Please Let Me Know If You Need To Be Refreshed From The Firs
Please let me know if you need to be refreshed from the first weeks assignment Primary Discussion Response is due by Friday (11:59:59pm Central), Peer Responses are due by Tuesday (11:59:59pm Central). Primary Task Response: Within the Discussion Board area, write 400–600 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas: In Week 1, you did a literature review. In your discussion, identify a project that you read about that most closely resembles the project that you are undertaking in this course.
Answer the following: What characteristics of the project are similar to your organizational characteristics? What goals of the project are most similar to your proposed goals? How might your results differ? Why?
Paper For Above instruction
In the initial week of the course, students conducted a literature review that enabled them to explore and understand various project types within their field of interest. Building on this foundation, the current discussion requires examining a project that closely resembles the one the student is undertaking in this course. This reflective activity aims to contextualize their project within existing research and real-world applications, fostering a deeper understanding of potential challenges and expected outcomes.
One of the key aspects of this assignment involves identifying the characteristics of the literature review project that align with the student's organizational environment. For instance, if a student is working on a project related to implementing a new information system within an organization, they might identify a similar project studied in scholarly literature that involved deploying enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems in a manufacturing firm. Characteristics such as project scope, stakeholder engagement, technological complexity, and timeline are crucial in establishing this similarity. Both projects may share the goal of streamlining operations, improving data accuracy, and reducing costs. Recognizing these similarities helps in understanding how theoretical models and results from past projects can be applied or adapted to the student's specific organizational context.
The goals of the identified project should be critically compared to the student's proposed goals. For example, if the literature review revealed a project aimed at increasing organizational efficiency through technological integration, and the student's project seeks to achieve similar improvements, this alignment signifies a relevant comparison. The primary goals often include enhancing productivity, ensuring user adoption, and minimizing resistance to change. These similarities highlight shared objectives and common benchmarks for success, which can guide the student in setting realistic expectations and performance measures.
Despite similarities, differences in results are expected due to variances in organizational size, culture, resource availability, and leadership commitment. For example, a project in a large, multinational corporation might face more complex stakeholder management and longer implementation cycles than a small startup. Additionally, organizational readiness for change, technological infrastructure, and staff training levels significantly influence outcomes. Such differences may lead to variations in project results, with some achieving quicker success in more agile environments or encountering unforeseen challenges in more bureaucratic settings. Anticipating these discrepancies enables students to develop tailored strategies for their projects, incorporating lessons learned from the literature but adapting to their unique organizational realities.
In conclusion, comparing a literature review project to a personal or organizational endeavor enriches understanding and strategic planning. It provides a basis for setting realistic goals, identifying potential pitfalls, and leveraging proven approaches. Recognizing both similarities and differences ensures that students can adapt best practices and anticipate challenges, thereby increasing the likelihood of project success.
References
- Kwak, Y. H., & Anbari, F. T. (2009). Analyzing project management research: Perspectives from top management and researchers. International Journal of Project Management, 65(4), 370-379.
- Shenhar, A. J., & Dvir, D. (2007). Reinventing project management: The diamond approach. Harvard Business Review Press.
- Kerzner, H. (2017). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
- PMI. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) — Sixth Edition. Project Management Institute.
- Meredith, J. R., & Mantel, S. J. (2014). Project management: A managerial approach. John Wiley & Sons.
- Lehmann, M., & Müller, R. (2013). Towards a comprehensive project success model: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 31(1), 41-55.
- Schwalbe, K. (2015). Information technology project management. Cengage Learning.
- Turner, J. R. (2014). Handbook of project-based management: Leading strategic change in organizations. McGraw-Hill Education.
- Cooke-Davies, T. (2004). The "real" success factors on projects. International Journal of Project Management, 22(8), 439-446.
- Harrison, F. (2018). Critical success factors in project management. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 11(1), 107-124.