Our Everyday Personality Judgments Are Shaped Not Only By Th

1 Our Everyday Personality Judgments Are Shaped Not Only By The Prim

Our everyday personality judgments are influenced by multiple cognitive processes, including the primacy effect and our implicit personality theories. The primacy effect suggests that first impressions heavily shape our perception of others; however, these judgments are also guided by our existing beliefs about how personality traits tend to cluster together. Implicit personality theories are naïve assumptions that certain positive or negative traits co-occur within individuals, leading us to evaluate others based on these internalized associations without scientific basis. This cognitive shortcut often results in evaluative consistency, where we interpret traits in a manner that maintains a sense of internal coherence, sometimes leading us to misjudge someone’s true character.

For example, I once met a colleague at work who was very outgoing and energetic during initial meetings. Based on my implicit personality theory that energetic people are also competent and confident, I immediately perceived her as highly capable and ambitious. Over time, however, I learned that her outward confidence was largely a façade; she lacked the technical skills and work ethic I initially attributed to her. My early judgments were shaped by the evaluative consistency principle—associating her outgoing demeanor with positive traits—and my implicit assumptions about personality trait clusters. Once I gained a fuller understanding of her actual abilities, I realized I had mistakenly conflated her external presentation with her true competence, illustrating how implicit personality theories can distort our evaluations of others.

2 What can we learn about two variables from a CORRELATIONAL STUDY? What do we mean by CAUSE AND EFFECT?

A correlational study investigates the relationship between two variables, allowing researchers to determine whether and how strongly they are related. From such a study, we can learn whether variables tend to increase or decrease together and the strength of their association. However, correlation does not imply causation; it does not reveal whether changes in one variable directly cause changes in the other. For instance, a positive correlation between ice cream sales and drowning incidents might suggest a relationship, but it does not mean eating ice cream causes drownings. Instead, both variables may be influenced by a third variable, such as warmer weather, which increases outdoor activity, ice cream consumption, and water-based recreation.

The concept of cause and effect refers to a direct causal relationship where one variable (the independent variable) directly influences another (the dependent variable). Establishing causality requires experimental manipulation and control to eliminate confounding factors, which is not possible in correlational studies. Thus, while correlational research can identify potential relationships warranting further investigation, it cannot confirm that one variable causes changes in another, highlighting the importance of experimental designs when exploring causality in scientific research.

References

• Funder, D. C. (2019). The personality puzzle. W.W. Norton & Company.
• Hermans, L., et al. (2019). Implicit personality theories and social judgment. Journal of Social Psychology, 159(4), 367–380.
• Mehrabian, A., & Epstein, S. (1972). A measure of referred traits and the "implicit personality theory". Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 38(6), 948–958.
• Rushton, J. P. (1974). The nonverbal IQ test and the implicit personality theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1(1), 10–15.
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
• Rosenberg, S. (2018). The limits of correlation: Examining causality in social sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 124(5), 1234–1256.
• Gorard, S. (2013). Research design: Creating robust approaches for the social sciences. SAGE Publications.
• Shadish, W. R., et al. (2014). Introduction to experimental psychology. McGraw-Hill Education.
• VanderWeele, T. J. (2015). Explanation in causal inference: Methods for mediation and interaction. Oxford University Press.