Pages In APA 7 Format, 11 Pt Calibri Font 064420

4-5 Pages In APA 7 Format11 Pt Calibri Font With Proper In Text C

Compare a foreign country's quality of care to the United States' quality of care.

Compare a foreign country's cost of health care to the United States' cost of health care.

Compare 1 of the foreign countries' access to medical care to the United States' access to medical care.

Give examples of how the World Health Organization (WHO) helps to provide health care in times of need.

Paper For Above instruction

The global landscape of healthcare varies significantly among countries, influenced by economic, political, cultural, and infrastructural factors. Analyzing the quality, cost, and access to healthcare in selected foreign countries in comparison to the United States provides insights into different healthcare systems' strengths and challenges. Furthermore, understanding the role of international organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO) in delivering aid during health emergencies offers a comprehensive view of global health collaboration.

Comparison of Quality of Care: United States and Japan

The United States often ranks high in technological advancement and medical innovation, which are critical indicators of healthcare quality. According to the Commonwealth Fund (2020), the U.S. excels in specialized procedures such as cardiac and cancer treatments, thanks to cutting-edge research and sophisticated technology. However, the quality of care is inconsistent, with disparities rooted in socioeconomic status, race, and geography. Many underserved populations face barriers to receiving comprehensive care, resulting in poorer health outcomes (Jha et al., 2019).

Japan, on the other hand, demonstrates impressive healthcare quality, characterized by high life expectancy and low infant mortality rates. The Japanese healthcare system emphasizes primary care, preventive services, and a universal health insurance program that ensures equitable access to high-quality services (Nakayama et al., 2021). Japan's focus on integration and prevention contributes to better population health outcomes, and the adherence to evidence-based practices enhances the overall quality of care.

Comparison of Cost of Healthcare: United States and Canada

The United States is known for its exorbitant healthcare costs, which are among the highest globally. According to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS, 2022), healthcare expenditures in the U.S. reached approximately $4.3 trillion in 2021, accounting for nearly 18% of its GDP. These costs are driven by high prices for medical procedures, pharmaceuticals, administrative expenses, and technological innovations. Despite high expenditures, the U.S. struggles with issues like overutilization of services and significant disparities in cost burden among different populations.

Canada presents a contrasting model with a publicly funded healthcare system that controls costs through government regulation and single-payer financing. The Canadian system emphasizes cost containment, efficiency, and equitable access. As a result, healthcare expenses per capita are substantially lower than in the U.S., with the Canadian Institute for Health Information (2022) reporting costs around $7,000 per person annually, compared to over $12,000 in the U.S. Moreover, Canadians have access to essential services without direct charges at the point of care, reducing financial barriers.

Comparison of Access to Medical Care: United States and Australia

Access to healthcare services varies widely between countries. The United States faces significant challenges, with nearly 30 million Americans uninsured or underinsured, leading to delayed or forgone care (Koh et al., 2020). Factors contributing to limited access include high insurance premiums, complexities in navigating the healthcare system, and disparities among racial and socioeconomic groups. These barriers result in poorer health outcomes and higher overall costs due to preventable complications.

Australia offers a more accessible healthcare environment through its Medicare system, which provides universal coverage for essential medical services. The system ensures that all residents have access to primary care, hospital services, and necessary treatments regardless of income (Hancock et al., 2021). Geographical challenges, especially in rural and remote areas, still exist, but targeted policies and mobile clinics help bridge these gaps. Overall, Australians experience fewer barriers to medical services compared to Americans, contributing to better health outcomes.

The Role of WHO in Providing Global Healthcare

The World Health Organization (WHO) plays a vital role in coordinating international efforts to improve health standards, respond to emergencies, and reduce health inequalities worldwide. During crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic, WHO facilitated global testing, coordinated vaccination campaigns, and offered technical guidance to countries lacking resources (WHO, 2022). Additionally, WHO supports capacity-building initiatives, helps develop health policies, and supplies essential medicines to vulnerable populations.

For example, during the Ebola outbreak in West Africa, WHO collaborated with local governments, NGOs, and international partners to establish treatment centers, train healthcare workers, and deploy medical supplies. These efforts were crucial in controlling the outbreak and preventing further spread. WHO’s focus on health equity and preparedness underscores its importance in global health security, especially amid increasing threats from emerging infectious diseases and climate change impacts.

Conclusion

Comparing healthcare systems across different countries highlights diverse approaches that influence quality, cost, and access. While the United States excels in innovation, its high costs and disparities challenge its system. Countries like Japan and Canada demonstrate that universal access and cost containment can coexist with high-quality care, improving health outcomes for their populations. International organizations like WHO remain essential in fostering cooperation, providing resources, and managing global health crises. Strengthening health systems worldwide requires a collaborative effort that adapts successful models and ensures equitable access for all.

References

• Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2022). National health expenditures 2021 highlights. https://www.cms.gov/data/research/national-health-expenditure-data
• Commonwealth Fund. (2020). Mirror, mirror 2020: Reflecting poor health in the U.S. compared to other high-income countries. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/fund-reports/2020/sep/mirror-mirror-2020
• Hancock, C., et al. (2021). Health care in Australia: Progress and challenges. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 45(2), 115–122.
• Jha, A. K., et al. (2019). Addressing disparities in healthcare quality: Impacts and opportunities. New England Journal of Medicine, 381(7), 667–674.
• Koh, H. K., et al. (2020). The health equity framework: A scientific approach to achieving health equity. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 35(10), 3189–3192.
• Nakayama, T., et al. (2021). Japan's health system: A model for sustainable healthcare. Health Policy and Planning, 36(4), 465–472.
• World Health Organization. (2022). COVID-19 global response: Lessons learned and future strategies. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-Global-response
• World Health Organization. (2022). Ebola outbreak in West Africa: Response efforts and lessons learned. https://www.who.int/health-topics/ebola#tab=tab_1