Please Read The Case Of The Million Dollar Decision

Instructionsplease Read The Case Of The Million Dollar Decision That

Please read The Case of the Million Dollar Decision that can be found at the link below: Should the company pay bribes to enter the Chinese market? Why or why not? If the company should pay bribes, is this an example of cultural relativism? In other words, is the company simply doing something that Chinese society finds acceptable? Assume that you are a manager at Pegasus and the CEO asks you to manage the company's entry into the Chinese market. He also makes clear that you are expected to make the Chinese decision makers happy by providing them with sums of money. Using your ethical tools from the class, decide what would you do?

Paper For Above instruction

The ethical dilemma presented in the case of the Million Dollar Decision revolves around whether a company should engage in paying bribes to facilitate entry into the Chinese market. This scenario probes deep into questions of legality, morality, cultural relativism, and ethical decision-making within international business contexts. As a manager at Pegasus, tasked with managing entry into China, and under directives to satisfy local decision-makers financially, I am compelled to analyze this situation using established ethical frameworks to arrive at a morally sound decision.

At the heart of the dilemma is the question of legality versus ethical acceptability. Legally, most countries, including China, have laws against bribery, and international agreements like the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention explicitly prohibit these practices. Ethically, however, some argue that in certain cultural contexts, paying bribes is customary or regarded as a norm of doing business. This perspective is often termed cultural relativism, which suggests that moral standards are culturally dependent, and what might be unacceptable in one society could be acceptable in another.

From a normative ethical standpoint, various theories can guide decision-making. Deontological ethics emphasize following universal moral principles, such as honesty and integrity, which would oppose paying bribes regardless of local customs. Virtue ethics focus on moral character, urging individuals and organizations to act in ways that reflect virtues such as honesty and fairness. Consequently, paying bribes could erode an organization's integrity and tarnish its reputation globally.

On the other hand, consequentialist or utilitarian perspectives evaluate the outcomes of actions. If paying bribes results in more significant benefits—such as access to the Chinese market, economic growth, and respectful relationships—then the action might be justified from a utilitarian point. Nonetheless, this approach overlooks the broader implications of perpetuating corruption, undermining legal institutions, and fostering a culture of dishonesty.

Cultural relativism poses particular challenges in this case. While it might be tempting to accept local business practices as culturally appropriate, endorsing bribery as culturally acceptable can perpetuate corrupt behaviors and undermine universal ethical standards. Moreover, it risks damaging the company's reputation globally if such practices become publicly exposed. Ethical leadership entails resisting corrupt practices even when they might be customary locally; this stance fosters corporate integrity and aligns with international anti-corruption efforts.

Therefore, as a manager guided by ethical tools taught in class, I would advocate for not paying bribes. Instead, I would explore legal avenues to establish a legitimate presence in China, such as building strong relationships based on transparency and compliance with local laws. Engaging local government officials through official channels and leveraging cultural understanding can facilitate market entry without resorting to unethical practices.

Furthermore, the decision to refuse paying bribes should be communicated transparently and strategically to Chinese counterparts, emphasizing the company's commitment to ethical standards and long-term sustainability. Over time, this approach can improve the company's reputation and establish trust within local communities and authorities based on integrity rather than corrupt practices. Such a stance also aligns with corporate social responsibility principles, which advocate for conducting business ethically across borders.

In conclusion, although paying bribes might facilitate short-term market entry and satisfy local decision-makers, it fundamentally conflicts with ethical principles and international laws. Upholding integrity and complying with anti-bribery standards should be prioritized, fostering sustainable and reputable business practices. Integrating ethical reasoning with strategic business planning helps ensure that the company’s expansion into China upholds its values and global good standing, thereby contributing positively to international commerce and ethical globalization.

References

• Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. Harper.
• Donaldson, T. (1996). Values in tension: Ethics away from home. Harvard Business Review, 74(5), 46-58.
• Kaptein, M. (2008). Developing a measure of unethical behavior in the context of business and organizational ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(2), 187–204.
• Milton Friedman. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine.
• OECD. (1997). Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
• Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Cambridge University Press.
• Schneider, M. (2015). Business ethics and compliance: The key to sustainable growth. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 219-229.
• Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1993). Corruption. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 599-617.
• Valentine, S., & Fleischman, G. (2008). Ethics programs, perceived corporate misconduct, and external perceptions. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(2), 147-159.
• World Bank. (2017). Combating corruption: A fundamental challenge for global development. World Development Report.