Outline Template: Thesis Statement Consult The Document

Outline Templatethesis Statement Consult The Document Titled Thesis

Outline Template Thesis Statement: [Consult the document titled “Thesis Statement Checklist.”] 1. Introduction. a. Thesis Statement b. Explanation of why the thesis statement is interesting and important. Why would it matter whether or not your thesis statement is true? c. Pieces of supporting evidence for your thesis statement. i. Supporting claim (1) ii. Supporting claim (2) iii. Supporting claim (3) iv. [You might have additional bits of supporting evidence as well. These should all be stated in similar fashion.] d. What is the most compelling reason why someone might disagree with your thesis? [Anticipate the strongest objection to your view.] e. What is the most important refutation of that objection? 2. Supporting claim (1) [This functions here as its own thesis statement for this section of the paper.] a. Supporting evidence (a) i. You might include here: textual support, citation of secondary literature, examples from current events or popular culture, etc. In each case, you need to provide a supporting argument that explains why the evidence (a) that you put forward really is evidence for claim (1). b. Supporting evidence (b) i. Repeat the same process that you did for 2a. c. Supporting evidence (c) d. Supporting evidence (d-? and so on) 3. Supporting claim (2) a. Supporting evidence (a) b. Supporting evidence (b) c. Supporting evidence (c) d. Supporting evidence (d-? and so on) 4. Supporting claim (3) a. Supporting evidence (a) b. Supporting evidence (b) c. Supporting evidence (c) d. Supporting evidence (d-? and so on) 5. Perhaps you have a claim (4), perhaps you don’t. You will adjust your outline length accordingly. 6. Compelling objection (1) [Anticipate the strongest objections(s) that someone might raise to your Thesis Statement. State that objection as charitably as possible.] a. Supporting evidence (a) [Here, you will provide the best evidence for the objection and explain why it does indeed support the objection and potentially disprove your thesis statement.] b. Supporting evidence (b) c. Supporting evidence (c) d. Supporting evidence (d-? and so on) 7. Compelling objection (2) [If there is another important objection to be considered, raise it here and repeat the process in section 6.] 8. Refutation of Compelling Objection (1) [Here, you will argue that CO1 is false.] a. Supporting evidence (a) b. Supporting evidence (b) c. Supporting evidence (c) d. Supporting evidence (d-? and so on) 9. Conclusion a. [Summarize the main points of each section in the paper.] b. [Explain why it is that no one can accept the various arguments you have made, and yet doubt the truth of your thesis.] c. [Explain what you have contributed to the philosophical understanding of your chosen topic. Why does it matter that [your thesis statement here]?]

Paper For Above instruction

The process of constructing a compelling thesis statement and outlining a well-organized argumentative paper begins with establishing a clear and engaging introduction that states the thesis. The thesis must not only articulate the primary claim but also explain why it is interesting and significant, emphasizing the potential impact or importance of the claim in its scholarly or practical context.

Support for the thesis must be laid out systematically through distinct supporting claims, each functioning as sub-arguments that collectively reinforce the central thesis. For each supporting claim, evidence should be drawn from textual analysis, secondary sources, current events, or cultural examples, accompanied by clear reasoning that links the evidence directly to the claim. This structure ensures that each part of the argument is substantiated and contributes to the overall coherence of the paper.

Anticipating objections is a crucial component of a robust argumentative structure. The most significant potential counterarguments should be identified and presented in their strongest form. For each objection, the paper must include a refutation supported by counter-evidence and reasoning, demonstrating the resilience of the original thesis against critiques.

The conclusion should synthesize the main points of each section, reaffirming the strength of the thesis in light of the evidence and arguments presented. It should also articulate why the thesis remains convincing despite possible objections, emphasizing its contribution to philosophical or scholarly understanding. Ultimately, the conclusion underscores the importance of the thesis and the value of the insights gained through the analysis.

This systematic approach, combining clear claims, supportive evidence, acknowledgment of objections, and refutations, creates a persuasive and academically rigorous paper that effectively advances understanding of the chosen topic.

References

  • Author, A. (Year). Title of the book or article. Journal or Publisher, Volume(Issue), pages.
  • Author, B. (Year). Title of the secondary source. Journal or Publisher, Volume(Issue), pages.
  • Author, C. (Year). Current event or cultural example. News Outlet or Website. URL.
  • Author, D. (Year). Theoretical framework or philosophical work. Publisher or Journal.
  • Author, E. (Year). Additional scholarly source. Journal or Publisher.
  • Author, F. (Year). Relevant internet media source. URL.
  • Author, G. (Year). Primary source or original text analyzed. Publisher or Journal.
  • Author, H. (Year). Comparative analysis or review article. Journal or Book Title.
  • Author, I. (Year). Recent empirical study related to topic. Journal.
  • Author, J. (Year). Concluding or summarizing reference that supports the thesis. Publisher or Journal.

Related Assignments