NRNP/PRAC 6665 & 6675 Focused SOAP Psychiatric Evalua 247232

NRNP/PRAC 6665 & 6675 Focused SOAP Psychiatric Evaluation Exemplar INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO USE EXEMPLAR AND TEMPLATE—READ CAREFULLY

Follow the Focused SOAP Note Evaluation Template and Rubric as your guide. In the Subjective section, include: chief complaint, history of present illness (HPI), past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnoses, pertinent substance use, family psychiatric/substance use history, social and medical history, allergies, and review of systems (ROS).

In the Objective section, document: physical exam relevant to the chief complaint, HPI, and history; diagnostic results such as labs, imaging, or other assessments needed for differential diagnoses.

In the Assessment section, provide: mental status examination in paragraph form; at least three differential diagnoses supported by evidence, ordered from top priority to least; comparison of DSM-5-TR criteria ruling in or out each differential; explanation of your critical-thinking process leading to the primary diagnosis; and pertinent positives and negatives.

In the Reflection, discuss what you learned, what you might do differently, legal/ethical considerations beyond confidentiality and consent, social determinants of health, health promotion, disease prevention, and patient factors (age, ethnicity, PMH, risk factors).

The note is typically a follow-up psychiatric evaluation focusing on symptoms that support narrowing from a comprehensive assessment to the primary diagnosis, demonstrating your evaluation of symptoms like anxiety, depression, bipolar, psychosis, substance use, etc.

Paper For Above instruction

The focused psychiatric evaluation is a critical component of mental health practice, requiring a meticulous and structured approach to gather relevant information, assess mental status, formulate differential diagnoses, and develop an effective treatment plan. This paper emphasizes the importance of adhering to a structured SOAP format, driven by evidence-based guidelines, to ensure comprehensive patient assessment and management.

Introduction

The use of SOAP notes—Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan—is foundational in psychiatric documentation. They facilitate clarity in clinical communication, support diagnostic accuracy, and underpin therapeutic decision-making. Particularly in focused follow-up visits, these notes enable clinicians to monitor symptom evolution, treatment response, and adjust management strategies accordingly. This paper illustrates how to execute an effective focused SOAP psychiatric evaluation, highlighting critical thinking processes and integration of evidence-based practices for accurate diagnosis and patient-centered care.

Subjective Data Collection

The subjective section begins with a precise chief complaint, conveyed verbatim from the patient or family member in cases of cognitive impairment. For example, a patient may state, "I'm feeling very anxious and can't sleep," directly capturing the core concern. The HPI then elaborates on onset, duration, severity, frequency, and impact on functioning. An example includes: "Ms. A, a 28-year-old woman, reports experiencing persistent anxiety for the past three months, worsened in social situations, causing difficulty performing daily activities."

Additional history encompasses past psychiatric diagnoses, medication adherence history, psychotherapy engagement, substance use, allergies, reproductive history, and relevant social and medical background. A detailed ROS ensures comprehensive coverage of body systems to identify symptoms supporting or excluding differential diagnoses, aiding in establishing a holistic view of the patient's condition.

Objective Data Collection

The objective component involves documenting vital signs, physical exam findings pertinent to the presenting problem, and diagnostic results. For example, lab tests may include thyroid function tests to evaluate for hypothyroidism contributing to depressive symptoms, or toxicology screens to rule out substance use as a cause of psychiatric manifestations.

Maintaining meticulous records of these findings ensures evidence-based decision-making and supports differential diagnoses.

Assessment and Mental Status Examination

The assessment section integrates mental status exam findings, presented in paragraph form to describe appearance, attitude, behavior, mood, affect, speech, thought processes, thought content, perceptions, cognition, insight, judgment, and suicidal or homicidal ideation. For instance: "Mr. B appeared well-groomed, cooperative, and alert. His speech was normal, mood reported as depressed, with flat affect. Thought process was logical, and no perceptual disturbances were noted. Cognition was intact, insight was limited, and judgment appeared fair."

From this, the clinician formulates differential diagnoses supported by DSM-5-TR criteria, considering pertinent positives and negatives. For example, persistent depressed mood and anhedonia support Major Depressive Disorder, while ruling out bipolar disorder if no episodes of mania are present.

