NURS 440 Week 8 Rubric - Current Issue/Trend Presentation

NURS 440 Week 8 Rubric - Current Issue/Trend Presentation

Rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout. Meets or Exceeds Expectations Mostly Meets Expectations Below Expectations Does Not Meet Expectations Identification, definition, and description of your topic background 21.6 (9.00%) - 24 (10.00%) Provides full and complete identification, definition and description of the topic background 18.24 (7.60%) - 21.36 (8.90%) Provides partial identification, definition and description of the topic background 14.4 (6.00%) - 18 (7.50%) Provides brief and incomplete identification, definition, and description of the topic background 0 (0.00%) - 14.16 (5.90%) Does not provide brief/incomplete identification and description of the topic background Critical Analysis 88.56 (36.90%) - 98.4 (41.00%) Presents an exemplary articulation and insightful analysis of significant current issue and/or trend in nursing. Ideas are professionally sound and creative; they are supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are professionally sound and creative; they are supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. 74..16%) - 87..49%) Presents an accurate analysis of significant current issue and/or trend in nursing. Ideas are mostly supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Makes some attempt to draw conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are mostly supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Makes some attempt to draw conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. 59.04 (24.60%) - 73.8 (30.75%) Provides insufficient explanations of significant current issue and/or trend in nursing. Ideas are generally unsupported by scientific evidence, but some attempt has been made. Fails to draw conclusions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are generally unsupported by scientific evidence, but some attempt has been made. Fails to draw conclusions regarding chosen topic. 0 (0.00%) - 58..19%) Does not, or incorrectly, answer with insufficient explanations that show no understanding of current trend/issue. Information is not scientifically sound Content 54 (22.50%) - 60 (25.00%) Makes insightful, clear, and accurate connections to importance of lobbying legislators or local government for support funding. Offers detailed and specific examples regarding effect on current clinical practice settings. 45.6 (19.00%) - 53.4 (22.25%) Makes mostly accurate connections to importance of lobbying legislators or local government for support funding, but may lack an important detail. Response indicates a general understanding regarding effect on current clinical practice settings. 36 (15.00%) - 45 (18.75%) Provides several insufficient or inaccurate connections to importance of lobbying legislators or local government for support funding, although attempts are made to address one or two key concepts. Response indicates an introductory understanding regarding effect on current clinical practice settings. 0 (0.00%) - 35.4 (14.75%) Information is inaccurate or inadequate. Response indicates little or no understanding of current trend/issue and importance to lobby for any support funding. Creativity and Professionalism 8.64 (3.60%) - 9.6 (4.00%) Include all visual illustration (i.e., data, graphs & clip arts) appropriate to capture the audience in slides/presentation 7.296 (3.04%) - 8.544 (3.56%) Include most visual illustration (i.e., data, graphs & clip arts) to capture the audience in slides/presentation 5.76 (2.40%) - 7.2 (3.00%) Include few visual illustrations (i.e., data, graphs & clip arts) to capture the audience in slides/presentation 0 (0.00%) - 5.664 (2.36%) Include no visual illustrations (i.e., data, graphs & clip arts) to capture the audience in slides/presentation Application 21.6 (9.00%) - 24 (10.00%) Provides full applications from clinical/personal to practice 18.24 (7.60%) - 21.36 (8.90%) Provides partial applications from clinical/personal to practice 14.4 (6.00%) - 18 (7.50%) Provides brief or incomplete applications from clinical/personal to practice 0 (0.00%) - 14.16 (5.90%) Provides no applications from clinical/personal to practice References slide, APA style, grammar, spelling, and punctuation 21.6 (9.00%) - 24 (10.00%) Complete list of references/citations with no APA errors Include peer research-based articles 18.24 (7.60%) - 21.36 (8.90%) Mostly complete list of references or citations with 1-3 APA errors Include mostly peer research-based articles 14.4 (6.00%) - 18 (7.50%) Partial list of references or citations with 3-5 APA errors Include few peer research-based articles 0 (0.00%) - 14.16 (5.90%) No references listed or cited with multiple errors Include no peer research-based articles

Paper For Above instruction

In contemporary healthcare, nursing professionals are increasingly recognizing the importance of engaging in policy advocacy to influence healthcare policies and improve patient outcomes. One significant current trend in nursing is the emphasis on legislative lobbying to secure support and funding for healthcare initiatives. This paper explores the background of this trend, evaluates its significance, and discusses its implications for clinical practice.

