One Of The Products That The Company Makes Is Snack Foods

One Of the Products That Company W Makes Is Snack Foods

The research and development department of Company W has developed a new formula for one type of snack food that is cheaper to make than the current formula. They want to test the new formula with consumers to see if consumers can distinguish between the old and new formulas. To achieve accurate and reliable results, it is essential to collect data from an unbiased sample of consumers. This sample should be randomly selected based on relevant demographic and behavioral characteristics such as age, whether or not they have children, their geographical location, frequency of snack food purchases, and current consumption of the existing product.

Understanding Qualitative Attributes and Rating Scales

In conducting consumer tests, it is important to assess qualitative attributes of the snack food, which describe qualities rather than numerical measurements. An example of a qualitative attribute is the flavor profile, such as “salty” to “sweet.” Another attribute could be the texture, ranging from “crunchy” to “soft.” A third attribute could be the aroma, which can be assessed descriptively and might be nominal—categories like “spicy,” “fruity,” or “savory.” For the other two attributes, which are ordinal, a 5-point rating scale might be used. For instance, for flavor, the scale endpoints could be “Not flavorful at all” and “Extremely flavorful.” For texture, the endpoints could be “Very soft” and “Very crunchy.” These scales allow consumers to express degrees of preference or perception along a continuum, facilitating easier analysis of the data.

Difference Between Nominal and Ordinal Data & Their Relation to Rating Scales

Nominal data classify attributes into categories without any intrinsic order, such as flavors like “spicy,” “sweet,” or “salty.” Ordinal data, however, have a clear order but the intervals between categories are not necessarily equal, exemplified by a 5-point rating scale from “Not flavorful at all” to “Extremely flavorful.” When using a rating scale, we are assigning ordinal data because respondents rank their perceptions, but the distances between scale points are not precisely measurable. This distinction is crucial in data analysis because ordinal data can reveal relative preferences or perceptions, whereas nominal data can only identify the presence or absence of categories.

Quantitative Attributes and the Interval-Ratio Scale

The scientific team might also measure quantitative attributes of the snack food. Two examples are:

• Calories per serving, which is a ratio-level measurement because it has a true zero point and meaningful ratios (e.g., 200 calories is twice as much as 100 calories).
• Weight of a single snack piece, also ratio data, since zero weight indicates absence and measurements are proportional.

Understanding the difference between interval and ratio data is important. Interval data, like temperature in degrees Celsius or Fahrenheit, have meaningful differences but lack a true zero point, making ratios meaningless (e.g., 20°C is not “twice” as hot as 10°C). Ratio data, on the other hand, possess both meaningful differences and a true zero, allowing for comparisons of magnitude through ratios (Hinkelmann & Kempthorne, 2008). These measurements help scientists quantify snack food properties systematically.

Business Intelligence and Data Collection

Business intelligence involves analyzing data to support strategic decision-making. In this context, data collected from consumer taste tests can be analyzed to determine preferences, identify potential market segments, and evaluate the new formula’s acceptability. Effective use of business intelligence enables Company W to make data-driven decisions about product development, marketing strategies, and production costs, ultimately improving competitive advantage (Chen et al., 2012).

Population vs. Sample & Avoiding Bias

A population includes all individuals or objects of interest; in this case, the entire demographic group of consumers who buy snack foods. A sample is a subset of this population selected for the study. It is critical to avoid bias to ensure that findings are representative and generalizable to the broader population. Bias can occur if certain groups are overrepresented or underrepresented, which might lead to misleading conclusions.

Examples of possible populations for the test include:

1. All consumers aged 18-35 who purchase snack foods in a specific geographic region.
2. All regular snack food buyers across the country who have purchased the current product in the last month.

Conclusion

In summary, selecting a random, unbiased sample across relevant demographics is vital for accurate data collection. Utilizing qualitative attributes with nominal and ordinal data, alongside quantitative measures with interval and ratio data, provides comprehensive insights into consumer preferences and product properties. Understanding these data types and avoiding bias ensures that the business intelligence gathered will support confident, effective decision-making for Company W’s product development and marketing strategies.

References

• Chen, H., Chiang, R. H. L., & Storey, V. C. (2012). Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to insights. MIS Quarterly, 36(4), 1165-1188.
• Hinkelmann, K., & Kempthorne, O. (2008). Design and Analysis of Experiments, Volume 1: Introduction to Experimental Design. John Wiley & Sons.
• Malhotra, N. K., & Birks, D. F. (2007). Marketing Research: An Applied Approach. Pearson Education.
• Hair, J. F., Wolfinbarger, M., Money, A. H., Samouel, P., & Strandvik, T. (2011). Essentials of Business Research Methods. M.E. Sharpe.
• Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford Publications.
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. Sage Publications.
• Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2014). Business Research Methods. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Montgomery, D. C. (2017). Design and Analysis of Experiments. John Wiley & Sons.
• Malhotra, N. K. (2010). Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation. Pearson.
• Rogelberg, S. G. (2002). The Scientific Method: An Evolution of Inquiry. American Journal of Psychology, 115(3), 419-436.