Overview Of Factors Such As Income, Transportation, And Cult
Overviewfactors Such As Income Transportation Cultural Norms And Pre
Factors such as income, transportation, cultural norms and preferences, language barriers, education, family dynamics, etc., all interplay with every health encounter and will help determine what is desirable and possible for a patient. So often in practice, we come across patients not adhering to the treatment plan. Whether it’s the patient not following-up, showing up, taking medications as prescribed, completing labs, or not being disciplined enough to practice healthy habits, it’s far too easy to blame the patient and label him/her as “non-compliant.” However, is the patient really non-compliant? Is it fair and appropriate (or even ethical) for clinicians to make this judgment? There’s almost always a logical and more compassionate reason to explain the patient’s circumstance, and it’s often attributed to social determinants of health (SDOH) and inequities.
Your role as the provider is to listen to your patient and help determine what is desirable and what is possible. If a patient is not interested in changing (no matter how much you perceive that they need to change), they will not change. This is true no matter how “urgent” the behavior change may be. If we make recommendations that don’t match our patient’s desires or are impractical for them to achieve, we are actually harming them by wasting their time and resources, diminishing the therapeutic relationship by not listening to them, and providing culturally unsafe care. Therefore, as providers, we need to train ourselves to become cognizant of how the social determinants of health impact our patients’ lives to make meaningful recommendations and provide the best care.
It is also important to remember that we provide care with our unique “lens” on, just as our patient comes to us with their unique “lens.” We will have “blind spots” when we consider how the social determinants of health impact our patients because our “lenses” are different since our life experiences are almost certainly different from theirs. Therefore, we will not even consider some primary things for our patients. Ultimately, the point is that there are so many factors to consider, and we will be blind to key components of our patient's lives and experiences because they are not visible to us and because our “lens” only shows us what we know. Unless we make the effort to move beyond the limits of our lens, by being open-minded, respectful, and inquisitive.
Paper For Above instruction
The social determinants of health (SDOH)—including factors such as income, transportation, cultural norms, language barriers, education, and family dynamics—play a pivotal role in shaping patient health behaviors and outcomes. Recognizing the influence of these determinants is essential for healthcare providers to deliver equitable, respectful, and effective care. Misattributing non-adherence solely to patient fault neglects the broader social context affecting health management. Therefore, understanding and integrating SDOH into clinical practice fosters patient-centered care, enhances therapeutic relationships, and aligns treatment plans with patients’ realities and preferences.
Patients’ adherence to treatment regimens is frequently misinterpreted as non-compliance. However, non-adherence often stems from social, economic, and cultural barriers rather than individual negligence. For example, a patient may fail to follow medication schedules due to transportation issues hindering access to pharmacies, or cultural beliefs might conflict with prescribed health behaviors. Recognizing these barriers encourages clinicians to adopt a compassionate and pragmatic approach, emphasizing collaboration rather than judgment. This perspective aligns with the principles of social justice in healthcare, emphasizing the need to address structural inequities impacting health behaviors.
Clinicians’ own biases and limited perspectives—what can be termed their “lens”—may obscure understanding of a patient’s circumstances. A healthcare provider’s background, cultural experiences, and personal biases shape their perceptions and decision-making process. Consequently, this “lens” can create blind spots, leading to oversight of critical social determinants affecting the patient. For instance, providers unfamiliar with cultural practices may not appreciate traditional health beliefs influencing treatment decisions. To overcome this, practitioners must develop cultural humility—an ongoing process of self-reflection and learning—to broaden their understanding of diverse patient experiences.
Building cultural humility entails actively listening to patients, asking open-ended questions, and demonstrating genuine respect for their beliefs and circumstances. Such an approach fosters trust and encourages shared decision-making, increasing the likelihood of adherence and positive health outcomes. It also involves recognizing the limits of one’s own knowledge and seeking to learn from the patient’s lived experience. This reciprocal process enhances clinician awareness of social determinants beyond one’s immediate perception.
In addition to clinician self-awareness, systemic changes are necessary to mitigate the impact of social inequities. Healthcare systems should incorporate screening for social determinants, provide culturally competent resources, and advocate for policies addressing socioeconomic disparities. These measures can reduce barriers such as food insecurity, housing instability, and language obstacles, creating a more equitable healthcare environment.
In conclusion, integrating an understanding of social determinants of health into clinical practice fosters more compassionate, individualized care. Recognizing that non-adherence may be rooted in social and structural factors shifts the focus from blaming the patient to addressing broader inequities. Healthcare providers must be actively self-reflective about their own biases and develop cultural humility to deliver culturally safe and effective care. Ultimately, such efforts contribute to health equity and improved outcomes for diverse patient populations.
References
- Braveman, P., & Gottlieb, L. (2014). The social determinants of health: It's time to consider the causes of the causes. Public Health Reports, 129(Suppl 2), 19–31.
- Berkman, L. F., & Kawachi, I. (2000). Social Epidemiology. Oxford University Press.
- Andrews, J. O., Feliciano, L., & Nelson, L. (2013). Toward a critical consciousness of health disparities and social determinants of health among health sciences students. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 4, 133–137.
- Forman, J. A., et al. (2019). Culturally competent healthcare and social determinants of health: A systematic review. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 6(2), 209–219.
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2019). Communities in Action: Pathways to Health Equity. The National Academies Press.
- Petersen, L. R., et al. (2018). The role of cultural humility in clinical practice. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 33(9), 1380–1382.
- Hughes, L., & Cohen, C. (2017). Addressing social determinants of health: The ethical imperative for primary care. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 32(9), 1014–1016.
- World Health Organization. (2008). Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. World Health Organization.
- Shah, D., et al. (2017). Health disparities and social determinants of health: The role of health literacy. Health Affairs, 36(2), 213–220.
- Smedley, B. D., et al. (2003). Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. The National Academies Press.