Part I Assume The United Nations Educational Scientif 441447

Part I1assume The United Nations Educational Scientific And Cultura

Part I1assume The United Nations Educational Scientific And Cultura

Assume the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) hired you as an economic development expert. Your mission is to travel to several developing countries (Mexico, Nigeria, Egypt, Iran, and Lebanon), which have been suffering from the "brain drain" disease for more than four decades. Every year, millions of college graduates and highly educated and skilled professionals leave their countries to seek permanent residency and citizenship in Australia, Canada, United States, Western Europe, and whichever country taking them. Your assignment is threefold: a) To analyze the economic, social, cultural (including religious), and political reasons why educated and skilled professionals leave their countries; b) To determine who is gaining and who is losing from such an unprecedented mass exodus (i.e., the immigrant, the immigrant’s family, the home country, and the host country); c) To develop a set of policy measures that could help reduce human capital flight and encourage return of the expatriates.

Assume the United Nations hired you as a development economist. Your assignment is to travel to several countries in the Middle East and North Africa (e.g., Libya, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia), which have allocated billions of dollars over the past three decades to military expansion and modernization. Yet, they have not been able to offer economic prosperity and political freedom to their own people. Your assignment is threefold: a) To discuss the positive and negative effects of military spending in developing countries; b) To explore why these countries feel obliged to build large and modern armed forces; c) To propose an alternative approach to governance that will bring about prosperity and freedom to such deprived people.

Paper For Above instruction

The issue of brain drain from developing countries such as Mexico, Nigeria, Egypt, Iran, and Lebanon poses significant challenges to their economic, social, cultural, and political stability. Skilled professionals often leave these nations due to limited opportunities, political instability, inadequate healthcare, and educational systems, as well as socio-political factors like corruption and lack of governance. Conversely, host countries such as Australia, Canada, and the United States benefit by gaining highly educated labor, which helps them fill skilled labor shortages, foster innovation, and contribute to economic growth. However, the home countries suffer from a loss of human capital essential for development, while their governments face difficulties in providing adequate services and infrastructure. The diaspora sometimes remits substantial funds back home, alleviating poverty temporarily but not addressing the root causes of emigration. Solutions include policy measures such as improving domestic educational infrastructure, creating conducive environments for professional growth, offering incentives for expatriates to return, and fostering regional cooperation to develop local opportunities (Docquier & Marfouk, 2006; Beine et al., 2014).

Regarding military spending in Middle Eastern and North African countries such as Libya, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia, these expenditures often serve dual purposes. On the positive side, military investments may bolster national security, stabilize regimes, and project regional power which can deter external threats. However, negative effects include significant opportunity costs: diverting resources from critical sectors such as education, health, and economic development; increasing national debt; and escalating regional arms races that exacerbate political tensions. Many of these countries invest heavily in military forces driven by geopolitical conflicts, internal security concerns, and a desire for strategic dominance, often fueled by petro-dollars and regional rivalries (Byman & Pollack, 2001). An alternative approach should focus on strengthening governance, promoting inclusive political institutions, encouraging economic diversification, and enhancing social services, which can build internal stability and economic resilience without reliance on military might (Sadiq & Said, 2013).

References

  • Beine, M., Noël, R., & Ragot, L. (2014). Determinants of the international mobility of students. Economica, 81(324), 557-580.
  • Docquier, F., & Marfouk, A. (2006). International migration by education level: Innovative measurement and evidence from 1990-2000. Population Economics, 19(1), 55–70.
  • Byman, D. L., & Pollack, K. M. (2001). The dynamics of military spending and regional security in the Middle East. International Security Journal, 26(2), 87-122.
  • Sadiq, N., & Said, Y. (2013). Governance reforms and economic stability in the Middle East. Middle Eastern Studies Review, 17(3), 305-320.