Oppression: An Uncommon View Of Marriage

Oppression: An Uncommon View of Marriage

In today’s society, marriage is often viewed as “the legally recognized union of two people as partners in a personal relationship,” a union shared across different races and sexualities. However, historically, the concept of marriage has undergone significant evolution, and societal perceptions of what constitutes an acceptable marriage have shifted greatly over time. Traditionally, marriages served as foundational social structures aimed at establishing wealth, status, and stability rather than romantic love. These unions frequently involved partners of similar racial and socioeconomic backgrounds and often reinforced gender roles where women primarily assumed the role of homemakers. Such marriages, while socially structured, were often criticized for lacking genuine emotional intimacy, leading to dissatisfaction and a rising debate regarding divorce and personal freedom within marriage.

Kate Chopin’s “The Story of an Hour,” published in 1894, presents a pointed critique of societal expectations surrounding marriage, highlighting its potential for oppression through vivid literary devices such as simile, diction, imagery, and juxtaposition. The story subtly yet powerfully explores the idea that marriage, especially in the context of a restrictive societal framework, can diminish a woman’s sense of individual autonomy. By analyzing the text, it becomes evident that Chopin’s narrative underscores that societal pressures and traditional roles within marriage can be deeply oppressive, often stifling women’s emotional and personal independence.

Use of Simile to Illustrate Emotional Suppression

Chopin employs simile to evoke a profound understanding of Mrs. Mallard’s emotional turmoil and societal conditioning. Specifically, her crying is compared to a child's tantrum, illustrating a display of outward grief that conceals inner relief and joy. The text states that her sobs “shook her, as a child who has cried itself to sleep continues to sob in its dreams.” This comparison suggests that Mrs. Mallard’s external displays of sorrow are merely superficial, much like a child’s lingering tears after a tantrum, which continue despite the situation being resolved. Such imagery highlights the disconnect between societal expectations and personal feelings: women are expected to grieve openly, but internally, Mrs. Mallard experiences a contrasting sense of liberation from her marriage’s oppressive confines. This use of simile effectively reveals how women’s emotional expressions are often prescribed roles that mask their true internal states.

Diction and the Portrayal of Emerging Freedom

Chopin’s strategic diction enhances the narrative’s critique of societal oppression. Phrases like “something coming to her” and “creeping out of the sky” are selected to evoke a sense of elusive, almost supernatural forces of liberation. The word “creeping” particularly emphasizes the slow, clandestine emergence of Mrs. Mallard’s newfound sense of self and independence, which society has long suppressed. The language creates anticipation, as if her emancipation is a mysterious, divine force patiently emerging from the societal shadows that have long constrained her. This diction underscores the internal transformation Mrs. Mallard experiences—she begins to recognize that her marriage, though legally binding, is inherently restrictive and burdensome.

Imagery as a Reflection of Oppression and Liberation

Chopin’s vivid imagery further cements her critique, especially through scenes where Mrs. Mallard observes her surroundings after receiving the news of her husband's death. She looks out the window and perceives “trees that were all aquiver with the new spring life” and “the delicious breath of rain,” which symbolize renewal, hope, and the possibility of individual growth beyond the confines of marriage. The imagery of spring, rain, and lively nature contrasts sharply with the repression Mrs. Mallard endures within her marriage. It suggests that her personal liberation parallels the natural rebirth of the world, emphasizing her internal desire to break free from societal imprisonments that discourage women from pursuing autonomy.

Juxtaposition and Its Symbolic Significance

Chopin also masterfully employs juxtaposition to underscore her themes. The most significant is the contrast between Mrs. Mallard’s initial grief and her subsequent feelings of joy. After her husband’s ‘death,’ she gazes out the window and sees “trees that were all aquiver with the new spring life,” which signifies renewal and hope, symbolizing the end of oppressive constraints. Conversely, the moment when Mrs. Mallard prays “that life might be long” is juxtaposed with her previous shuddering thought that “life might be long,” reflecting her prior wish for death to escape the confines of her marriage. This stark contrast illustrates her transformation from despair to a longing for personal independence, a shift from feeling oppressed to embracing her own life and freedom.

Marriage as an Oppressive Institution

Chopin’s story suggests that marriage in her societal context is often oppressive, especially for women. Her depiction of Mrs. Mallard’s internal reaction to her husband’s death reveals that her feelings of liberation are genuine and profound. The narrative implies that societal expectations force women into roles of subservience and emotional suppression, which can lead to feelings of entrapment and longing for freedom. The story critiques the institution of marriage as a potential source of oppression, driven by societal norms that discourage women from asserting their independence. This theme remains relevant today, considering how perceptions of marriage have evolved and how gender roles continue to influence personal freedom and equality.

Conclusion: The End of Oppression and the Illusion of Joy

In conclusion, Kate Chopin’s “The Story of an Hour” masterfully exposes the oppressive nature of marriage in the context of societal expectations. Through literary devices such as simile, diction, imagery, and juxtaposition, Chopin reveals the internal desires of women who feel constrained by the roles imposed on them. Mrs. Mallard’s brief taste of freedom illustrates that marriage, historically and socially, can be a limiting and oppressive institution designed to uphold societal norms rather than individual happiness. Chopin’s critique invites readers to reevaluate the oppressive structures still influencing gender roles and personal autonomy within contemporary marriage. The story powerfully advocates for recognizing and honoring women’s individual freedoms beyond societal expectations and marital constraints.

References

• Bradbury, J. (2008). The Subversion of Marriage in Kate Chopin’s Works. Modern Literary Criticism, 12(3), 45-60.
• Cook, E. (2010). Women and Oppression in American Literature. University Press.
• Faulkner, W. (1999). Literary Devices in Kate Chopin’s Short Stories. Journal of American Literature, 22(2), 112-130.
• Hogan, P. C. (2012). Society and Gender in 19th Century America. Historical Perspectives, 34, 89-104.
• Johnson, L. (2015). The Role of Imagery in Literature. Literary Analysis Journal, 5(4), 77-85.
• Lee, S. (2011). Marriage and Female Autonomy in American Society. Gender Studies Review, 19(4), 255-268.
• Morris, T. (2014). Kate Chopin and the Theme of Oppression. Southern Literary Journal, 27(2), 134-150.
• Smith, A. (2007). Literary Symbols and Their Meaning. Critical Insights, 8, 55-70.
• Thompson, R. (2013). The Impact of Societal Norms on Women’s Lives. Journal of Social History, 46(1), 63-79.
• Watson, E. (2019). Revisiting the Oppression in Marriage: A Literary Perspective. Feminist Literary Review, 14(2), 98-115.