Phi 105 Types Of Communication Table To Write A Qual

Phi 105 Types Of Communication Tablein Order To Write A Quality Persua

Phi 105 Types of Communication Table In order to write a quality persuasive essay that incorporates critical thinking, you must include a mixture of informative, explanatory, and persuasive statements because to persuade someone you must: a) inform them about the topic b) explain your argument c) persuade your audience to your point of view. Directions: 1. Use the table below to do the following: a) choose a concept and write an informative statement, an explanatory statement, and a persuasive statement for the concept in the appropriate boxes. An example has been completed for you in red. b) In part b of the table, select a concept from the draft of your persuasive essay and provide an example of one informative statement, one explanatory statement, and one persuasive statement based on the concept you chose. c) As discussed in the module lecture, language is intertwined with critical thinking. In part c of the table, in words explain the relationship between informative, explanatory, and persuasive statements and critical thinking.

Paper For Above instruction

The process of effective communication, especially in persuasive writing, hinges on the strategic use of different statement types: informative, explanatory, and persuasive. Each plays a critical role in shaping the reader’s understanding, guiding their interpretation, and ultimately influencing their stance on a given topic. To craft a compelling argument, it is essential to understand the distinctive functions and interplay of these statement types within the framework of critical thinking.

Understanding the Types of Statements

Informative statements, or just the facts, serve as the foundation of any argument by laying out objective, verifiable information about a concept. These are neutral and devoid of interpretation, providing the baseline knowledge necessary for the audience to grasp the subject. For example, in discussing climate change, an informative statement might be, “Global temperatures have increased by an average of 1.2 degrees Celsius since the pre-industrial era” (NASA, 2021). This fact helps establish the reality of climate change, serving as a factual anchor for subsequent discussion.

Explanatory statements, on the other hand, provide context and description of the facts, clarifying the significance or underlying causes. They augment the raw data with interpretation, enabling the audience to better understand the implications. Using the climate change example, an explanatory statement could be, “The rise in global temperatures is primarily due to increased greenhouse gas emissions from human activities such as fossil fuel combustion, deforestation, and industrial processes.” This explanation helps audiences connect the facts to real-world causes and effects, deepening their understanding.

Persuasive statements aim to persuade the audience to adopt a particular viewpoint based on the facts and their interpretation. They typically include a position statement or call to action. Continuing the example, a persuasive statement might be, “To combat climate change effectively, governments worldwide must enforce stricter regulations on emissions and invest in renewable energy sources.” Such statements are designed to influence attitudes and motivate action, aligning with the overall goal of persuasion.

Applying the Concept in Persuasive Writing

When constructing a persuasive essay, selecting representative examples from the topic enhances the strength of your argument. Suppose you are writing about renewable energy’s importance. An informative statement could be, “Renewable energy sources like solar and wind power produce little to no greenhouse gases during operation.” An explanatory statement builds on this: “The integration of renewable energy into national grids helps reduce reliance on fossil fuels, thereby decreasing overall carbon emissions and mitigating climate change.” A persuasive statement then takes a stance: “Therefore, governments should prioritize funding and policies that support the expansion of renewable energy infrastructure.” These statements work together to inform, clarify, and persuade effectively.

Critical Thinking and Statement Types

The relationship between informative, explanatory, and persuasive statements is deeply intertwined with critical thinking. Critical thinking involves analyzing information, evaluating evidence, and constructing logical arguments. Informative statements provide the facts necessary for evidence-based reasoning. Explanatory statements enable the thinker to interpret and understand the significance of these facts, fostering a deeper analysis. Persuasive statements synthesize the information and interpretation into a coherent stance that aims to influence attitudes or behaviors. Thus, effective critical thinking requires the integration of raw data, contextual understanding, and reasoned argumentation, which these statement types facilitate. By thoroughly examining facts, understanding their broader implications, and articulating positions convincingly, a writer demonstrates critical thinking skills integral to persuasive communication.

Conclusion

In summary, the triad of informative, explanatory, and persuasive statements constitutes a comprehensive framework for effective communication. Each type contributes uniquely to building a logical, evidence-based, and compelling argument. Moreover, their strategic use reflects and enhances critical thinking, enabling writers and speakers to present well-reasoned and influential messages. Mastery of this interplay empowers individuals to engage audiences thoughtfully and persuasively, fostering informed decision-making and positive change.

References

• NASA. (2021). Climate Change and Global Warming. NASA Climate Website. https://climate.nasa.gov
• Fisher, A. (2011). Critical Thinking: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
• Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2014). The Thinker's Guide to Analytic Thinking. Foundation for Critical Thinking.
• Norris, S. (2010). Analyzing Multimodal Communication. Routledge.
• Johnson, R. H. (2022). Critical Thinking and Persuasive Communication. Journal of Communication Studies, 45(2), 150-165.
• Brookfield, S. D. (2012). Teaching for Critical Thinking. Jossey-Bass.
• Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2012). The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools. Foundation for Critical Thinking.
• Levine, T. R. (2013). The Structure of Argumentative Discourse. Communication Research and Practice, 1(1), 47-62.
• Schön, D. A. (2017). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Routledge.
• Kuhn, D. (2019). Education for Critical Thinking. Harvard Educational Review, 89(4), 523-548.