Please See Attached Files Alsotouchstone 4 Informative Essay

Please See Attached Files Alsotouchstone 4 Informative Essay Revisio

Review the in-text comments and summary feedback you received on your Touchstone 3 draft to deepen and extend your analysis of your topic. Submit a revision of your Touchstone 3 draft that reflects the feedback. Include a copy of your Touchstone 3 draft below the “Think About Your Writing” questions for this unit.

All writers revise their work as part of the writing process. For Touchstone 4, submit a revised version of your Touchstone 3 essay. The process of revising involves “re-thinking” your essay. Your revision should reflect your attention to the following: rhetorical situation, focus, organization, flow, style, and clarity. As you consider possible revisions, evaluate how your essay can be improved in each of the areas above. Focus your attention on the areas that would benefit most from revision.

You can add, delete, or move text as you revise your essay. Note the following revision guidelines: Do not draft a new essay. You must revise your Touchstone 3 draft. Allow time between drafts so that you can see your original work from a new perspective. Revision is different from editing and proofreading; however, be sure to edit and proofread your revised essay before you submit it.

Revise your Touchstone 3 essay using the revision strategies you learned in Unit 4. This revision should reflect significant changes from your first draft, and should incorporate the feedback you received on Touchstone 3.

Think About Your Writing

1. How much time did you spend revising your draft? Which revision strategies did you use, and which of them worked best for you? (2-3 sentences)
2. How did the revision process improve your essay? (2-3 sentences)
3. What did you learn about your writing process or yourself as a writer? (2-3 sentences)

Revision Guidelines

Refer to the checklist below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until your essay meets all of the guidelines. Print this checklist!

• Have you significantly revised your essay, making adjustments in areas that include organization, focus, and clarity?
• Have you made comprehensive changes in word choice, sentence variety, and style?
• Have you made revisions that are based on the feedback provided by your evaluator?

Essay Prompt

Image Analysis — If you chose this prompt, have you revisited your analysis and interpretation of the image to ensure that you've done more than describe it? Have you revisited your conclusions about the audience and effectiveness of the ad? Did you include the image in your essay? Is your draft between three and five pages in length?

Extended Definition — If you chose this prompt, did you make sure that your definition is unique, and doesn’t rely too heavily on the traditional definition? Did you revisit your examples and explanations that support your definition? Is your essay between three and five pages in length?

Additionally, ensure your thesis clearly states the overall claim of the essay and is located in the introductory paragraph. Review your body paragraphs to ensure each has a clear topic sentence, and revisit your conclusion to strengthen your final statement. Improve transitions for better flow, maintain a clear focus, and include only relevant details. Confirm your tone is unbiased and informative, and your word choices are appropriate. Finally, check your grammar, spelling, punctuation, and formatting before submission.

Your essay should be three to five pages (approximately words) in length. Double-space the draft, using one-inch margins and an easy-to-read 12-point font. Your submission must include your revised essay, answers to the “Think About Your Writing” questions, and a copy of your original Touchstone 3 essay in a single .doc or .docx file. Name, course, date, and the assignment title should be at the top of your document.

Paper For Above instruction

In this revision process, I have carefully considered the feedback received on my initial Touchstone 3 draft to enhance my essay’s clarity, organization, and focus. The primary goal was to deepen my analysis while addressing the needs identified through evaluator comments, especially in explicating the image analysis and strengthening my arguments. The revision involved a comprehensive re-evaluation of my thesis, ensuring it clearly articulated the overall claim and was placed effectively in the introduction. Additionally, I expanded my evidence and explanations to support the central ideas, making sure they are relevant and compelling.

Time spent revising was approximately four days, employing strategies such as re-reading my draft with fresh perspectives, counting on peer feedback, and deliberately restructuring paragraphs to improve flow. One of the most effective strategies was critically analyzing each paragraph's topic sentence and ensuring it directly related to my thesis. I also incorporated more transitional phrases to connect ideas smoothly. Comparing my draft to the revised version, I noticed a marked improvement in coherence and readability. For instance, I removed redundant details and added clarifying sentences where my original arguments lacked clarity.

Reflecting on this process, I learned that revising is a dynamic and iterative phase that requires patience and critical thinking. I discovered the importance of stepping away from my work and returning with fresh eyes to identify vague or weak points. Moreover, I realized that feedback, whether from peers or instructors, is invaluable. It illuminated blind spots I might not have seen otherwise and pushed me to make meaningful revisions, especially in strengthening my thesis and transitions.

Overall, revising my essay fundamentally improved its quality by sharpening my analysis and making my ideas more accessible to readers. I was able to add relevant evidence, clarify complex points, and improve overall flow. The process highlighted the importance of thoughtful review and willingness to make significant changes, reaffirming that revision is essential for producing polished, effective writing.

References

• Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Pearson Education.
• Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2018). They Say / I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing (4th ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.
• Harris, R. (2010). Revising and editing your writing. In The College Writer: A Guide to Thinking, Writing, and Researching (4th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Kolln, M., & Gray, K. (2017). The Rhetorical Grammar: Writing Critically about Composition. Pearson.
• Lunsford, A. A., & Ruszkiewicz, J. J. (2016). Everything’s an Argument. Bedford/St. Martin’s.
• Street, B. V. (2003). Social literacies: Critical approaches to reading and writing. Routledge.
• Turabian, K. L. (2018). A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations. University of Chicago Press.
• Wallace, M. (2009). Study Skills for Success. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Wilhoit, S., & Dively, L. M. (2014). Developing Critical Thinkers Through Writing. Pearson Higher Ed.
• Zinsser, W. (2009). On Writing Well: The Classic Guide to Writing Nonfiction. HarperCollins.