Overview For This Assignment: You Write Your Own Qualitative

Overview for This Assignment You Write Your Own Qualitative Study Crit

Read your selected journal article entirely. Analyze the journal article and use the specific questions that are outlined in Gray, Grove, and Sutherland (2017) found on pages 445 through 449 to construct your analysis of your chosen qualitative research study. These are the main headers of your paper: Identifying the Steps of the Qualitative Research Process Determination of Strengths and Weaknesses of Qualitative Studies Evaluating a Qualitative Study.

You have many questions to address in your assignment this week. They should be in complete sentences (i.e., bullet point responses are not acceptable). APA format is required in your assignment Word document.

Page length, excluding the title and references list, is between five and seven pages. Please refer to the Grading Rubric for details on how this activity will be graded.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Qualitative research plays a crucial role in nursing and health sciences by providing deep insights into human experiences, perceptions, and social contexts. One noteworthy study that exemplifies qualitative methodology is "Visibility and transmission: complexities around promoting hand hygiene in young children" by Biezen et al. (2019). This study explores the nuanced behaviors and environmental factors influencing hand hygiene practices among children, offering valuable implications for public health interventions. This critique aims to systematically analyze the study following the guidance from Gray, Grove, and Sutherland (2017), focusing on the steps of the qualitative research process, strengths and weaknesses, and a comprehensive evaluation of its scholarly contributions.

Identifying the Steps of the Qualitative Research Process

The qualitative research process generally encompasses several interconnected steps: identifying the phenomenon of interest, selecting appropriate methodology, data collection, data analysis, and interpretation. Biezen et al. (2019) began their study by clearly defining the phenomenon — the complexities surrounding hand hygiene promotion among young children. They employed a phenomenological approach rooted in interpretive frameworks to explore the subjective experiences of children, parents, and educators. The selection of participants was purposeful, aiming to gather diverse perspectives from different stakeholder groups.

Data collection involved semi-structured interviews and observations within naturalistic settings, aligning with qualitative standards emphasizing ecological validity. The researchers meticulously recorded the interactions and perceptions, ensuring data richness and depth. Subsequently, thematic analysis was conducted through inductive coding, allowing themes to emerge organically from the data, consistent with qualitative analytical procedures (Gray et al., 2017). Throughout the process, conscious efforts were made to maintain reflexivity and credibility, including member checks and triangulation, which enhanced the trustworthiness of the findings.

Determination of Strengths and Weaknesses of Qualitative Studies

Among the strengths of Biezen et al.'s (2019) study is its in-depth exploration of a socially relevant issue, providing rich contextual insights that quantitative methods might overlook. The purposeful sampling and rigorous analytical procedures support the credibility and transferability of the findings. The study’s use of multiple data sources and member validation further bolster its trustworthiness and authenticity.

However, certain weaknesses are apparent. The sample size, although appropriate for qualitative research, limits the generalizability of the findings. The potential for researcher bias exists, despite efforts for reflexivity, particularly given the interpretive nature of phenomenological analysis. Additionally, the study may have benefited from a more detailed account of the data analysis process to enhance transparency and reproducibility, which are important considerations in qualitative critique.

Evaluating a Qualitative Study

Evaluation of Biezen et al. (2019) reveals that the study adheres to fundamental qualitative principles such as depth, context, and participant voice. It demonstrates alignment with the interpretive paradigm, capturing the intricacies of behavior and perceptions within social contexts. The researchers effectively describe their methods, justify their approach, and discuss potential limitations transparently, reflecting good rigor.

The study’s findings contribute valuable knowledge for public health initiatives aimed at improving hygiene practices in early childhood environments. From an ethical standpoint, the study demonstrates sensitivity to participants, ensuring confidentiality and voluntary participation, which aligns with ethical standards in research.

Conclusion

In summary, Biezen et al. (2019) exemplifies a well-conducted qualitative study contributing meaningful insights into health promotion among children. Its meticulous approach to data collection and analysis aligns with qualitative research standards, despite some limitations regarding generalizability and transparency in data analysis. This critique underscores the importance of systematic qualitative processes and emphasizes critical evaluation to uphold research integrity and utility.

References

• Biezen, R., Grando, D., Mazza, D., & Brijnath, B. (2019). Visibility and transmission: complexities around promoting hand hygiene in young children: A qualitative study. BMC Public Health, 19(1), 1-9.
• Gray, J. R., Grove, S. K., & Sutherland, S. (2017). The Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence (8th ed.). Elsevier.
• Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice (10th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2015). Practical Research: Planning and Design (11th ed.). Pearson.
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Marco, C., & Scully, S. (2020). Ethical considerations in qualitative research. Journal of Nursing Ethics, 27(2), 393-404.
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications.
• Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Sage Publications.