NSG/482 V4 Windshield Survey Template

NSG/482 v4 Windshield Survey Template NSG/482 v4 Windshield Survey Template Data Overview

Identify the strengths of community as evidenced by Windshield Survey. Describe the weaknesses (gaps in service) as evidenced by Windshield Survey. Identify 1 problem based on the identified gap in community resources as an indicator of potential poor health outcomes.

Paper For Above instruction

The community assessed through the windshield survey exhibits several notable strengths that promote public health and social well-being. Foremost among these is the community’s manageability due to its small size; the limited geographic scope facilitates easier coordination of health interventions, rapid dissemination of information, and localized emergency response. This manageable boundary also enhances community cohesion, fostering stronger social networks and collective action toward health promotion. Additionally, the community boasts environmental cleanliness, characterized by a lack of trash, rubble, and large dumpsters, which reduces vectors that propagate disease. Parks and recreational areas are well-maintained, providing residents with venues to engage in physical activity, socialize, and enjoy healthy lifestyles. The presence of diverse grocery stores offering fresh, healthy foods further supports nutritional wellness, especially important for preventing diet-related chronic conditions such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The community’s emphasis on active transportation, such as walking and bicycling, is another strength that promotes physical activity and environmental conservation. Social services, including adult and elderly care programs, demonstrate an infrastructure aimed at protecting vulnerable populations, although access to a single hospital underscores a potential gap in emergency responsiveness. Security measures, including police patrols and fire services, contribute to overall community safety, despite moderate crime levels that suggest room for improvement. The demographic diversity encompassing different races, ethnicities, and religions enriches the social fabric, fostering intercultural understanding that can be leveraged for community health initiatives. The predominantly upper-class socioeconomic status allows most residents to afford nutritious foods and healthcare, reducing disparities and health inequalities. The median age of 44 years indicates a relatively active, middle-aged population capable of contributing positively to the community’s productivity and health initiatives. However, approximately 20% of the population comprises elderly individuals over 65 years, which introduces specific vulnerabilities related to age-associated health risks.

Despite these strengths, the community exhibits several weaknesses or gaps in services that could adversely influence health outcomes. Notably, the presence of abandoned and disrepair structures such as factories and schools signals underutilization of resources and potential environmental hazards, such as unsafe structures or contaminated sites. Although the community is overall clean, the existence of bordered-up buildings and abandoned cars presents safety risks and potential sites for illegal activities. The limited healthcare infrastructure, with only one general hospital, poses a significant barrier for timely access to emergency and specialty care, especially for residents living in more distant areas of the community. This limited access may result in adverse health outcomes if residents are unable to receive prompt treatment during critical health events. While parks promote physical activity, during pandemics such as COVID-19, these communal spaces posed health risks due to the potential for disease transmission, indicating a lack of adaptable recreational spaces that balance activity and safety. The community’s transportation reliance on cars reduces opportunities for physical activity, contributing to sedentary lifestyles and associated health problems like obesity and metabolic syndrome. Moreover, certain social venues like nightclubs and bars, while contributing to social cohesion, may encourage unhealthy behaviors, including excessive alcohol consumption and smoking, which are risk factors for liver disease and cancers. Access disparities are also evident among diverse ethnic and religious groups, which, although valued for cultural richness, may inadvertently create social barriers that limit access to services or participation in community activities, thus increasing social isolation risks. The aging segment of the population faces particular challenges, with inadequate specialized healthcare, social support, and age-friendly infrastructure, potentially leading to unchecked chronic diseases and diminished quality of life.

A critical problem emerging from these community gaps is the high proportion of elderly residents, approximately 20% of the population, who are vulnerable to age-related health issues. This demographic faces increased risks of chronic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, arthritis, and cardiovascular conditions. Without adequate healthcare services, social support programs, and age-friendly infrastructure, this population is at higher risk for adverse health outcomes, including hospitalization, functional decline, and even premature mortality. This potential health crisis underscores the need for targeted community health interventions to address the specific needs of the aging population, improve access to preventive care, and foster community environments that support healthy aging. Addressing this gap is essential to prevent escalation of chronic illnesses and ensure that the elderly community maintains dignity, independence, and quality of life, ultimately contributing to the overall health resilience of the community.

References

• Baker, S. (2020). Community health assessment practices: A review. Journal of Public Health, 112(3), 235-242.
• CDC. (2021). Community health assessment and improvement planning. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/publichealthgateway/cha/plan.html
• Kumar, S., & Preetha, G. (2012). Health Promotion: An Effective Tool for Global Health. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 37(1), 5–12.
• Levesque, J. F., et al. (2013). Patient-centred access to healthcare: Conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations. International Journal for Equity in Health, 12, 18.
• Milio, S. (2019). Social determinants of health and community health: An overview. Community Medicine & Health Education, 9(2), 1-7.
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2015). Integrating Social Care into the Delivery of Health Care. The National Academies Press.
• Shaw, S., et al. (2011). An overview of effective approaches to improving access to healthcare. Patient Education and Counseling, 84(2), 137-143.
• World Health Organization. (2010). A Conceptual Framework for Action on the Social Determinants of Health. WHO.
• Yinger, N., et al. (2018). Strategies to Promote Active Aging. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 30(3), 197-215.
• Zhao, Y., et al. (2020). Addressing Healthcare Disparities in Aging Populations. Geriatrics, 5(2), 14.