Please Select A Few Sport-Related Topics You Would Be 844612
Please Select A Few Sport Related Topics You Would Be Interesting In S
Please select a few sport-related topics you would be interested in studying, and using the four worldviews and possible research methods, discuss a project that you could complete for a research project. The focus of your project should be on sport-related long-term injuries in American football, especially CTE. The following questions should be answered to successfully complete this assignment: please identify which of the four worldviews (postpositivist, social constructivist, advocacy/participatory, or pragmatic) presented best aligns with your topic or topics of interest. Also, please explain why you think the worldview and topic fit together so nicely. Please identify whether this would be a quantitative (analyzed statistically), qualitative (written results of personal interviews, for example), or mixed methods (combination of both) research project. Provide a few key words you would use to search for resources to complete your review of literature. Provide two (2) examples where you would perform your literature search (types of journals you would use, databases, etc.). You can use the following questions as guides: What would you like to learn about this topic? Which worldview will you bring to the study? What are some implications of this worldview for your study? Which of the three types of design will you use and why? Which strategy of inquiry will you use and why? What are key words for your review of literature and where will you search? The minimum word count is 950 words, not including the reference page. Include at least 3 scholarly sources in APA format. No plagiarism or grammatical errors. The assignment is due by 11/10/18 at 10 AM NY EST.
Paper For Above instruction
The exploration of sport-related long-term injuries, particularly chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) in American football, offers a multifaceted field for research that intersects health sciences, sports management, psychology, and societal impacts. The selection of an appropriate worldview, research method, and inquiry strategy is essential to framing a comprehensive study that can contribute meaningful insights into this critical sports health issue.
Alignment of Worldview with Research Topic
The worldview that aligns most suitably with the study of CTE in American football is the postpositivist paradigm. This worldview emphasizes empirical evidence, objectivity, and the scientific method, making it fitting for investigating the biological and neurological aspects of CTE. Given the biological underpinnings of CTE, which involve measurable brain changes and neurodegeneration, postpositivism provides a framework for quantitative research that can assess the incidence, severity, and correlates of CTE through statistical analysis.
In contrast, social constructivism centers on understanding human experiences and social realities, which could be utilized in exploring players’ perceptions or cultural attitudes towards injuries. However, for the specific investigation of brain pathology and injury prevalence, the postpositivist approach offers a more direct and measurable pathway. Pragmatism could also be relevant if the study aims to combine quantitative and qualitative methods for practical outcomes, but for the biological focus, postpositivism remains most aligned.
Research Methodology
The research project would primarily adopt a quantitative methodology, analyzing data collected from medical imaging, brain donations, and neuropsychological assessments. Quantitative methods enable statistical analysis of injury prevalence among American football players and can establish correlations between playing career characteristics and long-term brain health outcomes.
However, a mixed-method approach could also be employed, integrating quantitative data with qualitative interviews with former players, coaches, or medical professionals to contextualize the findings and explore personal experiences. Nonetheless, given the scientific nature of CTE diagnosis and progression, the quantitative approach offers clarity and objectivity for measuring injury outcomes.
Keywords and Literature Search Strategies
Key terms for resource searches include "CTE in American football," "long-term brain injuries," "concussion effects in football," "sports neurotrauma," "brain neuroimaging," "chronic traumatic encephalopathy," and "sports-related neurodegeneration." These keywords facilitate targeted searches across academic and medical databases.
Two examples of literature search strategies encompass:
- Searching in PubMed using keywords like "CTE" and "football-related neurotrauma," focusing on peer-reviewed journal articles from neurology and sports medicine journals such as Journal of Neurotrauma and Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise.
- Exploring databases like PsycINFO and SPORTDiscus using terms like "long-term sports injuries" and "player health outcomes" to gather interdisciplinary perspectives, including psychological and sports management insights.
Research Design and Strategy of Inquiry
The preferred research design is a correlational studies approach, aiming to quantify relationships between variables such as exposure duration, position played, and severity of neurodegenerative changes. This design allows for statistical analysis of injury prevalence and risk factors.
The inquiry strategy would be primarily a quantitative strategy, utilizing epidemiological data, neuroimaging results, and neuropsychological test scores. This approach facilitates an objective understanding of injury patterns and risk factors, essential for informing injury prevention and policy development in sports.
Conclusion
The study of CTE in American football through a postpositivist lens, employing quantitative methods and correlational research design, offers a scientifically rigorous approach to understanding the long-term impacts of sport-related neurotrauma. By carefully selecting key search terms and leveraging targeted databases, researchers can assemble a robust body of literature that elucidates injury mechanisms, prevalence rates, and potential preventive strategies, ultimately contributing to safer sports practices and health outcomes for athletes.
References
- Journal of Neurotrauma, 35(8), 691-701.