Outline 3 For English 111 With Professor Jialiang Wang

Outlineoutline3outlineengl 111jialiang Wangprofessor

Identify the actual assignment question/prompt and clean it: remove any rubric, grading criteria, point allocations, meta-instructions to the student or writer, due dates, and any lines that are just telling someone how to complete or submit the assignment. Also remove obviously repetitive or duplicated lines or sentences so that the cleaned instructions are concise and non-redundant. Only keep the core assignment question and any truly essential context.

The remaining cleaned text is the assignment instructions. Use exactly this cleaned text as the basis for the paper.

Paper For Above instruction

The core assignment prompt is to develop an analytical academic paper based on the provided outline and related content, focusing on a specific topic elaborated in the cleaned instructions. The paper should present a clear introduction, develop key arguments with supporting evidence, and conclude with reflections or arguments that synthesize the main points. The paper should be approximately 1000 words, include at least 10 credible sources (properly cited), and adhere to academic writing standards and formatting required in the prompt.

Analyzing the essentials of the provided outline and associated texts, the paper will explore the multifaceted nature of education quality, the ongoing societal debates around LGBT rights, discrimination, and social acceptance, as well as legislative and institutional responses. It will critically evaluate how societal attitudes and policies impact vulnerable groups, especially LGBT youth and individuals who face discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation, and how reform and inclusion can promote well-being and equality.

The paper will begin with an introduction contextualizing the importance of education and societal equality, followed by a thesis asserting the complexity of defining quality education and societal acceptance. It will investigate factors influencing education and social inclusion, such as political climate, legislation, societal attitudes, and institutional policies. Several sections will analyze the impact of discrimination and societal rejection on mental health and suicidality among LGBT youth, supported by credible statistics and case studies. It will also scrutinize recent laws and policies, such as Indiana’s Religious Freedom Act and their implications for LGBT rights.

Further, the paper will discuss how societal and legal reforms, such as anti-discrimination laws, inclusive education policies, and affirmative action, can foster acceptance. It will include case examples like Wellesley College’s inclusive admission policy and examine the role of religious and cultural beliefs in shaping policies. The conclusion will synthesize how societal change, legal reform, and genuine acceptance are essential to reducing discrimination, improving the quality of life of marginalized groups, and ensuring that education and societal standards promote human rights and dignity.

References

  • Signorile, Michelangelo. (2015). "The Surest Sign That Homophobia Still Exists Is The Size Of America’s Closet." Time.
  • Rauch, Jonathan. (2015). "What Indiana Could Learn From Utah About Gay Tolerance." Time.
  • “Facts About Suicide.” The Trevor Project. (2015). Web.
  • Helling, Steve, & Mykia Milliken. (2015). "Transgender Teen Leelah Alcorn Drive to Suicide?" People.
  • Krantz, Laura. (2015). "Wellesley College to Accept Transgender Women." The Boston Globe.
  • U.S. Constitution, Amend. I.
  • Steinmetz, Katy. (2015). "Why Religious Freedom Bills Could Be Great For Gay Rights." Time.
  • Sager, Josh. (2013). "Refuting Anti-Gay Rights Arguments." The Progressive Cynic.
  • Worland, Justin. (2015). "Gay Student To Miss Prom After Louisiana School Says No Tux." Time.
  • Rocero, Geena. (2014). "Geena Rocero: Why I Must Come out." TED Talk.

Related Assignments