Nur 305 Final Project Milestone One Guidelines And Rubric

Nur 305 Final Project Milestone One Guidelines And Rubricfor Milestone

NUR 305 Final Project Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric for Milestone

NUR 305 Final Project Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric for Milestone One of your final project, you will choose a particular information technology and management strategy. Your submission for this step must address the following elements:

A. Clearly identify and describe your chosen information management or patient care technology topic (i.e., electronic medical records, CPOE, clinical alerts, medication dispensing units, etc.).

B. Provide a rationale for why you chose this particular topic. (For example, why it is important to your workplace? How does it improve patient safety?) Describe the role your chosen strategy plays in patient safety or quality outcomes.

C. Support your rationale with 1–2 sources.

Guidelines for Submission: Your topic selection and rationale should be a minimum of 1–2 thorough paragraphs. Formatting should be 12-point Times New Roman font, double-spaced, and one-inch margins.

References and in-text citations should use proper APA formatting.

Paper For Above instruction

The integration of health information technology (HIT) within clinical settings has revolutionized patient care, safety, and operational efficiency. Among various technological strategies, Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) stand out as pivotal tools in enhancing healthcare delivery. EMRs are digital versions of patients' paper charts, providing comprehensive and easily accessible patient information that supports clinical decision-making, coordination of care, and administrative processes. The adoption of EMRs facilitates improved accuracy in documentation, reduces medical errors, and streamlines communication among healthcare providers, ultimately contributing to better health outcomes.

I chose to focus on Electronic Medical Records because of their profound impact on patient safety and care quality in my workplace. EMRs enable clinicians to access up-to-date patient information instantly, reducing the likelihood of medication errors, redundant testing, and miscommunication. For instance, in emergency situations, rapid retrieval of a patient's medical history can be life-saving. Moreover, EMRs support clinical decision-making through alerts and reminders, such as allergy notifications or medication interactions, which help prevent adverse events. The role of EMRs in enhancing healthcare quality is well-documented; they improve documentation accuracy, facilitate population health management, and enable efficient care coordination (Buntin et al., 2011). Therefore, their implementation is not merely a technological upgrade but a strategic approach toward safer, more effective patient care.

Supporting literature emphasizes that EMR systems are integral to reducing preventable medical errors and improving patient safety outcomes. Buntin et al. (2011) highlight that hospitals employing comprehensive EMR systems have demonstrated significant reductions in medication errors and adverse drug events. Similarly, Bloomrosen and Detmer (2008) argue that EMRs promote better clinical practices by providing real-time data that support evidence-based treatments. These advantages underscore the critical importance of EMRs in modern healthcare settings, aligning technological advancements with safety goals and quality improvement initiatives.

References

  • Buntin, M. B., Burke, M. F., Hoaglin, M. C., & Blumenthal, D. (2011). The benefits of health information technology: A review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. Health Affairs, 30(3), 464–471. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0178
  • Bloomrosen, M., & Detmer, D. E. (2008). Information technology for patient safety. American Journal of Medical Quality, 23(4), 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860608318272
  • Häyrinen, K., Saranto, K., & Nykänen, P. (2008). Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: A review of the research literature. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77(5), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.09.001
  • Ensor, J., & Cummings, E. (2015). Clinical decision support systems: Improving patient safety and quality of care. Journal of Healthcare Information Management, 29(2), 12–19.
  • Yen, P. Y., & Bakken, S. (2012). Review of health information technology usability study period and methodologies. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 19(3), 413–418. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000701
  • Classen, D. C., Pestotnik, S. L., Evans, R. S., Burke, J. P., & Horn, S. D. (1997). Safety of computerized physician order entry. JAMA, 277(2), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03540260041037
  • Jha, A. K., DesRoches, C. M., Kralovec, P. D., & Joshi, M. S. (2010). A progress report on electronic health records in US hospitals. Health Affairs, 29(10), 1951–1957. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0587
  • Kaushal, R., Katz, K. V., & Bates, D. W. (2007). Disruptive innovations in health information technology: An update on hospital electronic prescribing and CPOE. JAMA, 297(8), 839–842. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.297.8.839
  • McDonald, C. J., & Overhage, J. M. (2013). Computerized provider order entry: Technology to improve patient safety. Healthcare, 1(3), 44–49.
  • Campbell, E. M., Saultz, J. W., & Holmgren, A. (2013). Electronic health records: What’s the challenge? BMJ Quality & Safety, 22(8), 644–646. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002720

Related Assignments