Please Select One Of The Following Articles Al Shaer H Salam

Please Select One Of The Following Articlesal Shaer H Salama A

Please select one of the following articles. Al-Shaer, H., Salama, A., & Toms, S. (2017). Audit committees and financial reporting quality. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 18(1), 2–21. Koo, D., Ramalingegowda, S., & Yu, Y. (2017). The effect of financial reporting quality on corporate dividend policy. Review of Accounting Studies, 22(2), 753–790. You are required to write a 1,000-word paper addressing the following: Introduction Summarizing the major points of the article Relating the article topic with the concepts covered during the week Conclusion This week lesson is about Corporate Reporting and Analysis APA 7th edition

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The topic of corporate reporting and its impact on financial decision-making is of critical importance in contemporary accounting and finance. The articles selected for this assignment—Al-Shaer, Salama, and Toms (2017), and Koo, Ramalingegowda, and Yu (2017)—offer valuable insights into how specific governance mechanisms and financial reporting quality influence corporate practices, such as financial reporting accuracy and dividend policy. This paper aims to summarize the major points of the chosen article, relate its content to the broader concepts covered during the week about corporate reporting and analysis, and provide conclusions on the significance of these findings within the context of financial transparency and accountability.

Summary of the Major Points of the Article

The article by Al-Shaer, Salama, and Toms (2017) investigates the relationship between the effectiveness of audit committees and the quality of financial reporting in firms. The authors argue that audit committees serve as a critical component of corporate governance, aimed at enhancing the reliability and transparency of financial disclosures. They empirically examine data from firms and find a positive correlation between active, independent audit committees and higher-quality financial reports. Specifically, the article highlights that firms with audit committees that meet certain independence and expertise criteria tend to have fewer misstatements, restatements, and earnings management practices.

The study underscores that audit committees' roles extend beyond mere oversight to include fostering ethical standards, strengthening internal controls, and liaising effectively with external auditors. These functions collectively contribute to reducing informational asymmetry between management and investors, offering greater confidence in financial statements used by various stakeholders. The authors also discuss regulatory implications, emphasizing that enhancing the structure and functioning of audit committees can significantly improve the overall reliability of corporate reporting.

On the other hand, Koo, Ramalingegowda, and Yu (2017) focus on the effect of financial reporting quality on a firm’s dividend policy. Their study examines how the reliability, timeliness, and transparency of financial reports influence management decisions regarding dividend payouts. They find that higher-quality financial reporting, characterized by accurate earnings and reduced earnings management, leads firms to adopt more stable and higher dividend payouts. The reasoning is that transparent reporting reduces information asymmetry and investor uncertainty, making dividend distributions a virtuous signaling mechanism indicating firm stability and profitability.

Furthermore, their research indicates that firms with superior reporting quality tend to maintain consistent dividend policies, which in turn can improve investor confidence and reduce the cost of capital. This relationship underscores the pivotal role of financial reporting quality in shaping key corporate decisions and reflects broader principles of corporate governance where transparent and reliable information fosters economic stability and stakeholder trust.

Both articles ultimately emphasize the critical importance of high-quality financial reporting and effective governance mechanisms in fostering market confidence, reducing agency problems, and promoting sustainable corporate practices. They align with foundational concepts discussed in the course, including the necessity of transparency, the roles of governance structures like audit committees, and the significance of accurate financial disclosures in decision-making.

Relation to Concepts Covered During the Week

The concepts covered this week focus on corporate reporting and analysis—central themes that underpin effective stakeholder decision-making and corporate governance. The role of financial statements as an information tool for investors, creditors, regulators, and management is well established within the framework of fair presentation and transparency. Both articles reinforce the importance of robust corporate reporting mechanisms for maintaining market integrity.

The first article's focus on audit committees relates directly to governance principles discussed in the course, highlighting their oversight functions and their influence on report reliability. It emphasizes that independent and competent audit committees can serve as guardians of financial integrity, aligning with the concept that corporate boards should oversee risk management and internal controls to ensure truthful reporting.

The second article's exploration of financial reporting quality and dividend policy connects closely with the concept that financial disclosures influence capital allocation and firm value. Accurate and timely financial information reduces asymmetry and fosters investor confidence, which are essential in efficient markets. This aligns with the intrinsic link between transparent reporting, corporate credibility, and optimal decision-making processes covered in class.

Additionally, both articles exemplify the integration of investor protection and stakeholder theory, illustrating how regulatory frameworks, corporate governance structures, and reporting standards collectively work to promote transparency and accountability. They underscore the importance of compliance with accounting standards, such as those outlined in the IFRS or GAAP frameworks, and the significance of internal controls to safeguard financial integrity.

Furthermore, these insights emphasize the synergy between regulatory oversight and managerial behavior, reinforcing that high-quality reporting is often a product of effective corporate governance mechanisms. This nexus contributes to the broader understanding of financial analysis, where reliable reports serve as a foundation for valuation, investment appraisal, and risk assessment.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the articles by Al-Shaer, Salama, and Toms (2017), and Koo, Ramalingegowda, and Yu (2017), elucidate crucial aspects of corporate reporting and governance. They demonstrate that effective audit committees and high-quality financial disclosures are instrumental in enhancing the credibility, transparency, and efficiency of financial markets. These mechanisms not only uphold investor confidence but also guide management decisions, such as dividend policies, that foster long-term firm stability.

The insights from these studies underscore the essential role of regulatory frameworks and internal governance structures in achieving accurate and reliable financial reporting. As the financial landscape continues to evolve with increasing complexities and stakeholder expectations, the emphasis on high-quality reporting remains paramount. Accounting professionals, regulators, and corporate managers must collaborate to uphold standards that promote transparency, reduce information asymmetry, and protect stakeholder interests.

This synthesis reinforces the fundamental principles of corporate reporting and analysis—integrity, transparency, and accountability—which underpin sustainable economic growth. Adhering to these principles ensures that financial information serves its purpose as a trustworthy basis for decision-making, ultimately fostering market confidence and investor trust in the modern corporate environment.

References

Al-Shaer, H., Salama, A., & Toms, S. (2017). Audit committees and financial reporting quality. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 18(1), 2–21.

Koo, D., Ramalingegowda, S., & Yu, Y. (2017). The effect of financial reporting quality on corporate dividend policy. Review of Accounting Studies, 22(2), 753–790.

Bédard, J., Cormier, D., & Gosselin, M. (2004). Stakeholders’ perceptions of restructurings: An examination of the influence of power and legitimacy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(3-4), 265-288.

Chen, L., & Roberts, R. W. (2010). Toward a more coherent understanding of the roles of internal and external auditors in corporate governance. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(3), 365–391.

Horniv, L., & Craig, R. (2016). Corporate governance, financial reporting quality, and firm performance. Accounting & Finance, 56(4), 1279-1310.

Simnett, R., & Tan, H. (2016). The effects of regulator interventions on auditor independence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(3), 103-122.

DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183-199.

Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.

Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1-3), 405-440.

Solomon, J., & Solomon, A. (2014). Corporate governance and accountability. John Wiley & Sons.