Place To Write Effectively Writers Must Know Their Place

Placeplaceto Write Effectively Writers Must Know Their Pla

Placeplaceto Write Effectively Writers Must Know Their Pla

P.L.A.C.E. P.L.A.C.E. To write effectively, writers ,must know their PLACE. To read thoughtfully, readers must be able to analyze the writer’s PLACE. The Writer’s PLACE To write effectively, the writer must analyze the writing situation.

This is also called the rhetorical situation. These are the five elements to consider: 1- Purpose 2-Language 3-Audience 4-Context 5-Evidence

1- Purpose What is your topic? Why do you want to write about this topic? How do you want to affect your readers’ attitude or behavior?

2- Language How can you use language to accomplish your purpose with your target audience? What style of writing should you use? Should your style be formal, professional, academic, conversational, friendly, casual? How close are you to your reader? What is the tone of your voice? Are you serious, funny, pleading, angry, thoughtful, amusing? How do your word choices and statements convey your tone? Should your diction be learned, standard, popular, colloquial, catchy? Will your reader be distracted by grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors?

3- Audience Who are your readers? Why should they care about your topic? How is it relevant to them? What do they already know about it? What do they need to know?

4- Context There are three contexts to consider: 1- the context of the writer 2-the context of the reader 3-the context of the subject

A-Context of the Writer The context of the writer includes: Genre Length (depth) Deadline Other considerations that affect the writer’s situation (fund available for research, computer technology available, photography, media support, other sources).

B-Context for the reader Context for the reader includes: Readers’ purpose Readers’ expectations of the genre and the presentation the physical situation of the reader encountering this writing.

C- Context of the Subject Context of the subject includes: What have others been saying about this topic? How are you entering into and adding to the “conversation” about this topic that is already in progress?

5-Evidence What do you think the way you do about this topic? What knowledge and experience do you have with this topic that has led to write? What support do you have for your thesis? Facts and statistics? Expert’s testimony? Personal experience and research? Values and beliefs (both yours and your readers)? “Th-th-th-that's all folks!"

2 Synthesis Paper Purpose In the previous assignment, your task was to read another writer's essay closely and offer a thoughtful interpretation of that essay's meaning through identifying and analyzing key features. The purpose of your synthesis paper is to provide your readers a fuller understanding of the meanings of a group of related essays.

You will build your paper around an interpretive conclusion — your perception of something important about the relationship among the meanings of the source essays. Your goal is to examine at least two articles, analyze their claims, evidence, and perspectives, and synthesize their ideas in a coherent discussion that explores their points of convergence or divergence.

Getting Started: Check Moodle and Share Drive. Your assignment is to choose one option from the following readings:...

Steps to write the Synthesis Paper include: read carefully, analyze each source’s arguments and evidence, identify relations among them, develop your own standpoints, imagine how authors might respond to your opinions, refine your thesis based on this imagined dialogue, and argue your position supported by references to the source articles.

Organize your paper by highlighting points of similarity and disparity among sources. An effective introduction summarizes background information on your topic, introduces the articles with relevant details, and states your thesis reflecting the main points or differences. The body develops organized points, either by all about one article and then another or point-by-point comparison. Conclude by summarizing your main insights and restating your thesis in light of your analysis.

Paper For Above instruction

The effective synthesis of multiple essays requires a nuanced understanding of each source’s argument, evidence, and underlying assumptions. In constructing a synthesis paper, the writer must critically read and analyze selected articles, identify their relationships, and develop a clear position that integrates their points while highlighting areas of agreement and contention.

In this context, the first step involves careful reading, paying particular attention to each author’s claims and supporting evidence. For instance, if selecting Kate Murphy’s “First Camera, Then Fork” and Taylor Clark’s “Meatless Like Me,” the student must analyze how Murphy advocates for food photography as an extension of life itself, supported by examples of social media use, while Clark explores misconceptions about vegetarianism with humor and personal anecdotes. Recognizing these differences and similarities allows the student to explore how each author constructs their narrative around food and identity—Murphy through cultural and technological lenses, Clark through individual experience and satire.

After analysis, the student must generalize their own stance regarding the issues discussed. For example, one may argue that visual culture profoundly influences perceptions of food and body image. Developing this position entails imagining responses from the authors—would Murphy agree that food photography shapes social discourse, or would she see it as a superficial trend? Might Clark’s humorous critique challenge or complement Murphy’s perspective? These imaginary dialogues enable the student to refine their thesis, making it more robust and nuanced.

Subsequently, the student must articulate and defend their position by incorporating evidence from the sources. For example, in arguing that visual representations, whether in food photography or media images of bodies, significantly impact societal standards, the writer can cite Murphy’s discussion of the social function of food photos and Orbach’s critique of advertising’s influence on women’s bodies. Engaging with the sources’ points allows the writer to create a cohesive argument, demonstrating how each contributes to understanding the deeper implications of visual culture—its power to shape attitudes and behaviors.

Organization is crucial for clarity. The paper may compare and contrast the authors’ perspectives, organize points thematically, or follow a point-by-point structure. Regardless, each paragraph should begin with a clear topic sentence, followed by analysis and specific examples. The conclusion should revisit the main points, acknowledge less emphasized issues, and reinforce the significance of the synthesized insights. Ultimately, a well-structured synthesis paper not only summarizes the sources but also advances a persuasive, well-supported argument about the topic.

References

• Murphy, K. (2019). First Camera, Then Fork. The New York Times.
• Clark, T. (2019). Meatless Like Me. Slate.
• Orbach, S. (2006). Fat Is an Advertising Issue. Campaign Magazine.
• McClelland, S. (2010). Distorted Images: Western Cultures Are Exporting Their Dangerous Obsession with Thinness.
• Zirin, D. (2010). Say It Ain’t So, Big Leagues.
• Lipsyte, R. (2009). Jocks VS. Pukes.
• Okrent, D. (2006). The Public Editor: No Picture Tells the Truth—The Best Do Better Than That. The New York Times.
• Porter, C. (2006). Tragedy in Oklahoma. Associated Press.
• Strupp, J. (2006). The Photo Felt Around the World.
• Additional scholarly sources as needed for comprehensive analysis.