PHL 111 Milestone One Guidelines And Rubric Overview ✓ Solved

PHL 111 Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric Overview: For

For your final project in this course, you will write a critical essay in which you use critical thinking skills to examine an argument presented in an article that is associated with your chosen topic. You will examine the argument’s logic, reasoning, bias, and credibility, and then apply the same critical thinking skills to developing your own alternative argument. You will then reflect on how you can apply this process to other areas and situations in your life. In the Module One journal assignment, you chose a topic and article that you will focus on for your final project. In this milestone, which is a first step toward the successful completion of your final project, you will introduce the article that you have chosen and begin to assess and analyze the argument asserted in the article.

Prompt: Complete the Milestone One Worksheet and use your answers to draft a paragraph for each of the sections below. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:

I. Introduction: To begin your essay, you will formally introduce your real-world topic. As the foundation of your paper, your introduction should engage the audience and establish any necessary background.

A. Provide a brief overview of the topic. For example, you might consider the premise of the conversation and why the topic is being discussed.

B. Describe any personal connection you have to the topic. Why is the topic of particular interest to you?

II. Presented Argument: In this section, you will explore the argument in your chosen artifact. You will uncover the logical structure of the argument and investigate any bias behind its claims.

A. Describe the argument made by the artifact.

B. Identify key facts, research, or resources the argument is based on. Provide specific examples to support your identification.

C. Describe the logic and reasoning used to advance the argument and any gaps or weaknesses present. Consider the premises and conclusion advanced in the artifact, and the questions that are left unanswered.

Paper For Above Instructions

For this critical essay, I will examine the topic of climate change and its societal impacts, as discussed in the article "The Climate Crisis: A Time for Change." This topic has emerged as a vital concern in contemporary discourse due to the escalating evidence of climate-related disasters, policy changes, and societal shifts. The main premise of the article asserts that human activities have significantly contributed to climate change, necessitating immediate action to mitigate its effects. The discussions surrounding climate change have intensified in relevance as natural disasters have become more frequent and severe, underscoring the urgency of addressing this global issue. My personal connection to this topic arises from my experiences in a coastal community deeply affected by rising sea levels and increased hurricane activity, making it of particular interest to me.

The argument presented in the article emphasizes the significant role of anthropogenic factors in climate change. The author cites scientific research indicating that greenhouse gas emissions from human activities, such as burning fossil fuels and deforestation, are primary contributors to global warming. Key facts supporting this assertion include data from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and empirical studies demonstrating a correlation between industrialization and rising global temperatures. For instance, the article references a 2021 study indicating that human actions have raised the Earth’s temperature by approximately 1.2 degrees Celsius since pre-industrial times. This data serves to bolster the article’s claims about the urgency of addressing climate change.

Examining the logic and reasoning employed in the article reveals significant structures that underpin its argument. The author employs a logical progression from evidence to conclusion: highlighting the causes of climate change, presenting its impacts on the environment and society, and finally, advocating for action. However, the article is not without its gaps. While it effectively outlines the immediate consequences of climate change, it leaves unanswered questions regarding long-term solutions and the role of individual versus collective responsibility in addressing this crisis. Furthermore, the author could expand on how political factors and socioeconomic disparities influence the climate change debate, revealing weaknesses in the argument’s scope. Therefore, a notable gap in the article is the lack of detailed discussion on viable paths forward and the complexities of implementing changes on a global scale.

In conclusion, this critical examination of the chosen article concerning climate change reveals both the powerful arguments presented and the gaps that warrant further exploration. Through this process, I have gained insights into how critical thinking can be applied not only to academic contexts but also to my understanding of global issues impacting my community and the world. This reflective exercise has underscored the importance of engaging with such critical discussions and seeking informed solutions.

References

• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis.
• Nordhaus, W. D. (2013). The Climate Casino: Risk, Uncertainty, and Economics for a Warming World. Yale University Press.
• McKibben, B. (2019). Falter: Has the Human Game Begun to Play Itself Out? Henry Holt and Co.
• Maslin, M. (2019). Climate Change: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
• Houghton, R. A. (2015). Global Carbon Emissions. Earth System Science Data, 7(1), 151-158.
• World Meteorological Organization. (2021). State of the Global Climate 2020.
• Mastrorillo, M., et al. (2016). The role of individual behaviors in reducing greenhouse gas emissions: A review. Ecological Economics, 130, 242-254.
• Oreskes, N. (2014). The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change. Science, 306(5702), 1686.
• United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2021). The Paris Agreement.
• Pachauri, R. K., & Mayer, L. (Eds.). (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. IPCC.