Points 200 Assignment 4: Employment Law Case Brief Criteria ✓ Solved
Points 200assignment 4 Employment Law Case Briefcriteriaunacceptable
Points 200 assignment 4 Employment Law Case Brief criteria unacceptable Below 70% F Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80-89% B Exemplary 90-100% A 1. Summarize the issue of the case, and then explain the employment law that was violated. Weight: 15% Did not submit or incompletely summarized the issue of the case, and then explain the employment law that was violated. Partially summarized the issue of the case, and then explain the employment law that was violated. Satisfactorily summarized the issue of the case, and then explain the employment law that was violated. Thoroughly summarized the issue of the case, and then explain the employment law that was violated. 2. Evaluate the type of impact the violation had on the organization then determine two (2) ways the organization could mitigate the issue. Justify your response. Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely evaluated the type of impact the violation had on the organization then did not submit or incompletely determined two (2) ways the organization could mitigate the issue. Did not submit or incompletely justified your response. Partially evaluated the type of impact the violation had on the organization then partially determined two (2) ways the organization could mitigate the issue. Partially justified your response. Satisfactorily evaluated the type of impact the violation had on the organization then satisfactorily determined two (2) ways the organization could mitigate the issue. Satisfactorily justified your response. Thoroughly evaluated the type of impact the violation had on the organization then thoroughly determined two (2) ways the organization could mitigate the issue. Thoroughly justified your response. 3. Based on your research, determine if a policy was or was not in place during the violation. Then, recommend a communication for all employees to enhance the knowledge of the policy. Support your response. Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely determined if a policy was or was not in place during the violation, based on your research. Then, did not submit or incompletely recommended a communication for all employees to enhance the knowledge of the policy. Did not submit or incompletely supported your response. Partially determined if a policy was or was not in place during the violation, based on your research. Then, partially recommended a communication for all employees to enhance the knowledge of the policy. Partially supported your response. Satisfactorily determined if a policy was or was not in place during the violation, based on your research. Then, satisfactorily recommended a communication for all employees to enhance the knowledge of the policy. Satisfactorily supported your response. Thoroughly determined if a policy was or was not in place during the violation, based on your research. Then, thoroughly recommended a communication for all employees to enhance the knowledge of the policy. Thoroughly supported your response. 4. As a HR Manager, explore an organization you worked for or familiar with, then suggest three (3) ways you could make the organization violation free from employment law issues. Justify your response. Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely explored an organization you worked for or familiar with as an HR manager, then did not submit or incompletely suggested three (3) ways you could make the organization violation free from employment law issues. Did not submit or incompletely justified your response. Partially explored an organization you worked for or familiar with as an HR manager, then partially suggested three (3) ways you could make the organization violation free from employment law issues. Partially justified your response. Satisfactorily explored an organization you worked for or familiar with as an HR manager, then satisfactorily suggested three (3) ways you could make the organization violation free from employment law issues. Satisfactorily justified your response. Thoroughly explored an organization you worked for or familiar with as an HR manager, then thoroughly suggested three (3) ways you could make the organization violation free from employment law issues. Thoroughly justified your response. 5. 3 references Weight: 5% No references provided. Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. 6. Writing Mechanics, Grammar, and Formatting Weight: 5% Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. Error free or almost error free grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. 7. Appropriate use of APA in-text citations and reference Weight: 5% Lack of in-text citations and / or lack of reference section. In-text citations and references are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in APA style. Most in-text citations and references are provided, and they are generally formatted correctly in APA style. In-text citations and references are error free or almost error free and consistently formatted correctly in APA style. 8. Information Literacy / Integration of Sources Weight: 5% Serious errors in the integration of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism, or failure to use in-text citations. Sources are partially integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing. Sources are mostly integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing. Sources are consistently integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing. 9. Clarity and Coherence of Writing Weight: 5% Information is confusing to the reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. Information is mostly clear and generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. Information is provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. MMIS 671: Fundamentals of Analytics and Business Intelligence Final Exam, Fall 2018 Due by 9 am on Tuesday, December 4, 2018 Maximum Score: 35 Points. Name: ________________________________________ · Please answer the questions and submit a single consolidated document by the due date. · Late penalty 20 points · You may use any reference material, but there should be no collaboration or consultations. · Penalty for any collaboration 30 points · The last 4 pages specify the format for presenting your solutions. · Please let me know in class on November 27 if you need any clarifications. Problem 1. Optimization Models [10 Points] A company produces and sells two types of coolants (C1 and C2) by mixing three grades of solvents (A, B, and C) in different proportions. Minimum percentages of grade A solvent and maximum percentages of grade C solvent allowed for each type of coolant are specified. The company has to produce at least a specified minimum quantity of each type of coolant. The table below presents these requirements, along with the selling price of each type of coolant. Minimum percent of grade A allowed Maximum percent of grade C allowed Minimum Quantity Required (gallons) Selling price per gallon C% 30% 100,000 $4 C% 60% 100,000 $3 Availability of the three grades of solvents and their costs are as follows: Grade A B C Maximum quantity available per day (gallons) 60,000 Cost per gallon $3 $2 $1 The company wants to maximize profits subject to the specified constraints. Formulate the problem as a linear program, find the optimal solution, and answer the following questions: a. What is the maximum profit attainable? [3 Points] b. How many gallons of each solvent are used to produce each type of coolant under the optimal solution? [3 points] c. At most how much should the company be willing to pay for one additional gallon of grade A solvent (beyond its current availability of 60,000 gallons)? [4 points] Problem 2. Linear Regression [10 Points] The data file “trainFinal.csv†contains observations on 12 variables: class, x1, x2, ..., x10, y Run a regression to predict the output variable y based on the 10 input variables x1, x2, …, x10. (a) [5 Points] Interpret the regression results to complete the table below. Specify the coefficient estimates (rounded to 2 decimal places) under the column “Coefficient Estimateâ€. Specify whether the coefficient estimates are significant (Yes or No) at the 0.1% level under the column “Significant†Coefficient Estimate Significant? Intercept x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 (b) [5 Points] Predict the expected value of y for the 10 examples in the data file “newFinal.csv†and report the predicted values (rounded to 1 decimal place) in the table below. x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 y 0....................................................................................................34 Problem 3. Classification Tree Inductive Learning [10 Points] Train a decision tree classifier using the observations from the data file “trainFinal.csv†to classify the output binary variable “class†based on the 10 input variables: x1, x2, ..., x10. (a) [4 Points] Specify the rules obtained in the form: IF