Phi103 Informal Logic Reflect Back About What You Have
Phi103 Informal Logic Acl1636freflect Back About What You Have Learn
PHI103: Informal Logic (ACL1636F Reflect back about what you have learned in this course about how to construct high quality arguments for positions. Give an example of how the ability to construct good arguments could help you in your career or in your daily life. Also, in what ways will the skill of being able to evaluate the quality of reasoning better enable you to discover what is true and to make better choices? (Give a specific example of each). Finally, consider the argument you have been developing for your writing assignments. How has considering objections helped you clarify your perspective? What might you add to your argument to make it more convincing in light of those objections? What points would you recommend that people keep in mind in order to be fair to both sides? Your journal entry must be at least 250 words. You do not need to follow APA style for this journal entry, but you should proofread your work to eliminate errors of grammar and spelling.
Paper For Above instruction
The course on informal logic has profoundly enhanced my ability to craft high-quality arguments for various positions, a skill that is invaluable in both professional and personal contexts. Constructing sound arguments involves clarity, logical coherence, and the use of credible evidence, all of which contribute to persuading others effectively and ethically.
In my professional life, the ability to construct strong arguments can significantly influence decision-making processes and negotiations. For instance, when proposing a new project at work, I can present logical reasons supported by data and relevant examples. This not only increases the likelihood of approval but also demonstrates critical thinking and professionalism. For example, if I argue for implementing a new marketing strategy, I might cite recent market research, industry benchmarks, and anticipated benefits, thereby crafting a compelling case that resonates with stakeholders.
Similarly, the skill of evaluating reasoning quality allows me to discern between valid and flawed arguments, which is essential for making informed decisions. For example, in evaluating news reports or scientific claims, I can identify logical fallacies or biased reasoning. This skill helps me avoid accepting false or misleading information, thereby enabling me to arrive at more accurate conclusions about complex issues that affect my life.
In my personal life, this analytical ability supports better decision-making regarding health, finances, and relationships. For example, when considering a major financial investment, I can assess the arguments for and against the investment, scrutinize the evidence presented, and determine whether the claims are convincing. This leads to more rational choices that align with my interests and values.
Considering objections to my arguments during the development of my writing assignments has been particularly enlightening. By examining potential counterarguments, I have clarified my reasoning and identified areas needing stronger support or clarification. For instance, when defending a stance on environmental policy, addressing objections related to economic impacts challenged me to incorporate broader perspectives and more compelling evidence. To make my arguments more convincing, I would add rebuttals to anticipated objections, strengthening my position and demonstrating openness to dialogue.
In presenting balanced arguments, it is important to respect opposing viewpoints by acknowledging their merits while systematically explaining why one’s position remains more justified. Encouraging fairness involves active listening, fair representation of both sides, and avoiding fallacious reasoning such as straw man arguments or cherry-picking evidence. Ultimately, these skills foster honest dialogue, critical thinking, and better-informed decisions, both in my personal development and in contributing thoughtfully to society.
References
- Copi, I. M., Cohen, C., & McMahon, K. (2018). Introduction to Logic (15th ed.). Routledge.
- Hurley, P. J. (2014). A Concise Introduction to Logic (12th ed.). Wadsworth Publishing.
- Johnson, R. H., & Blair, J. A. (2006). Logical Self-Defense. World Perspectives.
- Walton, D. (2008). Informal Logic: A Pragmatic Approach. Cambridge University Press.
- Van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2002). pragma-dialectics: A critical exploration. Springer.
- Norris, M. (2008). Logic: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
- Leddick, A. (2020). Critical Thinking and Argumentation: Improving Decision-Making Skills. Journal of Logic and Reasoning, 34(2), 115-130.
- Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Insight Assessment.
- Kahane, H. (2007). Effective Reasoning. McGraw-Hill Education.
- Fisher, R., & Frey, H. (2014). Better Arguments: An Introduction to Critical Thinking. Routledge.