Please Use APA Format For Each Question: 1-2 Paragraphs Per

Please Use Apa Format For Each Question 1 2 Paragraph Per Question

Please Use APA Format For Each Question. 1-2 Paragraph Per Question.

---

Question 1: Examine the manner in which investment banks previously used leverage to multiply profits and thus endangered the entire global financial system. Determine the role that the 1999 elimination of the Glass-Steagall Act played in the endangerment of the global financial system.

Investment banks historically employed leverage as a strategy to amplify their profits by borrowing capital to finance large-scale investments. This practice, while profitable under stable conditions, significantly increased financial system risk when market conditions turned volatile. The elimination of the Glass-Steagall Act in 1999 by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act removed regulatory barriers between commercial banking, investment banking, and insurance companies (Calomiris & Mason, 2003). This deregulation facilitated the creation of financial conglomerates that engaged in riskier activities, including high leverage, without sufficient regulatory oversight. Consequently, these institutions accumulated substantial risk, amplifying the potential for systemic failures that could threaten the stability of the global financial system, as evidenced during the 2007–2008 financial crisis (Brunnermeier, 2009).

The removal of Glass-Steagall is often viewed as a pivotal moment that contributed to the financial crisis, as it allowed interconnected financial entities to operate with extensive leverage and complex derivatives. These practices obscured the true risk exposure of financial institutions, exacerbating systemic vulnerabilities (Chernenko & Sunderam, 2012). The combined effects of deregulation and high leverage created a fragile financial environment where the failure of a major institution could cascade throughout international markets, ultimately endangering global economic stability.

Question 2: Discuss the role of Special Purpose Entities (SPEs) in the fall of Enron. Examine the method in which Enron used SPEs to hide its liabilities.

Special Purpose Entities (SPEs) played a central role in Enron’s collapse by serving as corporate vehicles to transfer problematic liabilities off Enron’s balance sheet, thereby concealing financial instability from investors and regulators (Healy & Palepu, 2003). Enron established numerous SPEs to move debt and underperforming assets, creating the illusion of profitability and financial health. These entities were often used to inflate earnings by shifting liabilities and generating "phantom" profits, which misrepresented the company's true financial state (Benston, 2006).

Enron exploited the accounting flexibility surrounding SPEs through complex transactions that blurred ownership and risk. By structuring transactions with these entities, Enron effectively hid billions in liabilities, manipulating its financial statements. This deceptive practice misled stakeholders about the company's actual financial position, delaying recognition of losses and creating an illusion of growth that ultimately collapsed when the truth emerged (Healy & Palepu, 2003). The use of SPEs became a critical factor in the Enron scandal, exemplifying how accounting manipulation can distort financial realities and lead to corporate failure.

Question 3: Determine the key reasons why accountants, investors, and creditors found it challenging to determine the real assets and liabilities of the company.

Accountants, investors, and creditors faced significant difficulties in assessing the true assets and liabilities of Enron due to the company's aggressive accounting strategies and complex financial structures. The widespread use of off-balance-sheet entities, such as SPEs, created a convoluted picture of Enron’s finances, making it difficult to distinguish legitimate assets from manipulated or hidden liabilities (Scott, 2003). This opacity was compounded by the company's reliance on mark-to-market accounting, which allowed Enron to record projected future profits as current income, thus inflating asset values and obscuring real financial performance (Healy & Palepu, 2003).

Moreover, the lack of stringent regulatory oversight and inadequate corporate governance enabled Enron executives to exploit accounting loopholes and manipulate financial statements without immediate detection (Davis, 2005). These practices contributed to a distorted perception of Enron’s financial health, making it challenging for external stakeholders to ascertain the company’s true economic condition. As a result, erroneous valuation, misguided investment decisions, and delayed recognition of financial distress ensued, culminating in a loss of stakeholder confidence and the company's eventual collapse (Scott, 2003).

References

- Benston, G. J. (2006). Enron: An examination of the corporate fraud and accounting scandal. Accounting Horizons, 20(2), 137-147.

- Brunnermeier, M. K. (2009). Deciphering the liquidity and credit crunch 2007–2008. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(1), 77-100.

- Calomiris, C. W., & Mason, J. R. (2003). Contagion and bank Zhongre within the US financial system. The Journal of Financial Services Research, 24(2), 183-209.

- Chernenko, S., & Sunderam, A. (2012). The effect of trading activity on systemic risk: Evidence from the implementation of the Volcker Rule. The Journal of Finance, 67(5), 1915-1950.

- Davi, E. (2005). The influence of corporate governance on financial misconduct. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(3), 221-244.

- Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2003). The fall of Enron. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(2), 3-26.

- Scott, H. (2003). Enron: A case of fraud. The CPA Journal, 73(10), 18-23.

- Jones, T. M. (2011). Institutional ethics and corporate scandals: The Enron case. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(3), 371-388.

- Macey, J. R., & Sale, H. (2003). The greed and the corruption: Enron and beyond. Harvard Business Review, 81(4), 620-629.

- Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2003). The fall of Enron. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(2), 3-26.