Part 11: Patient Volumes For A Radiology Clinic Are Observed

Part 11 Patient Volumes For A Radiology Clinic Are Observed To Hav

Part 11 Patient Volumes For A Radiology Clinic Are Observed To Hav

1. Patient volumes for a radiology clinic are observed to have the following time-series data: Monday = 25, Tuesday = 28, Wednesday = 32, Thursday = 26, and Friday = 30. Using a 5-day moving average, and ignoring weekend volumes, what is the projection for the following Monday? If you used a 3-day moving average, using Wednesday through Friday values, how would the forecast change?

2. Assume that a hospital has a single-phase, multiple-channel waiting line. There are 2 employees, 10 customers currently in line, and new patients arrive at the rate of approximately 40 patients per hour. Calculate the average wait time.

3. Ten observations of cycle time were made, and the average observed cycle time was 17 minutes. Using an allowance factor of 20%, calculate the standard time for this process.

4. Based on the following data, calculate the single-factor productivity ratio using hours of labor for a housekeeping department: Number of employees = 100, Average hourly rate = $5.50, Total hours worked in September = 15,570, Total square feet maintained = 190.

5. Using sensitivity analysis, if the productivity ratio was 13.1 the previous month, has productivity increased or decreased? By what percentage?

6. Assume that a new piece of equipment could allow 25% of the labor force in Question 1 to be eliminated. Using a 173-hour working month for each employee, a total equipment cost of $60,000 (which has a useful life of 3 years), and ignoring the effect of cash flow and time value of money, would this be a good use of capital?

7. If a hospital reported the following results, calculate the full-time equivalent employees per adjusted occupied bed: Assess techniques that organizational leaders and improvement project teams must implement to accomplish quality goals. Apply methods for redesigning healthcare processes to achieve more reliable performance. Instructions: In MS Excel, complete the exercises above.

Paper For Above instruction

The management of healthcare facilities involves crucial decision-making processes that rely heavily on accurate data analysis and forecasting techniques. This paper addresses several key areas, including patient volume forecasting, wait time calculations, productivity measurement, and capacity utilization. These elements are essential for optimizing operational efficiency and improving patient care quality in radiology clinics and hospitals.

Patient Volume Forecasting Using Moving Averages

Forecasting patient volumes is fundamental for resource planning and scheduling in healthcare settings. The calculation of future patient arrivals using moving averages helps management anticipate demand and allocate resources effectively. Given the observed daily volumes—Monday (25), Tuesday (28), Wednesday (32), Thursday (26), and Friday (30)—a five-day moving average provides a smoothed outlook of trend fluctuations.

To compute the five-day moving average, sum the last five days' volumes and divide by five: (25 + 28 + 32 + 26 + 30) / 5 = 141 / 5 = 28.2. This projection estimates that the patient volume for the following Monday would be approximately 28 patients. This forecast reflects the recent trend across the workweek, smoothing out daily variability.

In contrast, a three-day moving average focusing on Wednesday through Friday involves summing Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday: (32 + 26 + 30) / 3 = 88 / 3 ≈ 29.33. The forecast using the three-day moving average suggests a slightly higher patient volume of approximately 29 patients for the upcoming Monday. This indicates that shorter moving averages tend to be more sensitive to recent fluctuations, potentially providing more responsive forecasts but with increased variability.

Wait Time Calculation in a Multi-Channel Queue

In hospital settings, understanding patient wait times is essential for improving service delivery. For a single-phase, multi-channel queue with two servers, 10 patients currently in line, and an arrival rate of 40 patients per hour, we can calculate the average wait time using queuing theory principles. Assuming a Poisson arrival process and exponential service times, the system resembles an M/M/2 queue model.

The utilization rate (ρ) of each server is given by the arrival rate divided by total service capacity:

ρ = λ / (c * μ)

Where λ = 40 patients/hour, c = 2 servers, and μ = service rate per server, which can be calculated assuming the current load and average service time. If the average service time per patient is hypothesized to be 15 minutes (0.25 hours), then μ = 1 / 0.25 = 4 patients/hour. Therefore:

ρ = 40 / (2 * 4) = 40 / 8 = 5

Since utilization cannot exceed 1, the assumed service time may need adjustment, or the arrival rate is too high for the current staffing. Proper queuing calculations suggest that to keep the system stable, the service rate per server must exceed the arrival rate per server.

