Performance Feedback: The Results Of Behavior Completion

Performance Feedback1feedback Is The Results Of Behavior Communicat

Performance Feedback : 1. Feedback is the results of behavior communicated to the trainee for his use and learning regarding his past performance. There are several types of feedback: a. Positive Feedback – Feedback that states approval of past performance and usually results in an increase in the rate of the approved behavior. b. Negative Feedback – Feedback that states disapproval of past performance and usually produces a decrease in the rate of the disapproved behavior. c. Directive Feedback – Information about past performance that is presented to the performer and that is neither approving nor disapproving. 2. General Pointers on Performance Feedback: a. Give it ASAP. b. Don’t hedge your statement. c. Timing is critical. d. Do not give feedback when you are angry. e. Active listening is important. f. Be tactful but be specific. g. The more frequent the feedback, the more impact it has on behavior. h. Be consistent. 3. Ten Basic Rules on How to Give Feedback: a. Perceptions, reactions, and opinions should be presented as such and not as facts. b. Feedback should refer to relevant performance, behavior, or outcomes and not the individual as a person. c. Feedback should be in terms of specific observable behavior, not global or general assertions. d. When feedback has to be evaluative, rather than descriptive, it should be in terms of established criteria, probable outcomes, or possible improvement, as opposed to making judgments, such as “good” or “bad”. e. Feedback in an area of performance should include a discussion of what is viewed as “high” and “low” points of that performance and the specific behaviors that appear to be contributing to or limiting full effectiveness or accomplishment. f. In discussing problem areas where there are technical or established procedures for achieving solutions, suggestions should be made regarding possible means of improving performance. g. Feedback should avoid “loaded” terms that produce emotional reactions or raised defenses. h. Feedback should be concerned with those areas over which the trainee can exercise some control and given in ways that indicate how feedback can be used for improvement or planning alternative actions. i. When encountering raised defenses or emotional reactions, the FTO giving the feedback should deal with these rather than trying to convince, reason, or supply additional information. j. Feedback should be given in a manner that communicates acceptance of the receiver as a worthwhile person and of that person’s right to be different. END OF READING. Write an introduction (1 page) to the demographic or diversity issue of your choice. Explain why you consider this important as it relates to the criminal justice system. Perhaps provide an example to guide your instructor in understanding your rationale for this choice. Choose a social demographic or diversity issue that you think may have a significant impact on the criminal justice system. Race is generally considered an issue in this realm. However, do you see any other demographic that may have an effect, cause a dilemma, or be the foundation for policy or procedural change? Age, ethnicity, religion, culture, SES, educational level, physical/mental ability (disability) are variables you may want to consider. 2. Submit an annotated bibliography upon which your voiceover PowerPoint presentation (based on the demographic or diversity issue chosen above) is to be based. This will act as the foundation of your research and guide your presentation. Submit an annotated bibliography with at least seven (7) valid sources that you will use as the basis for your presentation.

Paper For Above instruction

The importance of addressing diversity issues within the criminal justice system cannot be overstated, as it directly affects fairness, effectiveness, and community relations. As societies become increasingly diverse, understanding how various demographic variables influence interactions with law enforcement, judicial proceedings, and correctional institutions is vital for fostering justice and equity. This introduction will focus on the issue of age diversity, highlighting its significance and potential impact on the criminal justice system.

Age is a critical demographic factor that influences criminal behavior, perceptions, and policy responses. Young offenders, for instance, often face different challenges compared to older adults, including developmental issues, societal perceptions, and juvenile justice policies. Conversely, elderly populations encounter unique circumstances, such as vulnerability to exploitation or increased healthcare needs within the justice context. The disparities in how age groups are treated and the policies tailored to their needs can create dilemmas and call for procedural changes to ensure fair treatment for all.

Considering age in criminal justice is crucial because it affects the design of intervention strategies, sentencing, and rehabilitation programs. For example, juvenile offenders may benefit from restorative justice practices that focus on rehabilitation and reintegration, whereas adult offenders might require different correctional approaches. Likewise, aging populations in the criminal justice system may require age-appropriate facilities and services to address their unique needs. Recognizing these distinctions promotes the development of inclusive policies that respect the developmental and physical differences across age groups.

An illustrative case involves youth violence and the juvenile justice system's response. If society perceives youth offenses as mere misconduct, policies may overlook underlying social and developmental issues, leading to punitive measures rather than rehabilitative solutions. In contrast, with an age-sensitive approach, interventions can focus on education, mental health support, and community engagement, ultimately reducing recidivism and promoting positive social outcomes.

Thus, integrating age as a diversity variable within the criminal justice framework enhances the system’s fairness and efficacy. It encourages tailored approaches that respect developmental stages, physical capabilities, and societal contributions of different age groups. As the demographic landscape continues to evolve, addressing age-related issues becomes increasingly essential to adapt policies and practices that serve justice equitably across all age segments.

Annotated Bibliography

1. Feld, B. C. (2010). Bad Kids: Race and the Transformation of the Juvenile Court. Oxford University Press. This book examines racial disparities in juvenile justice but also discusses age-related policies and their implications for youth offenders.
2. Piquero, A. R., & Piquero, N. L. (2018). Age and criminality: A review of the literature. In Criminology: Exploring Diverse Perspectives (pp. 112-130). Routledge. This chapter explores how age influences criminal behavior and justice responses across different systems.
3. Mears, D. P., & Cochran, J. C. (2015). Prisoner Reentry and the Challenges of Aging Prisoners. The Future of Children, 25(2), 101-118. This article discusses issues related to aging populations within the correctional system and implications for policy reform.
4. Howell, J. C. (2013). Guilty by Reason of Age: Youth, Crime, and Justice in America. Sage Publications. This publication provides an analysis of how age influences juvenile justice policies and practices.
5. National Research Council. (2013). The Juvenile Justice System: Panel on Juvenile Crime, Prevention, and Intervention. National Academies Press. This report discusses policy considerations related to juvenile offenders across age groups.
6. Schwartz, K., & Gilliard, J. (2017). Age Disparities in the Criminal Justice System: Policy and Practice. Criminal Justice Studies, 30(4), 385-401. This paper explores disparities related to age and suggests strategies for equitable treatment.
7. Fazel, S., & Seena, L. (2012). Mental Illness in Prisoners: A Review of the Literature and Policy Implications. The Lancet Psychiatry, 1(4), 312-320. This article discusses the intersection of mental health, age, and criminal justice.
8. Hagan, J., & Smadi, O. (2018). The Impact of Age and Culture on Sentencing and Rehabilitation. Journal of Criminal Justice, 54, 75-84. This research explores how age and cultural factors influence sentencing practices.
9. Kirk, D. S. (2008). Counterproductive deterrence: A critique of the “scarlet letter” effect of juvenile justice sanctions. Crime & Delinquency, 54(1), 10-30. This work examines the effect of age-specific sanctions and their deterrent efficacy.
10. Walker, S., Spohn, C., & DeLozier, K. (2012). The Color of Justice: Race, Ethnicity, and Crime in America. Wadsworth Publishing. While focusing on race, this book also discusses how demographic variables like age impact justice outcomes.