Please Make Sure You Read The Literature Review Of Tech

Please Make Sure That You Read the Literature Review of Technology Ado

Please Make Sure That You Read the Literature Review Of Technology Ado

Please make sure that you read THE LITERATURE REVIEW OF TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION MODELS AND THEORIES FOR THE NOVELTY TECHNOLOGY before completing the assignment. A local community college has a problem with retention of students. The community college has done some preliminary research and found out that students feel disconnected and do not know what is going on with their course schedules, degree programs, and options. The community college’s board of directors has decided through the use of a consultant that a mobile phone application that runs on Apple and Android smartphones is the best strategy to help with the perceived feeling of being ‘disconnected’ by the students. You are in charge of coming up with a solution, essentially the application and making sure that this is going to be integrated with the school's information systems (none are specified, so make some assumptions) which is going to provide students with information.

Paper For Above instruction

This paper explores the development of a mobile application aimed at improving student retention at a community college by addressing feelings of disconnection and lack of information among students. It integrates a review of relevant technology adoption models to inform the design, implementation, and evaluation of the proposed system. The focus is on identifying key features, measuring success before implementation, and understanding stakeholder roles to ensure effective adoption and sustained use of the application.

Introduction

Student retention remains a significant challenge for many higher education institutions, including community colleges, which often serve diverse and non-traditional student populations. The primary concern highlighted by the college involves students feeling disconnected from their academic environment, leading to lower engagement and persistence. An innovative technological solution, specifically a mobile phone application accessible on both Apple and Android devices, has been proposed as a way to bridge the communication gap and foster stronger engagement. This solution aligns with the broader goal of utilizing technology adoption theories to guide its development and facilitate successful implementation.

Basic Features of the Mobile Application

The core features of the proposed mobile application should align with the goals of increased connectivity, timely information dissemination, and personalized academic support. Key features include:

• Personalized Dashboard: Displaying individualized course schedules, academic progress, and upcoming deadlines to keep students informed.
• Real-Time Notifications: Push alerts about class changes, grades, financial aid updates, and campus events to foster timely communication.
• Course and Degree Information: Easy access to program requirements, course descriptions, and registration options to facilitate academic planning.
• Campus Map and Directory: Facilitates navigation and contact information for faculty, staff, and student services.
• Messaging System: Secure communication channels with advisors, instructors, and peer groups to enhance engagement.
• Integration with Student Information Systems: Syncing with existing databases to provide real-time data updates and personalized content.

Additional features could include academic resources, campus news, and links to support services, all designed to foster a sense of community and support student success.

Measuring Potential Success of the Program

Before implementing the app, success metrics should be established to evaluate its effectiveness. These include both quantitative and qualitative measures:

• User Engagement Metrics: Tracking login frequency, feature utilization, and session duration to assess adoption levels.
• Retention Rates: Monitoring enrollment persistence over semesters to determine if the app positively impacts dropout rates.
• Student Satisfaction: Conducting surveys and focus groups to gather feedback on usability, usefulness, and overall satisfaction.
• Academic Performance: Analyzing GPA trends and course completion rates before and after implementation.
• Communication Efficiency: Measuring response times and the volume of interactions through the messaging feature.

These metrics will help identify areas for improvement and determine whether the technological intervention is meeting its objectives.

Stakeholders and Their Roles

Identifying and engaging key stakeholders is critical to the successful adoption of the mobile application. Stakeholders include students, faculty, administration, IT staff, and student support services.

• Students: Primary users whose feedback on usability and functionality will influence usability improvements and overall adoption.
• Faculty and Academic Advisors: Can integrate the app into their communication practices and provide feedback on content delivery and student engagement.
• Administrative Staff: Support data integration and system maintenance, ensuring the app aligns with institutional goals.
• IT Department: Responsible for technical implementation, security, and ongoing support.
• Student Support Services: Can leverage the app to disseminate resources and foster a supportive campus environment.

Engaging stakeholders through surveys, focus groups, and pilot testing will provide vital insights into user needs and acceptance levels. Their involvement ensures that the app is user-centered, relevant, and more likely to achieve widespread adoption.

Theoretical Frameworks for Technology Adoption

Several models can inform the development and implementation process of the mobile application. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), developed by Davis (1989), emphasizes perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use as primary determinants of user acceptance. Applying TAM, the app should be designed to demonstrate clear benefits in facilitating students’ academic and social needs while ensuring intuitive usability.

Another relevant model is the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), which expands on TAM by incorporating social influence and facilitating conditions (Venkatesh et al., 2003). Considering UTAUT would help address organizational and social factors influencing adoption among diverse student populations.

Furthermore, innovativeness and resistance to change are concepts described in Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovations theory (2003). Pilot programs and peer champions from early adopters can accelerate wider acceptance by demonstrating benefits and reducing uncertainties.

Conclusion

Designing and implementing a mobile application aimed at reducing student disconnection requires careful consideration of features, measurement strategies, stakeholder involvement, and theoretical foundations. Leveraging models such as TAM and UTAUT provides a structured framework to predict and enhance user acceptance. By continuously engaging stakeholders and monitoring success metrics, the college can foster a technology-driven environment conducive to student retention and success.

References

• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
• Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178.
• Lee, J., & Kozar, K. A. (2006). Influence of website characteristics, consumer perceptions, and purchase intentions: A replication of McKinney, Yoon, and Zahedi's (2002) study. Information & Management, 43(3), 352-367.
• Holden, R. J., & Karsh, B. T. (2010). The technology acceptance model: Its past and its future in health care. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 43(1), 159-172.
• Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351-370.
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
• Leidner, D., & Kayworth, T. (2006). Review: A review of culture in information systems research: Toward a theory of information technology culture conflict. MIS Quarterly, 30(2), 357-399.