The background of legislative lobbying in nursing involves understanding the evolution of healthcare policy advocacy. Historically, nurses have participated in advocacy efforts primarily at the community level, focusing on patient safety and quality of care. However, over recent decades, there has been a shift towards more active engagement in legislative processes. This transition is driven by the recognition that healthcare policies significantly impact clinical practice and patient outcomes. Nurses now advocate for policies related to funding, staffing, technology integration, and access to care, which directly influence their ability to deliver optimal care (Yapp et al., 2019).

The current trend underscores the importance of lobbying legislators and local governments to secure support and funding for healthcare programs. Effective lobbying can lead to tangible benefits, such as increased reimbursement rates, funding for nurse education, and infrastructural improvements. For example, recent initiatives advocating for increased funding for nursing education have demonstrated how active legislative engagement can address workforce shortages and improve patient care quality. The American Nurses Association (ANA) has actively promoted nurses' involvement in policy advocacy, emphasizing that political participation is a professional obligation (ANA, 2020).

The significance of this trend lies in its impact on clinical practice. When nurses engage in lobbying efforts, they can influence policies that directly improve working conditions, patient safety standards, and resource allocation. For example, legislation that provides funding for advanced practice nursing can expand access to primary care, especially in underserved areas (Kaiser et al., 2021). Moreover, nurses' advocacy can lead to increased utilization of evidence-based practices and updated clinical guidelines, ultimately improving patient outcomes and healthcare quality.

In addition to the immediate clinical benefits, lobbying efforts foster a culture of professional empowerment among nurses. By participating in policy discussions, nurses develop a deeper understanding of healthcare systems and gain confidence in their ability to effect change. This professional growth promotes a proactive approach to addressing healthcare disparities and promotes leadership within nursing circles (Schultz & Meleis, 2018).

However, challenges persist in implementing effective lobbying strategies. Barriers include limited time, political apathy, lack of policy knowledge, and insufficient training in advocacy skills. To overcome these obstacles, nursing education programs should incorporate health policy and advocacy training into curricula, preparing future nurses to engage effectively in legislative processes. Additionally, professional organizations like the ANA provide resources and platforms for nursing advocacy efforts, facilitating collective action and amplifying nurses’ voices (Lachman et al., 2020).

In conclusion, the trend of engaging in legislative lobbying to secure support and funding is a vital component of modern nursing practice. It facilitates the advancement of healthcare policies that improve clinical practices and patient outcomes. Building capacity for effective advocacy through education, professional organization support, and strategic initiatives is essential for nurses to continue influencing healthcare reform positively. As nursing continues to evolve as a profession, active participation in policy advocacy remains a cornerstone for ensuring that healthcare systems meet the needs of diverse populations.

References

• American Nurses Association (ANA). (2020). Advocating for nurses and patients: How nurses can influence policy. ANA Publications.
• Kaiser, S., Smith, J., & Lee, T. (2021). Enhancing access to primary care through nursing legislation. Journal of Nursing Policy & Practice, 36(2), 102-109.
• Lachman, V. D., Reed, S. D., & Reese, M. (2020). Building advocacy capacity in nursing: Strategies for success. Nursing Outlook, 68(4), 415-423.
• Schultz, A. B., & Meleis, A. I. (2018). Nurse empowerment and policy development: A pathway to health equity. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 50(2), 141-147.
• Yapp, C., Olson, E., & Bittner, N. (2019). The evolution of nursing advocacy: From grassroots to policy change. Nursing Leadership, 32(3), 45-53.