Pmmm And Sappetrotrintotal 100 Distinguished Provides A Full
Pmmm And Sappetrotrintotal 100distinguished Provides A Fully Deve
PMMM and SAP/Petrotrin Total: 1.00 Distinguished - Provides a fully developed and expertly crafted discussion of how PMMM has brought success to each organization’s overall enterprise. The student uses current financial, operational, and strategic news to support the article details for either SAP or Petrotrin to describe the recent results. Proficient - Provides an adequate discussion of how PMMM has brought success to each organization’s overall enterprise. The student uses current financial, operational, and strategic news to support the article details for either SAP or Petrotrin to describe the recent results; however, some relevant details and ideas are not fully developed. Basic - Provides a discussion of how PMMM has brought success to each organization’s overall enterprise. The student uses most of the following in the discussion: current financial, operational, and strategic news to support the article details for either SAP or Petrotrin to describe the recent results. Relevant information related to PMMM is missing from the discussion. Below Expectations - Attempts to provide a discussion of how PMMM has brought success to each organization’s overall enterprise. The student uses a few of the following in their discussion: current financial, operational, and strategic news to support the article details for either SAP or Petrotrin to describe their recent results. Non-Performance - The discussion of how PMMM has brought success to organizations and the description of SAP/Petrotrin results is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Continuing to Improve Maturity Levels and Focus on PM Total: 2.00 Distinguished - Provides a thorough explanation about how the organizations are continuing to improve their project management maturity levels and their level of successful Project Management focus. Expertly applies appropriate concepts as outlined in the text, while demonstrating a thorough understanding of PMMM. Proficient - Provides an explanation about how the organizations are continuing to improve their project management maturity levels and their level of successful Project Management focus. Appropriate concepts from the text are provided, but relevant details are missing. Basic - Gives a brief explanation about how the organizations are continuing to improve their project management maturity levels and their level of successful Project Management focus. Does not identify specific concepts from the text. Below Expectations - Gives a brief explanation about how the organizations are continuing to improve their project management maturity levels and their level of successful Project Management focus. Fails to show an adequate understanding of the concepts from the text. Non-Performance - The explanation about how the organizations are continuing to improve their project management maturity levels and their level of successful Project Management focus is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Validation of Beliefs Total: 1.00 Distinguished - Validation of beliefs is clearly articulated and supported with abundant details relevant to PMMM. Proficient - Validation of beliefs is articulated and somewhat supported with details relevant to PMMM. Basic - Validation of beliefs is identified, but few specific supporting details relevant to PMMM are provided. Below Expectations - Validation of beliefs lacks clarity and focus and provides no specific supporting details relevant to PMMM. Non-Performance - The validation of beliefs is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Critical Thinking: Explanation of Issues Total: 0.20 Distinguished - Clearly and comprehensively explains in detail the issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding. Proficient - Clearly explains in detail the issue to be considered, delivering enough relevant information for an adequate understanding. Basic - Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, delivering minimal information for a basic understanding. Below Expectations - Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, but may not deliver additional information necessary for a basic understanding. Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics Total: 0.20 Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easy to understand. Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy to understand. Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may slightly distract the reader. Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension or syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors, which distract the reader. Non-Performance - The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
APA Formatting Total: 0.20 Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title and reference page. Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper, however, layout contains a few minor errors. Basic - Exhibits basic knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. Layout does not meet all APA requirements. Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA. Non-Performance - The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Total: 0.20 Distinguished - The paper meets the specific page requirement stipulated in the assignment description. Proficient - The paper closely meets the page requirements predetermined in the assignment description. Basic - The paper meets over half of the page requirement. Below Expectations - A fraction of the page requirement is completed. Non-Performance - The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Resource Requirement Total: 0.20 Distinguished - Provides ample resources and uses the correct amount of sources from the specified search agent. Proficient - Provides the approximate number of sources, while using some of the correct search agents specified in the assignment instructions. Basic - Provides over half of the sources required in the assignment instructions. Below Expectations - Barely provides adequate resources and unable to include sources from specified search agent. Non-Performance - The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Research Methods The project is to involve an investigation of a current issue, trend, problem, or opportunity for a department, company, or industry. It will entail extensive research of published sources (secondary information) and may include gathering primary data as well. Primary data could be gathered through focus groups, in-depth interviews, or a telephone or mail survey, however, this may present two major challenges. First, the student must become thoroughly knowledgeable in the use of the method through independent study. Second, desired survey respondents may not be available. Design of a primary research study must be approved by the faculty member before class begins. This includes sample selection, questionnaire design, and methods of analysis. Certain projects may require students to assess the marketing or business strategies of real-world organizations. Because companies generally hold such strategic information confidential, students should be challenged to use secondary research and analytical reasoning to draw conclusions about strategic direction. Only public information will be readily available to students, and they should learn to derive meaning from that information. If your proposed project will contain content from a paper that was written for another class, it must involve extensive additional research or it will be considered plagiarism. Plagiarism is grounds for dismissal from the University. Written Report Below is a brief outline of the report. APA style, 6th edition, is to be used. 1. Title Page 2. Abstract or Executive Summary 3. Body of the Paper ï‚· Introduction ï‚· Literature Review ï‚· (If primary research is conducted) Method Used to Gather Information Results ï‚· Conclusions or Recommendations 4. References 5. Appendices ï‚· Copy of presentation software presentation slides (preferably 6 slides per page) Oral Presentation Students deliver an oral presentation of their findings during the final session of the course using presentation software slides. A copy of the presentation (preferably 6 slides per page) are to be included in the appendices of the written report. Evaluation of the Project The written report and oral presentation are evaluated based on the attributes below. Students should use this as a checklist for self-evaluation. Assessment of Written Assignments A Paper (Exemplary): 1. Complies fully with the assignment. Information clearly and effectively supports a central purpose or thesis and displays a thoughtful, in-depth analysis of a sufficiently limited topic. The reader gains insights. 2. Is directed towards and meets the needs of a defined audience (is persuasive or argumentative). 3. Begins, flows, and ends effectively. The introduction, body and conclusion of the paper are sound. 4. Provides compelling supporting arguments, evidence, examples and details. The use of supporting detail is embedded in a context of discussion. 5. Is well-organized and unified with ideas and sentences that relate to the main topic. The ideas are arranged logically to support the thesis. 6. Uses appropriate, direct language: the writing is compelling; the sentences are well-phrased and varied in length and structure. Paragraphs are well-structured, use of headings is excellent, and the paper shows strong organization. 7. Correctly acknowledges and documents sources in APA style (e.g., in-text citations, works cited pages, etc.). 8. Is free of errors in grammar, punctuation, word choice, spelling, and format. 9. Maintains a level of excellence throughout, and shows originality and creativity.
Paper For Above instruction
The assignment requires a comprehensive investigation and analysis of how the Project Management Maturity Model (PMMM) has contributed to the success of specific organizations, focusing on either SAP or Petrotrin. The paper should utilize current financial, operational, and strategic data to illustrate recent results, demonstrating a thorough understanding of the organization's development in project management maturity. Furthermore, it should explore how these organizations are enhancing their project management maturity levels, applying relevant concepts from the literature on project management maturity. Additionally, validation of the beliefs surrounding PMMM's effectiveness must be clearly articulated, supported by detailed evidence relevant to the model. Critical issues related to project management within the organization should be comprehensively explained to ensure full understanding.
The paper must include a discussion of how the chosen organization—either SAP or Petrotrin—has implemented PMMM principles to achieve success, with current data supporting these claims. It should also examine ongoing improvements and strategies to elevate project management maturity levels, referencing appropriate academic concepts. Validation of beliefs about the model’s effectiveness must be thoroughly presented with concrete evidence. The discussion should demonstrate critical thinking by thoroughly explaining core issues, challenges, or opportunities faced by the organization regarding project management.
In addition, the report must be well-structured, adhering to APA 6th edition formatting, including a title page, abstract, body sections (introduction, literature review, methods, results, conclusions), references, and appendices with presentation slides. Sources should be credible, recent, and properly cited. The writing should be clear, concise, and free of grammatical or mechanical errors. The overall aim is to produce an insightful, analytical, and well-supported report that evaluates the impact of project management maturity and strategies for continuous improvement within the selected organization.