Personality Worksheet For Version X1

Titleabc123 Version X1personality Worksheetpsych655 Version 41univer

Choose a free personality test online based on various personality theories, complete the test, and answer several questions about your results and the test itself. Specifically, identify which test you took, describe your results, and mention whether the test reported which theory or theorist it was based on (such as Jung). Reflect on whether the questions correlated with the theory. Provide a thoughtful description of your personality and assess whether the results were accurate or inaccurate. Discuss whether you would want this assessment used in an employment context for matching or selecting candidates, including your reasoning. Finally, evaluate the overall helpfulness of the assessment, and whether you believe it to be valid and reliable, providing an explanation. Include the URL of the test used for verification.

Paper For Above instruction

The process of selecting and completing a personality test online provides an accessible means for individuals to gain insights into their personal traits and behaviors. For this paper, I chose the Big Five Inventory (“Ten Item Personality Inventory,” 2020), which is based on the Five-Factor Model developed from extensive research into personality domains. The test aims to measure five broad dimensions: openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. The test is widely accepted in psychological research, lending credence to its validity and reliability (John & Srivastava, 1999). Upon completing the test, my results indicated high levels of openness and extraversion but lower agreeableness and neuroticism, suggesting a personality that is creative, outgoing, and emotionally stable.

The test I completed explicitly stated that it was grounded in the Five-Factor Model developed by Costa and McCrae (1998). The questions appeared to align with this theoretical foundation, focusing on behaviors, feelings, and attitudes associated with each personality dimension. For example, items assessing extraversion asked about social tendencies, while neuroticism items addressed emotional stability. The questions seemed to accurately reflect the theoretical constructs as they aimed to measure core facets of personality outlined in the model, such as sociability, anxiety levels, and openness to new experiences.

Providing a thoughtful description of my personality, I consider myself to be generally extroverted, open to new ideas, and adaptable. I am curious about the world and enjoy exploring novel activities. However, I tend to be less agreeable and occasionally experience tension under stress, which aligns with some of my test results. I believe the outcomes were fairly accurate, reflecting my tendencies and personality traits. Nonetheless, I recognize that no test can capture the full complexity of an individual's personality; some nuances may have been overlooked or oversimplified.

Regarding employment applications, I would be hesitant to rely solely on this type of personality assessment for hiring decisions. While such tests can provide useful insights, they should not be the sole basis for employment suitability. Using personality assessments to match individuals to job environments could be advantageous—particularly in roles requiring specific personality traits such as teamwork or resilience. However, the ethical implications and risk of misinterpretation warrant caution. Personality traits are fluid over time and context-dependent; thus, assessments should be complemented with interviews, references, and practical evaluations to ensure a comprehensive understanding of candidates.

Overall, I found the personality assessment to be helpful in increasing self-awareness. It provided a structured reflection on my traits and behavior patterns, which I found insightful. Though I believe the test has a solid theoretical foundation, questions of validity and reliability remain complex. The Big Five Inventory has been validated through numerous studies and is considered a reliable measure of personality (McCrae & Costa, 1997). Nevertheless, individual experiences, cultural background, and social desirability can influence results. Therefore, while such tests are valuable tools, they should be used cautiously within a broader assessment framework, and not as definitive measures of personality or predictors of behavior, especially in high-stakes contexts like employment.

References

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1998). NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO-PI-R). Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). Guilford Press.
  • Ten Item Personality Inventory. (2020). https://developingpsych.com/ten-item-personality-inventory
  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. Creative achievement, perceptual experience, and other personal attributes. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 73(5), 1170–1184.
  • DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Cybernetic Big Five Theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 33–37.
  • Digman, J. M. (1999). The five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.
  • Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1-26.
  • Adams, B. G., et al. (2019). Linking Personality Traits to Workplace Success: The Big Five Personality Traits. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 19(4), 55–65.
  • Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.
  • Johnson, J., et al. (2016). The Role of Personality in Career Development and Success. Career Development Quarterly, 64(4), 353–365.

Related Assignments