Piktochart Instructions1 Go To 000532

Piktochart Instructions1 Piktochart Instructions1 Go To Httpspik

Compare and contrast the two events motivated by incentives, one where the self-interested behavior was good for society and the other where it was bad. Analyze each event's main issue, points of view, supporting evidence, and consequences. Develop a thesis that clearly states the purpose of comparing these two events, and support it with thorough analysis. The essay should be approximately 500 words, including a discussion of the merit of each event and a conclusion that summarizes the comparison, addresses implications, and reaffirms the thesis.

Paper For Above instruction

The analysis of incentives-driven behavior in contrasting societal outcomes offers valuable insights into the ethical and practical implications of individual self-interest. This essay compares two historically and ethically significant events: Samuel P. Langley's pioneering work on the world's first aircraft, which advanced societal progress, and the Wells Fargo scandal, which exemplifies detrimental self-interested behavior. By critically evaluating each event's core issues, perspectives, evidence, and societal impacts, we can better understand how incentives influence human actions for good or ill.

Introduction

The motivation behind individual or organizational behavior driven by incentives can either promote societal well-being or cause significant harm. While self-interest often spurs innovation and progress, it can also lead to unethical decisions and societal detriment. This essay compares the merit of two such events: Samuel P. Langley's development of the world's first aircraft, which resulted in advancements beneficial to society, and the Wells Fargo banking scandal, which caused public harm and eroded trust. The purpose is to analyze and contrast these actions by evaluating their issues, evidence, perspectives, and implications.

Samuel P. Langley's Aircraft Development: A Good-Willed Incentive

Langley's efforts to create the first successful aircraft represented a pursuit of technological and scientific progress. The main issue centered on achieving powered flight, which he believed could revolutionize transportation and benefit society by increasing connectivity and economic development. Langley's project was driven by a combination of personal curiosity, national pride, and scientific curiosity, with the hope of contributing to human mobility. The evidence supporting the merit of Langley's work includes documented experimental successes, technological innovations, and the eventual influence on subsequent aviation developments. His intent appeared to be rooted in the greater good, aiming to foster progress rather than personal financial gain. The consequences of his efforts were largely positive in advancing aerospace technology and inspiring future innovations. Societally, the invention of aircraft has saved countless lives, connected distant regions, and driven economic growth. Therefore, the incentives aligned with societal progress and demonstrated that self-interested scientific pursuits can yield beneficial outcomes.

The Wells Fargo Scandal: A Detrimental Self-Interested Behavior

The Wells Fargo scandal exemplifies how incentives can motivate unethical actions with harmful societal consequences. The primary issue was the bank's aggressive sales targets incentivizing employees to open millions of unauthorized accounts to meet quotas and earn bonuses. This behavior was driven by corporate incentives favoring short-term profit over ethical standards and customer trust. Unlike Langley's case, the evidence revealed systemic misconduct, falsified documents, and significant financial and reputational damages to consumers and the institution. The perspectives in this case often included internal pressures, a corporate culture prioritizing profits, and the neglect of customer welfare. The consequences were severe: widespread consumer deception, legal penalties, loss of public trust, and long-term damage to the company's reputation. This scandal underscores how incentives can distort moral judgment, leading to harmful outcomes detrimental to society at large. It demonstrates that when self-interest is misaligned with societal values and ethics, the result can be damaging rather than beneficial.

Comparison and Contrast

Both events reveal that incentives significantly influence human behavior, but their outcomes differ based on the underlying motivations and ethical considerations. Langley's pursuit was driven by a desire to advance human knowledge, aligning self-interest with societal benefit. The evidence supports the notion that genuine innovation often results from pursuing a higher purpose, leading to positive societal change. Conversely, the Wells Fargo case illustrates that incentives rooted solely in profit maximization without ethical safeguards can corrupt individual judgment and harm society. The evidence indicates systemic misconduct and emphasizes the importance of aligning incentives with ethical standards to prevent harm.

Analyzing perspectives, Langley's work was broadly supported by the scientific community and viewed as an advancement for humanity, whereas Wells Fargo's actions faced widespread condemnation for violating consumer trust and legal standards. The consequences highlight a stark dichotomy: Langley's actions facilitated societal progress, while Wells Fargo's misconduct inflicted tangible harm and eroded societal trust.

This comparison underscores the importance of designing incentives that promote ethical behavior aligned with societal values. While self-interest can motivate innovation, it must be managed carefully to prevent unethical practices that can damage societal fabric.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the merit of incentives-driven behavior depends heavily on the ethical framework guiding those incentives. The case of Samuel P. Langley's pioneering efforts demonstrates that self-interest, when aligned with societal benefit, can foster innovation and progress. Conversely, the Wells Fargo scandal illustrates how misaligned incentives can promote damaging behaviors detrimental to society. Understanding these contrasting outcomes emphasizes the need for ethical incentives in organizational and individual pursuits. Accepting that incentives influence behavior profoundly, policymakers and organizations must prioritize ethical standards to ensure that self-interest ultimately serves societal good rather than harm. Thus, fostering a balanced approach to incentives can sustain innovation while safeguarding societal trust and wellbeing, reinforcing the critical role of ethics in incentive design.

References

• Bhidé, A. (2000). The Origins of Creativity and Innovation. Harvard Business Review.
• Calabrese, C. (2017). Ethical Incentives and Corporate Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(4), 601-612.
• Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business. The New York Times Magazine.
• Kaminsky, G., & Reinhart, C. (1999). The Twin Crises: The Causes of Banking and Balance-of-Payments Problems. American Economic Review, 89(3), 473-500.
• Levitt, S. D., & Dubner, S. J. (2005). Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything. HarperCollins.
• McGinnis, J. M. (2014). Institutional Economic Incentives and Ethical Behavior. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 23(3), 682-706.
• Sull, D. (2009). How to Jump-Start Innovation. Harvard Business Review.
• Weitzman, M. L. (1998). Recombinant Growth. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(4), 3-22.
• Wilson, R. (2018). Incentive Structures and Organizational Behavior. Organizational Dynamics, 47(2), 109-117.
• Zeidan, O., & Zaid, A. (2021). Ethics, Incentives, and Organizational Culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 170(1), 125-137.