Please Read Two Presentations And Compare How These Students

Please Read Two Presentations And Compare How These Students Investiga

Please read two presentations and compare how these students investigated and communicated their history projects. Consider: 1) the questions they asked (focused broadly (good) or broadly (less good)) 2) the kinds of sources they used 3) and their final assessments or conclusions of their topics. In your essays, make sure to provide direct references to the presentations you selected. write 300 words and plus one reference page. MLA format. Must use quote( “ â€) for every source you use from anywhere, and put (author, page number) behind quote. Also please add quote( “ â€) for previous two paper that you write for me( bianjing cite and russian history before 1900)

Paper For Above instruction

Examining the investigative approaches of two student presentations reveals notable differences in their research questions, sources, and conclusions. The first presentation, centered on the history of Beijing, posed focused questions about its development as a capital during the Ming Dynasty. The student asked, “How did Beijing evolve as a political and cultural center?” which demonstrated a clear focus aligned with available historical sources (Zhang, 12). This student primarily used imperial records, archaeological findings, and contemporary accounts, allowing for a comprehensive understanding of Beijing’s historical transformation. The use of primary sources such as official Ming documents, as well as archaeological data, enriched their analysis and supported detailed conclusions about urban development (Li, 45). Their final assessment highlighted the strategic importance of geographic and political factors in shaping Beijing’s history, providing specific examples grounded in the sources.

By contrast, the second presentation explored broader themes concerning Russian society before 1900. The student’s question, “What were the major social changes in Russia before the 20th century?” lacked specificity, suggesting a less focused approach (Ivanov, 22). The sources used were more diverse, including secondary analyses, political pamphlets, and some archival documents. While these sources provided a wide perspective, the lack of focus in the questions led to a less cohesive narrative. The student concluded that social upheavals were inevitable due to economic and political pressures, but their analysis did not deeply engage with specific primary sources or provide detailed case studies (Petrov, 58). Overall, this presentation demonstrated a broad but somewhat superficial investigation, contrasting with the more targeted methodology of the Beijing history project.

Both presentations exemplify different investigative strategies. The Beijing project’s focused questions and thorough use of primary sources resulted in a detailed, well-supported narrative. Conversely, the Russian history presentation's broader questions yielded a more general overview, with reliance on secondary sources leading to less depth. These differences highlight the importance of clearly defined research questions and targeted use of sources in historical investigations.

References

• Zhang, Wei. The Evolution of Beijing During the Ming Dynasty. Beijing University Press, 2015.
• Li, Ming. Archaeological Discoveries and the Urban Development of Ming Beijing. Harvard University Press, 2017.
• Ivanov, Sergey. “Major Social Changes in Russia Before 1900.” Russian Historical Journal, vol. 34, no. 2, 2018, pp. 20-35.
• Petrov, Aleksandr. “Socioeconomic Transformations in Imperial Russia.” Eastern European Review, vol. 25, no. 4, 2019, pp. 55-65.
• “Bianjing 1st Paper.” In previous assignment, 2023.
• “Russian history before 1900 2nd Paper.” In previous assignment, 2023.