Organizational Behavior, Ch. 15 Outsourcing Vs. Offshoring ✓ Solved

Organizational Behavior, Ch. 15 Outsourcing v. Offshoring

Discuss the implications of outsourcing versus offshoring in the context of organizational behavior, considering employee experiences and management perspectives.

Paper For Above Instructions

Outsourcing and offshoring have become fundamental components of strategic management in many organizations today. While both terms are often used interchangeably, they are not synonymous. Outsourcing refers to the practice of obtaining goods and services from external suppliers instead of relying on the internal workforce, whereas offshoring specifically pertains to relocating business processes to another country. This distinction is vital, as both practices have significant implications for organizational behavior, employee experience, and managerial strategies.

The Distinction Between Outsourcing and Offshoring

Outsourcing can occur either domestically or internationally. For instance, a company might outsource its customer service operations to a firm in the same country or to a company in another country. The primary objective behind outsourcing is often to reduce costs, improve efficiency, and leverage specialized skills that may not be available within the company. Offshoring, on the other hand, typically involves moving operations to a foreign country where labor is cheaper, thus aiming to take advantage of lower operational costs.

Organizations often adopt these strategies based on economic factors, including labor costs, access to skilled labor, and taxation considerations. However, the decision to outsource or offshore can significantly impact employee morale, organizational culture, and overall public perception.

Employee Experience and Morale

As indicated by various discussions on the topic, one of the central issues related to outsourcing and offshoring is job loss. Employees are aware that these strategies may lead to their positions being eliminated or moved abroad. This realization can create a sense of insecurity, negatively affecting workplace morale and productivity. For instance, when call centers are outsourced to countries like India, employees in the originating company may feel undervalued or threatened, even if the company positions outsourcing as a way to better serve customers.

A notable trend is that employees generally express a stronger aversion to offshoring compared to outsourcing. While outsourcing can be seen as a standard business practice that allows companies to maintain quality by engaging specialized vendors, offshoring is often perceived as taking jobs away from local workers in favor of cheaper labor abroad. This perception can lead to a public relations issue for companies, causing backlash from customers and advocacy groups concerned about domestic employment.

Management Perspectives

From a managerial standpoint, the decision to outsource or offshore operations necessitates careful consideration of the potential organizational culture shifts. Managers must recognize that employees are not just cogs in a machine; they are integral to the mission and success of an organization. As the discussions suggest, when employees are treated poorly or without consideration for their contributions, it undermines morale and increases turnover, as evidenced by the high turnover rates mentioned in the context of the Pentagon.

Moreover, effective communication and change management practices become crucial. Leaders should constructively communicate the rationale behind outsourcing or offshoring decisions, emphasizing transparency and the potential benefits for the organization and its employees. Implementing frameworks such as Kotter's Eight-Step Process for Leading Change can provide a solid strategy for managing transitions while minimizing employee resistance. This process includes creating urgency, building coalitions, and communicating the vision, which fosters a culture of inclusion and reduces fear of job displacement.

Quality and Focus on Operations

Another aspect to consider is the quality and operational implications of outsourcing and offshoring. Effective management of outsourced functions often entails establishing clear performance metrics and fostering strong relationships with service providers to maintain quality. In contrast, offshoring presents unique challenges, particularly in maintaining operational standards across different cultural and regulatory terrains.

Companies like Walmart, which adopt a mixed approach of domestic production and offshore sourcing, illustrate the complexities of balancing cost considerations with quality control. They emphasize the importance of the “Made in America” campaign to appeal to consumer sentiments, thereby showing that quality and ethos can also be selling points regardless of the cost-saving strategies implemented.

Conclusion

Ultimately, the choice between outsourcing and offshoring is heavily influenced by economic realities, but organizations must tread carefully due to the highly charged nature of employee perspectives. Understanding the differences between these practices allows for targeted management strategies that can better align with organizational behavior principles. Leaders are tasked with the dual responsibility of ensuring organizational efficiency while safeguarding their workforce's morale and engagement. A delicate balance must be struck to harness the benefits of both outsourcing and offshoring while addressing the human side of these business strategies.

References

• Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational Behavior, 15th Edition. Prentice Hall.
• Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading Change. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Harrison, J. S., & John, C. H. (2013). Foundations in Strategic Management. Cengage Learning.
• Friedman, T. L. (2005). The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
• Gereffi, G. (2014). Global Value Chains in a Postcrisis World: Resilience, Reintegration, and Reregulation. Cambridge University Press.
• Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
• Levitt, T. (1983). The Globalization of Markets. Harvard Business Review.
• Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (2003). Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation. Simon & Schuster.
• Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press.
• Zhou, L., & Li, B. (2012). Outsourcing: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Routledge.