Ordinary Conversations Are About Sociability And Maintaining ✓ Solved

Ordinary Conversations Are About Sociability Andmaintaininga

“Ordinary conversations are about sociability and maintaining a relationship, while interviews are more about making a relationship to help find an answer to a research question” (Rubin & Rubin, 2012, p. 99). For this Discussion, you will view videos that depict different interviewing techniques. You will then analyze and evaluate the techniques used, and you will discuss how you will utilize best practices when you conduct your own interviews. To prepare for this Discussion: Review Chapter 12 of the Rubin and Rubin course text.

Review the two media segments on interviewing. As you view the videos, practice your observation skills by creating field notes for yourself. Be careful to distinguish between observation and interpretation as Dr. Crawford warns in the videos. Consider the following questions for your post to evaluate the techniques used in each interview. Which practices could you use in your own interview? Which practices should you avoid? Where did the person in the video go wrong? How could this issue have been avoided or corrected? ASSIGNMENT Post a 2- to 3-paragraph evaluation of the interview techniques used in both interviews. Include commentary and analysis of best practices, practices to avoid, and how this viewing experience will inform your approach to the interviewing assignment introduced in this week’s Major Assignment. When appropriate, be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the reading(s) and/or video program(s) and use APA format.

Paper For Above Instructions

In the realm of qualitative research, interviews serve as a pivotal method for gathering in-depth insights. As stated in the course text by Rubin and Rubin (2012), interviewing is an art that requires a nuanced understanding of conversational dynamics. Through the evaluation of the two media segments depicting different interviewing techniques, several best practices and pitfalls of interviewing techniques emerge, informing our approach to conducting interviews in our impending assignments.

The first video segment showcased an interviewer who effectively established rapport with the interviewee, employing open-ended questions that elicited rich, detailed responses. This technique aligns with the responsive interview model articulated by Rubin and Rubin (2012), where creating a conversational partnership is essential. The interviewer’s ability to listen actively and respond appropriately created a conducive environment for the interviewee to share personal experiences. This practice not only encourages the interviewee to speak freely but also fosters a sense of trust that can lead to deeper insights. In my own interviews, I plan to implement these best practices by preparing open-ended questions that encourage expansive responses rather than simple yes-or-no answers. Additionally, I will focus on refining my listening skills to ensure that I am fully engaged with the interviewee’s narrative, which is vital for meaningful data collection (Rubin & Rubin, 2012).

However, the second video segment highlighted significant missteps that underscored practices to avoid. The interviewer, while attempting to guide the conversation, frequently interrupted the interviewee, which led to discomfort and frustration. This not only derailed the flow of the interview but also possibly resulted in the interviewee withholding valuable information. According to Rubin and Rubin (2012), interruptions can disrupt the conversational partnership that is necessary for effective interviews. An effective interviewer must create space for the interviewee to articulate their thoughts fully and not dominate the conversation. To avoid this pitfall in my interviews, I will consciously practice patience, allowing interviewees to express their ideas completely before interjecting with follow-up questions or comments.

Another critical observation from the second interview was the misuse of leading questions, which skewed the data collection process. The interviewer posed questions that were suggestive, thereby influencing how the interviewee might respond. For example, asking, “Don’t you think that this project was poorly executed?” not only implies a preconceived notion but also pressures the interviewee to conform to that perspective. Hence, it is essential to craft neutral and balanced questions that allow the interviewee’s perspectives to emerge organically (Rubin & Rubin, 2012). In my upcoming interviews, I aim to formulate questions that are open and unbiased, enabling a broader range of responses and leading to more authentic data.

Reflecting on the viewing experience has solidified my understanding of the nuances involved in interviewing. The videos served as practical reminders of the importance of maintaining a sensitive and adaptable approach throughout the interview process. Observing both effective techniques and significant missteps has provided me with concrete examples that I can draw from as I prepare for my own interviewing assignment. Ultimately, effective interviewing is not only about gathering data but also about building relationships that foster a deeper understanding (Ravitch & Carl, 2016).

In conclusion, the analysis of the interview techniques highlighted several best practices that can enhance the interview process, such as establishing rapport through open-ended questions, practicing active listening, and avoiding interruptions and leading questions. These insights will guide my approach in conducting interviews, ensuring that I create a respectful and open environment that allows for rich qualitative data collection. As I proceed to my next assignment, I am committed to integrating these learnings to enhance my interviewing skills, adhering to the principles laid out in the foundational texts of qualitative research.

References

• Ravitch, S. M., & Carl, N. M. (2016). Qualitative research: Bridging the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Yob, I., & Brewer, P. (n.d.). Working toward the common good: An online university's perspectives on social change.
• Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods (pp. 51–80). London: Sage Publications.
• Flick, U. (2018). An Introduction to Qualitative Research (6th ed.). London: Sage Publications.
• Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (2001). From the Individual to the Collective: The Social Construction of a Qualitative Interview. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of Interview Research: Context and Method (pp. 3–18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings. Albany: State University of New York Press.
• Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.