Differential Diagnosis and CriticalThinking

Three differential diagnoses might include Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD), and Bipolar Disorder. Each is supported by symptom patterns: MDD with persistent low mood, anhedonia, and fatigue; GAD with excessive worry, restlessness, and muscle tension; Bipolar disorder with episodes of elevated mood or irritability (if present). Comparing DSM-5-TR criteria helps rule out each diagnosis: absence of manic/hypomanic episodes rules out bipolar; if worry is pervasive and persists over six months, GAD is favored, but if mood episodes are identified, bipolar becomes more likely.

The primary diagnosis is selected based on symptom frequency, duration, severity, and functional impairment, supported by clinical judgment and evidence. For instance, if the patient exhibits persistent depressed mood without episodes of elevated mood, MDD is the primary diagnosis. Consideration of comorbidities and differential features further refines this.

Reflections and Ethical Considerations

Reflection involves evaluating diagnostic accuracy, personal learning, and potential biases. For example, learning to differentiate mood episodes versus anxiety symptoms enhances clinical judgment. Ethical considerations extend beyond confidentiality, including cultural competence, trauma-informed care, and respecting patient autonomy. Social determinants such as socioeconomic status, cultural background, and access to care influence presentation and treatment engagement.

Health promotion and disease prevention encompass educating patients on medication adherence, lifestyle modifications, and destigmatizing mental health. Tailoring interventions to cultural and age-specific needs improves outcomes. Addressing social risks, such as housing instability or unemployment, forms part of a holistic treatment approach.

Case Formulation and Treatment Plan

The plan integrates pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic strategies aligned with the diagnosis. For MDD, initiated selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) therapy with an explanation of benefits, potential side effects, and monitoring parameters. Psychotherapy options, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), are recommended. Health promotion activities include exercise and sleep hygiene education.

Follow-up involves regular monitoring for medication efficacy, side effects, and symptom progression. Additional referrals may include therapy services or social work for addressing social determinants. Emergency plans, such as crisis lines and instructions for acute deterioration, are clearly communicated.

Documented in the plan are diagnostic studies, follow-up schedules, patient education strategies, and collaborative care considerations ensuring comprehensive management tailored to the patient's needs and circumstances.

Conclusion

Executing a focused SOAP psychiatric evaluation requires a systematic, evidence-guided approach. It emphasizes careful history-taking, thorough mental status assessment, critical analysis of differential diagnoses, and development of individualized treatment plans. Reflective practice and awareness of ethical, social, and cultural factors are integral to delivering effective, patient-centered mental health care. Mastery of these skills ensures improvements in diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic outcomes for diverse patient populations.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.; DSM-5-TR). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.
  • Frances, A. (2013). Saving normal: An insider's revolt against out-of-control psychiatric diagnosis, DSM-5, big pharma, and the medicalization of ordinary life. William Morrow Paperbacks.
  • Kessler, R.C., & Bromet, E.J. (2013). The epidemiology of depression across cultures. Annual Review of Public Health, 34, 119-138. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031811-124605
  • NICE. (2019). Depression in adults: Recognition and management. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng222
  • Zimmerman, M., & Mattia, J. (2008). Major depression in symptoms assessment instruments: limitations and alternatives. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 69(3), 7-12. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.08114su1c
  • Khopkar, M., & Mahajan, M. (2019). Psychopathology and differential diagnosis in psychiatric practice. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 61(Suppl 2), S255–S262. https://doi.org/10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_612_18
  • Lasser, R., & Soliman, A. (2019). Evidence-based approaches to adult depression. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 25(4), 271-280. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRA.0000000000000387
  • Thase, M.E., & Frank, E. (2011). Bipolar disorder: Diagnostic and management considerations. The Medical Clinics of North America, 95(4), 727-744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2011.02.005
  • Olfson, M., & Marcus, S.C. (2010). National trends in outpatient mental health services and medication management. Psychiatric Services, 61(2), 100-108. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.2010.61.2.100
  • Hickie, I., & Scott, J. (2018). Managing depression in primary care: Opportunities and challenges. The Medical Journal of Australia, 209(4), 174-179. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.12086

Related Assignments