Assuming the system operates within capacity, the average wait time in the queue can be calculated using the formula:

Wq = (ρ^2) / (μ * (1 - ρ))

Precisely, for such calculations, a detailed system model would be used, but in simplified terms, high utilization implies longer wait times, emphasizing the need for efficient staffing or process improvements to reduce patient wait times.

Cycle Time and Standard Time Calculation

Cycle time measurements are crucial for process analysis. With ten observed cycle times averaging 17 minutes and an allowance factor of 20%, the standard time incorporates allowances for fatigue, delays, and other unavoidable delays.

The standard time is computed by increasing the average cycle time by the allowance factor:

Standard Time = Average Cycle Time × (1 + Allowance Factor) = 17 minutes × (1 + 0.20) = 17 × 1.20 = 20.4 minutes

This indicates that each task should be scheduled for approximately 20.4 minutes to accommodate allowances, ensuring realistic process planning and staffing.

Productivity Ratio and Sensitivity Analysis

The single-factor productivity ratio (SPPR) is a measure of output relative to input. Using hours of labor, the department's productivity is calculated as:

SPPR = Total Square Feet Maintained / Total Labor Hours Worked

Given 190,000 square feet maintained and 15,570 labor hours, the productivity is:

SPPR = 190,000 / 15,570 ≈ 12.2 square feet per hour

With an average hourly rate of $5.50 and 100 employees, the labor cost is $852,150 for September, but the productivity metric focuses on physical output per labor hour.

When performing sensitivity analysis, comparing the current productivity ratio of 12.2 with the previous month's 13.1 reveals a decrease, indicating reduced efficiency. The percentage decrease is calculated as:

Percentage decrease = [(13.1 - 12.2) / 13.1] × 100 ≈ 6.87%

This decline suggests the need to identify factors contributing to lower productivity and implement process improvements.

Investment in Equipment and Capital Decisions

Eliminating 25% of the labor force via new equipment involves evaluating the cost-benefit balance. With each employee working 173 hours per month, the total labor hours saved per employee eliminated is 173 hours. For 25 employees, total hours eliminated are:

25 × 173 = 4,325 hours

At an hourly wage of $5.50, this equates to cost savings of:

4,325 × $5.50 ≈ $23,788

The capital cost of $60,000 amortized over 3 years results in annual costs of:

$60,000 / 3 = $20,000 per year

Increased efficiency may justify investment if the annual savings surpass the annualized equipment cost. The estimated annual savings from labor reduction ($23,788) exceeds the annual equipment amortization ($20,000), suggesting this investment could be prudent, provided other factors are favorable.

Capacity and Staffing Analysis

Calculating full-time equivalents (FTEs) per occupied bed helps in capacity planning. For example, if a hospital reports a certain number of employees, patient census, and occupancy rates, FTE calculations are essential. Using hospital data and ensuring staffing aligns with patient demand are critical for quality care and cost-effective operations.

Conclusion

Effective healthcare management hinges on applying quantitative analysis tools such as moving averages, queuing theory, productivity ratios, and financial evaluation of capital investments. These tools enable healthcare organizations to improve service reliability, optimize resource utilization, and achieve quality goals. Continual process evaluation and data-driven decision-making are vital for adapting to changing demands and maintaining high standards of patient care.

References

• Heizer, J., Render, B., & Munson, C. (2017). Operations Management (12th ed.). Pearson.
• Chase, R. B., Jacobs, F. R., & Aquilano, N. J. (2006). Operations Management for Competitive Advantage (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• Krajewski, L. J., Ritzman, L. P., & Malhotra, M. (2016). Operations Management: Processes and Supply Chains (12th ed.). Pearson.
• Levine, H. (2017). Introduction to Queueing Theory. Wiley.
• Baker, C. R. (2018). Health Care Operations Management. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
• Fitzsimmons, J. A., & Fitzsimmons, M. J. (2014). Service Management: Operations, Strategy, Information Technology. McGraw-Hill.
• Institute of Healthcare Improvement. (2020). Improving Healthcare Quality and Patient Safety. IHI Publications.
• National Healthcare Safety Network. (2019). Resources for Capacity Planning. CDC.
• Ginter, P. M., Duncan, W. J., & Swayne, L. E. (2018). The Strategy Focused Organization. Jossey-Bass.
• Ross, S. M. (2014). Introduction to Probability and Statistics for Engineer and Scientists. Elsevier.