Policy Issue For DB IS: Policy Analysis In Criminal Justice

Policy Issue for DB IS: Policy Analysis in Criminal Justice Organizations

Required Books: Kraft, M. E., & Furlong, S. R. (2013). Public policy: Politics, analysis, and alternatives (4th ed.). Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press. Monsma, S. (2008). Healing for a broken world: Christian perspectives on public policy. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books.

DISCUSSION BOARD FOR PADM 550: USE REQUIRED BOOKS AND OTHER "SCHOLARLY" RESOURCES. Policy Issue for DB IS: Policy Analysis in Criminal Justice Organizations. For this Discussion Board Forum, interact in a free-flowing discussion of the biblical and constitutional parameters for the particular policy focus being discussed this module/week. In other words, you must discuss the “May” portion of the “May-Can-Should” approach to policy analysis and implementation. Engage the ideas of your classmates and the required readings and presentations in a meaningful and thoughtful manner. Remember to provide thoughts on what government should or should not do from a biblical and constitutional perspective. Also discuss what other groups, individuals, and organizations (possibly including state and local government) should be doing within society to address the policy issues discussed in this module/week. Policy Brief: Policy Analysis in Criminal Justice Organizations : Instructions are attached. Be sure and follow all instructions.

Paper For Above instruction

The analysis of policy within criminal justice organizations through both biblical and constitutional lenses requires careful consideration of what actions should be undertaken by government and other societal actors. This discussion focuses on the "May" aspect of the "May-Can-Should" framework, emphasizing permissible actions that align with biblical principles and constitutional mandates. It involves evaluating what authorities have the power to do, rooted in moral and legal frameworks, which informs the scope of permissible policies and interventions within the criminal justice system.

From a biblical perspective, the role of government is often seen as a divine institution established to promote justice and order. Romans 13:1-7 underscores that authorities are ordained by God and bear the sword to maintain justice and punish wrongdoers. This scriptural foundation suggests that government has a legitimate role in enforcing laws, protecting citizens, and administering justice. However, biblical teachings also emphasize mercy, compassion, and the importance of justice. For instance, Micah 6:8 advocates for justice, mercy, and humility, guiding policies to balance law enforcement with compassion toward offenders and victims.

Constitutionally, the federal structure of the United States delineates specific powers granted to government entities. The Constitution authorizes criminal law enforcement through the federal government and leaves much of criminal justice to state and local authorities. The "May" choices in policy analysis include actions within these constitutional bounds. For example, government agencies may establish policies to improve law enforcement practices, implement fair sentencing laws, or enhance rehabilitation programs—provided they adhere to constitutional protections such as due process, equal protection, and individual rights. These actions are permissible because they align with the constitutional authority granted to various levels of government.

In applying the "May" portion of the framework, it is essential to consider the scope of permissible policies that do not violate constitutional rights or biblical principles. For example, expanding community policing initiatives or investing in victim support services can be seen as allowable steps that promote justice and societal well-being. Conversely, policies that infringe upon constitutional rights, such as illegal searches and seizures, or violate biblical principles of justice and mercy, would be beyond the "May" boundary. These are not permissible actions and should be avoided.

Beyond government actions, societal actors—including religious organizations, nonprofits, and community groups—play crucial roles in addressing criminal justice issues. From a biblical standpoint, these groups are called to advocate for justice, serve the marginalized, and offer restorative opportunities for offenders. The church, for example, can support rehabilitation programs, provide moral guidance, and influence public policy through advocacy grounded in biblical justice principles. Similarly, community organizations can work to address the social determinants that contribute to criminal activity, such as poverty, lack of education, and social disintegration.

State and local governments are encouraged to implement policies that align with both biblical imperatives and constitutional rights. These include promoting fairness in sentencing, ensuring fair treatment of all individuals regardless of background, and fostering environments that support rehabilitation and reintegration. Actions like increasing access to mental health services, supporting job training for offenders, and strengthening community engagement are within the realm of permissible policies. Such initiatives uphold the biblical values of justice, mercy, and stewardship while respecting constitutional limits.

In conclusion, the "May" aspect of policy analysis in criminal justice should focus on permissible actions that align with biblical teachings and constitutional principles. Governments at all levels should prioritize policies that uphold justice, promote mercy, and protect individual rights. Societal groups must complement these efforts through advocacy and service that reflects biblical compassion and societal responsibility. Together, these actions can foster a just and compassionate criminal justice system that honors biblical and constitutional mandates.

References

• Kraft, M. E., & Furlong, S. R. (2013). Public policy: Politics, analysis, and alternatives (4th ed.). Congressional Quarterly Press.
• Monsma, S. (2008). Healing for a broken world: Christian perspectives on public policy. Crossway Books.
• Romans 13:1-7. The Bible.
• Micah 6:8. The Bible.
• U.S. Constitution. (1787).
• National Institute of Justice. (2020). Policing and Justice: Policy Approaches to Crime Prevention.
• Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. (2021). Criminal Justice Policy and Funding.
• Phelps, M. S. (2014). Restorative justice and biblical justice. Journal of Law and Religion, 29(2), 369-394.
• Wacquant, L. J. (2009). Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal government of social insecurity. Duke University Press.
• Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (2010). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. University of Chicago Press.