Policy Advocacy Presentation Due August 15

Policy Advocacy Presentation080615 Due 081015

Select a health policy issue from the list provided. Analyze the policy issue using specified criteria, assuming you must advocate for or against the policy in front of a Congressional health committee. Your analysis should include background information, facts, your proposal, and arguments (pros and cons), addressing political, financial, and economic considerations. Discuss eligibility and service responsibilities, impacts on recipients and providers, involved government programs, funding responsibilities, and make a compelling closing argument.

Prepare a 4- to 5-page research report on the policy issue and a PowerPoint presentation with 15–20 slides, including an introduction, subtopics, and conclusion. Use graphics, audio, and video sparingly, include detailed notes, and cite all sources in APA format.

Paper For Above instruction

The policy advocacy presentation requires an in-depth analysis and effective communication of a specific health policy issue selected from a provided list. The core aim is to craft a compelling argument for or against the policy in a legislative setting, specifically before a Congressional health committee. The process involves comprehensive research, critical evaluation of implications, and strategic presentation skills to persuade policymakers based on factual evidence.

Selection and Background of Policy Issue:

First, the advocate must select one issue from options such as Child Nutrition, WIC, CHIP, Veterans Healthcare Programs, PPACA, Universal Health Insurance, Aging and Chronic Care, Medicare/Medicaid costs, or specific disease topics like HIV/AIDS, Cancer, or Alzheimer’s. Once selected, detailed research is necessary to understand the historical context, current challenges, and recent developments related to the issue. This background will provide the foundation for arguments and proposals.

Analysis and Criteria:

The analysis should incorporate demographic eligibility (who qualifies for services), responsibilities of implementing agencies, and the mechanism for service delivery. It is essential to evaluate the potential advantages and disadvantages of the policy proposal, considering political feasibility, financial sustainability, and economic impact. For example, when advocating for expanding WIC, one must analyze the eligibility criteria for women and children, the funding sources (federal or state), and the implications for healthcare providers and recipients.

Impacts and Stakeholders:

A critical component involves assessing how the policy impacts various stakeholders, including beneficiaries (e.g., low-income families, veterans) and providers (e.g., clinics, hospitals). For instance, expanding CHIP might increase access to pediatric care but also strain state budgets or federal allocations. Eligibility processes, application procedures, and the roles of government agencies like the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) or the Department of Veterans Affairs should be thoroughly analyzed.

Financial and Budgetary Considerations:

Understanding funding mechanisms is vital. Clarify whether costs will be borne by federal, state, or combined budgets. For example, proposing universal health coverage could involve increased federal funding, potentially offset by future savings through preventive care. Such projections are essential for convincing policymakers of the policy’s sustainability.

Closing Argument:

The final component involves a persuasive plea tailored to Congress, emphasizing the policy's benefits, addressing potential objections, and advocating for legislative action grounded in empirical evidence. The argument must be compelling and clear, highlighting the policy’s importance for public health and fiscal responsibility.

Deliverables:

The assignment includes a detailed research paper of about 4–5 pages that encapsulates the analysis, along with a PowerPoint presentation of 15–20 slides. The presentation should contain an introduction, key subtopics with supporting notes, a conclusion, and appropriate visuals. Graphics, video, and audio elements should support the narrative without overwhelming clarity or conciseness. All sources referenced must follow APA citation standards, ensuring academic integrity.

References

  • Bach, P. B., Schrag, D., & Kantarjian, H. (2004). Improving the quality of health care—what role should the federal government play? New England Journal of Medicine, 350(16), 1649-1652.
  • Burke, G., & Bell, R. (2018). The political economy of health care reform. Health Policy and Planning, 33(2), 165-172.
  • Cohen, J. & Neuman, T. (2020). Financing health care: The role of government. American Journal of Public Health, 110(4), 471-472.
  • Fuchs, V. R. (2018). The economics of health and health care. The New England Journal of Medicine, 379(11), 1067-1074.
  • Kaiser Family Foundation. (2023). Federal and State Funding for Health Programs. https://www.kff.org
  • Levine, R., & Toffolon-Weiss, M. (2017). Public health policy: Approaches and issues. Oxford University Press.
  • Mechanic, D. (2019). Policy challenges in the organization of health services. Milbank Quarterly, 97(3), 757-778.
  • Obama, B. (2016). The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: A summary. Health Affairs Blog.
  • Rosenbaum, S. (2020). Medicaid policy in the era of COVID-19. JAMA, 324(14), 1375-1376.
  • World Health Organization. (2021). Health system financing. https://www.who.int

Related Assignments