Planning And Managerial Application Complete The Following T

Planning And Managerial Applicationcomplete The Following Activitiesa

Planning and Managerial Application Complete the following activities: A. Using the Internet, review at least 3 articles on Profit-Cost-Volume relationship. Summary (300 words or more) the articles in your own words. B. As a manager, why is Profit-cost-volume important in planning? Support your response with numerical example(s). C. Using the Internet, review at least 3 articles on Variable Costing. Summary (300 words or more) the articles in your own words. D. As a manager, discuss how you would use Variable Costing in managerial decisions Support your response with numerical example(s).

Paper For Above instruction

The concepts of profit, cost, and volume relationships are fundamental to managerial decision-making and planning within organizations. Analyzing the interactions among these variables enables managers to optimize operations, improve profitability, and make informed strategic decisions. This essay reviews recent literature on the profit-cost-volume (PCV) relationship and variable costing, discussing their importance and practical applications for managers.

Profit-Cost-Volume Relationship: An Overview

The profit-cost-volume analysis, often represented as break-even analysis, helps managers understand how changes in sales volume impact profitability. A key insight from recent articles is that understanding the breakeven point—the sales level at which total revenues equal total costs—is critical for setting achievable sales targets and pricing strategies. For example, one study emphasizes that dynamic market conditions require managers to continuously update their PCV analysis to adapt pricing and production levels. The articles highlight that fixed and variable costs influence the slope of the profit-volume graph, and recognizing how cost structures change with scale assists in decision-making regarding product lines and market expansion.

Research also suggests that the PCV relationship is vital in evaluating the profitability of different business segments. Managers can model how incremental sales affect overall profitability, considering fixed costs and contribution margins per unit. For instance, a numerical example demonstrates that if a company's fixed costs are $100,000, variable costs per unit are $50, and selling price per unit is $100, then the breakeven volume is 2000 units. Beyond this point, each additional unit sold contributes $50 to profit. These insights support strategic decisions related to pricing, production, and sales forecasts.

Importance of Profit-Cost-Volume in Planning

In managerial planning, understanding the PCV relationship offers several benefits. First, it aids in setting realistic sales targets by identifying the minimum sales volume required to cover costs. Second, it informs pricing strategies—managers can determine the necessary selling price to achieve desired profit levels. Third, PCV analysis assists in evaluating the financial impact of scaling operations, launching new products, or entering new markets.

Numerical examples illustrate these points. For example, if a manager aims for a profit of $50,000 with a contribution margin of $50 per unit, they need to sell at least 3,000 units, amortizing fixed costs and reaching profitability. Conversely, understanding the lower limit of sales helps avoid losses when sales fall below the breakeven point, especially crucial in volatile markets. Therefore, PCV analysis acts as a strategic tool for financial planning and risk management.

Variable Costing and Its Managerial Applications

Variable costing, also known as direct costing, differentiates between variable and fixed costs, assigning only variable costs to product costs. Recent articles reveal that variable costing provides clearer insights into cost behavior, especially when decisions depend on contribution margin analysis. Unlike absorption costing, variable costing facilitates better understanding of how changes in sales volume directly affect profitability, as fixed costs are treated as period expenses.

Numerical examples highlight this utility. Suppose a product has a selling price of $150, variable cost of $90, and fixed costs are $60,000 per period. Under variable costing, the contribution margin per unit is $60. If sales are projected at 2,000 units, total contribution margin is $120,000, covering fixed costs and generating profit. If sales increase to 3,000 units, contribution margin increases proportionally, enabling managers to determine the incremental impact on profits. This analysis helps managers decide whether to increase production, launch promotional campaigns, or discontinue products.

Using Variable Costing in Managerial Decisions

Managers utilize variable costing in several decision-making processes. For instance, during product line evaluation, variable costing helps determine which products contribute most to fixed costs and profit. It also supports pricing decisions; knowing the contribution margin allows managers to set minimum acceptable prices when facing competitive pressures. Additionally, in short-term decision-making, such as accepting or rejecting special orders, variable costing provides the necessary framework since fixed costs remain unchanged with volume fluctuations.

A practical example involves a manufacturer considering a special order at a lower price. If the incremental revenue exceeds the variable costs of producing the order, accepting it might improve overall profitability without affecting existing sales. Conversely, if variable costs outweigh additional revenue, rejecting the order is prudent. This decision hinges upon the insights gained from variable costing analysis.

In conclusion, both profitability analysis via PCV relationships and variable costing are indispensable tools for managers. They enable strategic planning, informed decision-making, and efficient management of resources, ultimately contributing to organizational profitability and sustainability. As markets evolve, continual application of these analytical techniques remains crucial for maintaining competitive advantage.

References

  • Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2-3), 127-168.
  • Garrison, R. H., Noreen, E. W., & Brewer, P. C. (2018). Managerial Accounting (16th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Drury, C. (2013). Management and Cost Accounting (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Hilton, R. W., & Platt, D. E. (2013). Managerial Accounting: Creating Value in a Dynamic Business Environment. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Horngren, C. T., Sundem, G. L., Stratton, W. O., & Burgstahler, D. (2014). Introduction to Management Accounting (16th ed.). Pearson.
  • Anthony, R. N., & Govindarajan, V. (2007). Management Control Systems. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
  • Kaplan, R. S., & Atkinson, A. A. (2015). Advanced Management Accounting. Pearson.
  • Hansen, D. R., & Mowen, M. M. (2014). Cost Management: A Strategic Emphasis. South-Western College Pub.
  • Drury, C. (2014). Cost and Management Accounting. Cengage Learning.
  • Langfield-Smith, K., Thorne, H., & Hilton, R. (2018). Management Accounting: Information for Managing and Growing Organizations. McGraw-Hill Education.

Related Assignments