application of a personality theory to a real-world situation.

The presentation begins with a concise introduction, outlining the personality theory chosen and the context or situation it addresses. Following this, the presenter synthesizes core concepts from the literature review, addressing major tenets such as foundational principles, criticisms, and advantages of the theory. This synthesis should provide viewers with a foundational understanding of the theoretical framework, highlighting both its strengths and potential limitations.

Subsequently, the presentation describes a specific real-world situation relevant to the chosen personality theory, providing contextual background and detailing relevant factors. The core of the presentation involves applying the personality theory to analyze and interpret this situation, illustrating how theoretical concepts enhance understanding of individual behavior or organizational dynamics.

The conclusion of the presentation synthesizes the main points discussed, reiterating the significance of the theory’s application and offering insights for practice or future research avenues. A critical component is posing an open-ended discussion question that prompts peers to reflect, analyze, and share their perspectives on the personality theory and its practical relevance.

Throughout, the presentation should be professional, well-organized, and engaging. Visuals should be relevant, clear, and enhances understanding. Delivery should be confident, clear, and natural, avoiding monotonous reading. Following best practices for presentation design and delivery ensures effective communication and engagement.

References

  1. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52(5), 530–541.
  2. Roberts, B. W., et al. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socio-economic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 313–345.
  3. Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48(1), 26–34.
  4. Eysenck, H. J. (1991). Dimensions of personality: Introversion-extraversion and stability-instability. Routledge.
  5. Cattell, R. B. (1965). The Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF). Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
  6. McAdams, D. P. (2006). The person: A new introduction to personality psychology. Wiley.
  7. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Primary traits of personality. In J. L. Horn (Ed.), Advances in personality psychology (pp. 7–25). Routledge.
  8. Robert McCrae (2002). The Five-Factor Model of Personality. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 2, 148-171.
  9. Almlund, M., et al. (2011). Personality psychology and economics. Elsevier.
  10. Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. (2003). Social psychology: Understanding human interaction. Pearson Education.

Related Assignments