Now That You Know A Bit More About Over Reliance On Quant
Now That You Know A Bit More About The Over Reliance On Quantitative M
Now that you know a bit more about the over-reliance on quantitative methods in the field of Human Performance Technology (HPT) and the widespread use of written questionnaires, discuss why the type of methodology employed should be driven by the research questions rather than being selected because of preconceived notions about scientific rigor. Make sure to justify your answer to this question based on your research. Support your opinion by referencing sources such as internet research. Be sure to cite your sources using APA format. 300 words No plagiarism
Paper For Above instruction
The predominance of quantitative methodologies in Human Performance Technology (HPT) research has raised concerns regarding the alignment between research questions and chosen methods. While quantitative approaches, such as surveys and written questionnaires, are frequently used due to perceptions of objectivity and scientific rigor, this preference can sometimes overshadow the importance of tailoring methodology to specific research questions. Methodology should be driven by the nature of the inquiry rather than preconceived notions of scientific superiority. Research questions fundamentally determine whether qualitative or quantitative methods are most appropriate; forcing a particular methodology can compromise the depth and validity of findings.
Quantitative methods excel at capturing measurable data and identifying patterns across larger populations. However, they often overlook contextual nuances vital to understanding complex human behaviors within HPT (Creswell, 2014). Conversely, qualitative approaches provide rich, detailed insights into individual experiences, motivations, and organizational culture, which are central to many HPT contexts (Patton, 2015). For instance, when exploring employees' perceptions of a new training program, a qualitative approach might yield more meaningful understanding than a purely quantitative survey. Selecting a methodology based solely on notions of scientific rigor—often associated with quantification—risks neglecting these contextual factors and reduces the depth of analysis.
Recent literature emphasizes the importance of methodological congruence with research questions to enhance validity and relevance (Johnson & Onwuegbuzie, 2004). Mixed methods, integrating qualitative and quantitative strategies, are also recommended for comprehensive insights. Ultimately, research should prioritize the most suitable methodology aligned with the specific question rather than defaulting to one perceived as more scientifically rigorous. This approach ensures richer, more applicable results crucial for advancing practice in HPT.
References
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. Sage Publications.
Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making Sense of Qualitative Data. Sage Publications.
Mertens, D. M. (2014). Research & Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity With Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods. Sage Publications.
Vignesh, R. (2019). Choosing right research methodology: Quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods. International Journal of Scientific Research, 8(2), 572–574.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (5th ed.). Sage Publications.