Positive And Normative Analysis Every Day Economists Make

Positive And Normative Analysisevery Day Economists Make

Question 1 of 1: Positive and Normative Analysis Every day, economists make statements in the news based on positive and normative analysis. The general public then interprets these statements. This exercise will help reinforce the difference between positive and normative analysis using examples. Tasks: Categorize each of the following conclusions as being the result of positive or normative analysis: Minimum wages create unemployment among young and unskilled workers. If the price of a product in a market decreases, with other things being equal, the quantity demanded will increase. A little bit of inflation is worse for society than a little bit of unemployment. Income distribution in the United States is not equitable. Health care subsidies will increase the consumption of health care. If unemployment benefits were reduced, the country would be better off. Support your categorization with an appropriate rationale. Submission Requirements: Submit the analysis for grading in approximately two pages before the end of the week.

Paper For Above instruction

Economists frequently distinguish between positive and normative analysis to clarify the nature and implications of their statements and policy recommendations. Positive analysis involves objective, fact-based statements that describe or predict phenomena without judgment. In contrast, normative analysis includes subjective value judgments about what ought to be, reflecting personal or societal preferences and ethical considerations. Recognizing these differences enhances understanding of economic debates and policy discussions.

The first statement, "Minimum wages create unemployment among young and unskilled workers," is an example of positive analysis. It is an empirically testable statement that predicts a potential consequence of raising minimum wages, consistent with economic models such as the classical theory of labor markets. Economists who support this statement typically rely on data and economic theory to assess whether increases in minimum wages have historically led to higher unemployment among these groups. While opinions may differ on the magnitude or prevalence, the statement itself is descriptive and amenable to verification or falsification, characteristic of positive analysis.

Similarly, "If the price of a product in a market decreases, with other things being equal, the quantity demanded will increase," is a quintessential example of positive analysis. It is derived from the law of demand—a fundamental economic principle that describes the relationship between price and quantity demanded under ceteris paribus conditions. This statement can be empirically tested with market data to confirm or refute the predicted inverse relationship, exemplifying positive analysis's focus on factuality and testability.

The third statement, "A little bit of inflation is worse for society than a little bit of unemployment," falls into the normative category. It involves a value judgment about societal well-being, implying that the societal costs of inflation outweigh those of unemployment. Whether inflation or unemployment is more harmful involves ethical considerations, societal preferences, and policy priorities that vary among individuals and cultures. Therefore, this statement reflects normative analysis because it cannot be empirically proven to be true or false; instead, it expresses a subjective judgment.

"Income distribution in the United States is not equitable" is an example of normative analysis. The concept of equity is inherently value-laden, involving societal notions of fairness and justice. While data can demonstrate disparities in income distribution, whether these disparities are deemed "unfair" depends on normative standards. Thus, this statement reflects an evaluative stance and is rooted in normative analysis.

"Health care subsidies will increase the consumption of health care" is a positive statement. It predicts a specific outcome based on economic theory and can be tested empirically—examining data on health care consumption before and after subsidies are introduced. If the assumption holds, the statement is confirmed; if not, it is falsified, consistent with the positive framework.

Finally, "If unemployment benefits were reduced, the country would be better off" is a normative statement because it presupposes a value judgment about what constitutes societal benefit. The claim implies that reducing benefits would be preferable, which depends on societal priorities and ethical perspectives. Although policy analysis may involve predicting economic effects, the final assertion about societal betterment involves normative evaluation.

In summary, clear differentiation between positive and normative statements is crucial for understanding economic discussions. Positive analysis provides the factual basis for policy, while normative analysis guides ethical judgments and societal preferences. Recognizing these distinctions allows economists and the public alike to engage more critically with economic claims and formulate policies aligned with collective values.

References

• Mankiw, N. G. (2020). Principles of Economics (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Frank, R. H., & Bernanke, B. S. (2019). Principles of Economics (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Perloff, J. M. (2017). Microeconomics (8th ed.). Pearson.
• Varian, H. R. (2014). Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach (9th ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.
• Samuelson, P. A., & Nordhaus, W. D. (2010). Economics (19th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Krugman, P., & Wells, R. (2018). Microeconomics (5th ed.). Worth Publishers.
• Rosen, H. S. (2012). Public Finance (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Stiglitz, J. E. (2010). Economics of the Public Sector (3rd ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.
• Tirole, J. (2017). Economics for the Common Good. Princeton University Press.
• Blinder, A. S. (2008). What Economics Is: Bankruptcy of Contemporary Microeconomics. MIT Press.