Now That You've Finished Watching A Video On The Workshoppin

Now That Youve Finished Watching A Video On The Workshopping Process

Now that you've finished watching a video on the workshopping process, let's put what you learned to practice! On this page and the next, you'll use a guide to help workshop one of your peer's submissions of Assignment 1: Annotations and Writing Plan, focusing specifically on source summary, credibility, and your peer's main argument. As stated in the video, it's important to be honest and thorough during the workshopping process. Your job is to help your peer determine how clear their intended argument is and how well the sources they have found support that argument. To complete this workshop activity, follow the steps below: Copy and paste your Annotations and Writing Plan into the discussion forum below to create your initial post by Thursday, 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone. While in the discussion forum, select a post made by another student to workshop. Once you have selected the Annotations and Writing Plan you will workshop, leave a note in reply to your peer's discussion thread. Now you're ready to walk through the workshopping process! Read through your peer's post carefully, and then answer the following questions in a response post by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone: In your own words, identify the argument of your peer's persuasive essay. What are they aiming to prove? Has your peer adequately addressed opposing viewpoints? Which of the summaries (or which sections of the summaries) could use more clarification? How could your peer's summaries be improved? Please paste an example and, if appropriate, offer your own edits. Has your peer provided adequate credentialing information? If so, how can you tell the source is credible? If not, what could your peer add to note the reliability of the source? Do the sources your peer describes in the annotated bibliography connect to their argument in a clear and easy-to-understand manner? If so, how so? If not, what are some ways in which your peer could strengthen those connections? Does your peer acknowledge a counter-argument in one of the annotations? If a counterargument is presented, do they provide a persuasive rebuttal? If no counterargument is presented, can you anticipate some of the objections your peer should take into consideration? Evaluate the sources your peer has selected. Which sources do you find to be the strongest? Why do you think they are strong, and how do they support your peer's key points? Are there ways the sources could support those key points that your peer has overlooked? Be specific. Before you begin writing, please review the writing workshop discussion rubric below to make sure you fulfill all of the required tasks in your response.

Paper For Above instruction

The process of effective workshopping academic writing involves careful analysis and constructive feedback that aims to refine a peer’s argument and supporting evidence. In this specific context, students are asked to critically evaluate a peer’s submission of their Assignment 1: Annotations and Writing Plan, focusing on the clarity of their main argument, the support provided by sources, the credibility of those sources, and the inclusion of counterarguments or perspectives. This collaborative exercise not only helps strengthen individual writing skills but also fosters a deeper understanding of how to construct persuasive, evidence-based arguments.

The first step involves comprehensively reading the peer’s submitted plan to understand their thesis or main argument. It is essential to assess whether the argument is explicitly stated and logically supported by the annotations and summaries they have provided. A clear, focused thesis makes it easier for readers to follow and evaluate the strength of the evidence presented. Additionally, identifying whether opposing viewpoints or counterarguments are acknowledged and adequately rebutted can significantly enhance the overall persuasiveness of the essay.

Next, attention should be directed towards evaluating the sources cited in the annotated bibliography. Credibility is critical; sources should be authoritative, current, and relevant to the research topic. When sources are credible, it is apparent through clear credentialing and proper citation, contributing to the overall reliability of the argument. If the sources lack clear credentials, suggestions can be made to include author bios, publication details, or other indicators of trustworthiness.

Furthermore, it is important to analyze how well the sources connect to and support the central argument. The annotations should demonstrate how each source contributes to proving the thesis or advancing the essay’s main points. If these connections are weak or unclear, recommendations can be made to clarify these linkages with specific references or quotations from the sources.

Finally, the critique should address whether the submitted plan accounts for counterarguments or alternative perspectives. Effectively acknowledging and rebutting counterpoints showcases intellectual rigor and thoroughness in the research process. Strengthening these areas can significantly improve the persuasive power of the final essay.

References

• Bean, J. C. (2011). Engaging Ideas: The Professor's Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom. John Wiley & Sons.
• Gordon, L. (2010). Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric and Reader. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Hacker, D., & Sommers, N. (2016). A Writer's Reference. Bedford/St. Martin's.
• Lunsford, A. A., & Ruszckowski, C. (2013). The Everyday Writer. Bedford/St. Martin's.
• Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2006). Introduction to Academic Writing. Pearson Longman.
• Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic Writing for Graduate Students. University of Michigan Press.
• Turabian, K. L. (2018). A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations. University of Chicago Press.
• Walters, T., & Seow, A. (2014). Writing in the Disciplines. Bedford/St. Martin's.
• Williams, J. M. (2010). Style: Lessons in Clarity and Grace. Pearson.
• Zinsser, W. (2001). On Writing Well: The Classic Guide to Writing Nonfiction. Harper Collins.